*Pages 1--2 from Microsoft Word - 16858* Federal Communications Commission DA 00- 16 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Request for Review of the ) Decision of the ) Universal Service Administrator by ) ) Madison School District No. 321 ) File No. SLD- 133213 Rexburg, Idaho ) ) Federal- State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96- 45 Universal Service ) ) Changes to the Board of Directors of the ) CC Docket No. 97- 21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: January 6, 2000 Released: January 7, 2000 By the Common Carrier Bureau: 1. The Common Carrier Bureau has under consideration a request for review filed by the Madison School District No. 321 (Madison) of Rexburg, Idaho on October 1, 1999, seeking review of a decision issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator). For the reasons set forth below, we deny Madison’s request for review. 2. By letter dated August 3, 1999, the SLD denied Madison's requests for discounts pursuant to section 254 of the Communications Act. Madison states that it filed an appeal of that decision with the Administrator on September 10, 1999. In response, the Administrator issued a Decision on Appeal, 1 stating that it would not be able to consider Madison’s Letter of Appeal because it was not received by SLD within 30 days of the date of the SLD decision letter as required by the Commission's rules. 2 Subsequently, Madison filed the instant request for review of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. 1 Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Services Administrative Company, to Brent W. Orr, Madison School District No. 321, dated September 15, 1999 (Administrator’s Decision on Appeal). 2 47 C. F. R. § 54.720. 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 00- 16 2 3. Section 54.720 of the Commission's rules requires schools to seek review of an SLD initial decision within 30 days of the issuance of that decision. 3 In order to timely appeal the August 3, 1999 decision letter, Madison was required to have filed its appeal by September 2, 1999. 4 Because Madison filed its Letter of Appeal with the Administrator outside of the specified 30- day period, we deny its request for review here. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722( a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C. F. R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722( a), that the request for review filed October 1, 1999, by Madison School District No. 321, Rexburg, Idaho, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 3 See 47 C. F. R. § 54.720( b) ("[ a] n affected party requesting review of a division decision by a Committee of the Board pursuant to § 54.719( a), shall file such request within thirty (30) days of issuance of the decision by the division."). 4 In its Letter of Appeal, Madison states that the SLD decision letter was postmarked August 9, 1999 but does not provide a copy of the postmarked letter. However, even in the event that the SLD decision letter was issued on August 9, 1999, Madison did not file its appeal within the required 30- day period. 2