*Pages 1--3 from  Microsoft Word - 11302.doc*
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  01-  2062 
 Before  the  Federal  Communications  Commission 
 Washington,  DC  20554 


 In  the  Matter  of  ) 
 ) 
 Requests  for  Review  of  the  ) 
 Decision  of  the  ) 
 Universal  Service  Administrator  by  ) 
 ) 
 Alameda  County  Office  of  Education  )  File  No.  SLD-  277790,  277568, 
 Hayward,  California  )  266319 
 ) 
 Intelnet  Commission  )  File  No.  SLD-  201666 
 Indianapolis,  Indiana  ) 
 ) 
 Marysville  Public  Schools  )  File  No.  SLD-  201537 
 Marysville,  Michigan  ) 
 ) 
 Molalla  River  School  District  ) 
 Molalla,  Oregon  ) 
 ) 
 Sandhills  Technology/  Telecommunications  )  File  No.  SLD-  131643 
 Educational  Project  ) 
 Merna,  Nebraska  ) 
 ) 
 Southwest  Virginia  Education  and  Training  )  File  No.  SLD-  200540 
 Network  ) 
 Abingdon,  Virginia  ) 
 ) 
 Tariff  Affiliates,  Inc.  )  File  No.  SLD-  166675 
 Fairport,  New  York  ) 
 ) 
 Federal-  State  Joint  Board  on  )  CC  Docket  No.  96-  45 
 Universal  Service  ) 
 ) 
 Changes  to  the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  )  CC  Docket  No.  97-  21 
 National  Exchange  Carrier  Association,  Inc.  ) 


 ORDER 
 Adopted:  August  31,  2001  Released:  September  4,  2001 
 By  the  Accounting  Policy  Division,  Common  Carrier  Bureau: 
1
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  01-  2062 
 2 
 1.  The  Accounting  Policy  Division  (Division)  has  under  consideration  the  above-captioned 
 Requests  for  Review  of  decisions  issued  by  the  Schools  and  Libraries  Division  (SLD) 
 of  the  Universal  Service  Administrative  Company.  1  These  requests  seek  review  of  SLD 
 decisions  pursuant  to  section  54.719(  c)  of  the  Commission’s  rules.  2 


 2.  The  Commission’s  rules  provide  that  the  Common  Carrier  Bureau  (Bureau)  must 
 issue  a  decision  resolving  a  request  for  review  of  matters  properly  before  it  within  ninety  days 
 unless  the  time  period  is  extended.  3  The  Bureau  requires  additional  time  to  review  the  issues 
 presented.  Accordingly,  we  extend  by  an  additional  sixty  (60)  days  the  deadline  by  which  the 
 Bureau  must  take  action  regarding  the  instant  Requests  for  Review  of  decisions  by  the  Schools 
 and  Libraries  Division. 


 3.  Accordingly,  IT  IS  ORDERED,  pursuant  to  section  54.724(  a)  of  the  Commission's 
 rules,  47  C.  F.  R.  §  54.  724(  a),  that  the  time  period  for  taking  action  in  the  above-  captioned 
 Requests  for  Review  IS  EXTENDED  BY  an  additional  sixty  days  to  November  19,  2001,  for  the 
 Request  for  Review  filed  by  Alameda  County  Office  of  Education,  Hayward,  California;  to 
 November  13,  2001,  for  the  Request  for  Review  filed  by  Intelnet  Commission,  Indianapolis, 
 Indiana;  to  November  28,  2001,  for  the  Request  for  Review  filed  by  Marysville  Public  Schools, 
 Marysville,  Michigan;  to  November  27,  2001,  for  the  Request  for  Review  filed  by  Molalla  River 
 School  District,  Molalla,  Oregon;  to  November  27,  2001,  for  the  Request  for  Review  filed  by 
 Sandhills  Technology/  Telecommunications  Educational  Project,  Merna,  Nebraska;  to  November 
 5,  2001,  for  the  Request  for  Review  filed  by  Southwest  Virginia  Education  and  Training 


 1  Letter  from  Alan  Arjo,  Alameda  County  Office  of  Education,  to  Federal  Communications  Commission,  filed  June 
 21,  2001;  Letter  from  Bob  G.  Carnal,  Ed.  D,  Intelnet  Commission,  to  Federal  Communications  Commission,  filed 
 June  18,  2001;  Letter  from  Patricia  L.  Speilburg,  Marysville  Public  Schools  to  Federal  Communications 
 Commission,  filed  June  29,  2001;  Letter  from  Michael  Nickless,  Molalla  River  School  District,  to  Federal 
 Communications  Commission,  filed  July  2,  2001;  Letter  from  Marci  E.  Greenstein,  Sandhills 
 Technology/  Telecommunications  Educational  Project,  to  Federal  Communications  Commission,  filed  July  2,  2001; 
 Letter  from  Bruce  Matthews,  Southwest  Virginia  Education  and  Training  Network,  to  Federal  Communications 
 Commission,  filed  June  8,  2001;  Letter  from  Kim  Fish,  Tariff  Affiliates,  Inc.,  to  Federal  Communications 
 Commission,  filed  June  11,  2001. 


 2  Section  54.  719(  c)  of  the  Commission’s  rules  provides  that  any  person  aggrieved  by  an  action  taken  by  a  division  of 
 the  Administrator  may  seek  review  from  the  Commission.  47  C.  F.  R.  §  54.  719(  c). 
 3  47  C.  F.  R.  §  54.724(  a). 
2
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  01-  2062 
 3 
 Network,  Abingdon,  Virginia;  to  November  6,  2001,  for  the  Request  for  Review  filed  by  Tariff 
 Affiliates,  Inc.,  Fairport,  New  York. 


 FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 


 Mark  G.  Seifert 
 Deputy  Chief,  Accounting  Policy  Division 
 Common  Carrier  Bureau 
3