*Pages 1--2 from Microsoft Word - 19341.doc* Federal Communications Commission DA 02- 1535 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Request for Review of the ) Decision of the ) Universal Service Administrator by ) ) Lake Erie Educational Computer Association ) File No. SLD- 226303 Elyria, Ohio ) Form 486 Application No. 163618 ) Federal- State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96- 45 Universal Service ) ) Changes to the Board of Directors of the ) CC Docket No. 97- 21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) ORDER Adopted: June 28, 2002 Released: July 1, 2002 By the Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau: 1. The Telecommunications Access Policy Division has under consideration a Request for Review filed by Lake Erie Educational Computer Association (Lake Erie), Elyria, Ohio. 1 On or about the time that Lake Erie filed its request with the Commission, it filed a request for review with the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator). 2 For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss Lake Erie’s Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. 2. The Commission's rules regarding appeals of SLD decisions do not contemplate simultaneous requests to the Commission and the Administrator. 3 In this case, because Lake Erie has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Lake Erie’s Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Lake 1 Letter from Lloyd Wright, Lake Erie Educational Computer Association, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 23, 2002 (Request for Review). 2 Letter from Lloyd Wright, Lake Erie Educational Computer Association, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, filed May 29, 2002 (Request for Administrator Review). 3 47 C. F. R. § 54.720 (allowing appeals to either the Commission or the Administrator, but tolling the filing period with the Commission, when an applicant has an appeal pending with the Administrator, until the Administrator issues a decision on the appeal). 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 02- 1535 2 Erie’s initial request, Lake Erie may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. 4 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722( a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C. F. R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722( a), that the Request for Review filed on May 23, 2002, by Lake Erie Educational Computer Association, Elyria, Ohio, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 4 See 47 C. F. R. §§ 54. 719 – 54.725 (setting forth rights of review, filing deadlines, standards of review, and other rules pertaining to Commission review of the Administrator’s decisions). 2