*Pages 1--2 from Microsoft Word - 23125.doc* Federal Communications Commission DA 02- 3209 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 In re Application of McElroy Electronics Corporation For Authorization to Construct And Operate a Cellular Station in Market No. 555, New Mexico RSA 3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. 0000913369 ORDER Adopted: November 19, 2002 Released: November 20, 2002 By the Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: 1. On June 10, 2002, McElroy Electronics Corporation (McElroy) filed the above- captioned application seeking authorization to provide cellular service in the New Mexico - 3 Rural Service Area. The application appeared on public notice as accepted for filing on June 12, 2002. 1 On July 11, 2002, Smith Bagley, Inc. (SBI) filed a petition to deny the application (Petition). 2 2. In its Petition, SBI contends that the application is defective because the proposed system will cause harmful interference to SBI’s existing system. 3 On July 11, 2002, McElroy amended its application to remove any potential interference to SBI’s system. We therefore dismiss the SBI Petition as moot. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4( i), 303( r), and 309( d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C. §§ 154( i), 303( r), 309( d), and sections 0.331 and 1.939 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. §§ 0.331, 1.939, the petition to deny filed by Smith Bagley, Inc. on July 11, 2002, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Paul D’Ari Chief, Policy & Rules Branch Commercial Wireless Division 1 Public Notice, Report No. 1201 (June 12, 2002). 2 Petition to Deny filed by Smith Bagley, Inc. (July 11, 2002). 3 Specifically, SBI states that part of the geographic area for which McElroy proposes to provide service is already licensed to SBI on an exclusive basis; operation at the proposed sites will cause harmful interference to SBI without the consent of SBI; and McElroy proposes to provide service to an area that is not an unserved area. Petition at 2- 3 (citing 47 C. F. R. §§ 1. 934( e)( 2), 22. 911, and 22. 949, respectively). 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 02- xx 2 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 2