*Pages 1--5 from Microsoft Word - 28628* Federal Communications Commission DA 03- 1969 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 In the Matter of AT& T Corporation Complaints Regarding Unauthorized Change of Subscriber’s Telecommunications Carrier ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IC Nos. 01- S58689 01- S59608 01- S60578 01- S62282 01- S62950 01- S62957 02- S67638 02- S68049 02- S67667 02- S70461 02- S70635 02- S72034 02- S73454 02- S73586 02- S77064 02- S79527 02- S79787 02- S80699 02- S80811 02- S81233 02- S81495 02- S82045 ORDER Adopted: June 13, 2003 Released: June 18, 2003 By the Acting Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: 1. In this Order, we consider the complaints filed by Complainants 1 alleging that AT& T Corporation (AT& T) changed Complainants’ telecommunications service providers without obtaining authorization and verification from Complainants’ in violation of the Commission’s rules. 2 We conclude that AT& T’s actions did not result in an unauthorized change in Complainants’ telecommunications service providers and we deny Complainants’ complaints. 1 See Appendix A. 2 See 47 C. F. R. §§ 64.1100 – 64.1190. 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 03- 1969 2 2. In December 1998, the Commission released the Section 258 Order in which it adopted rules to implement Section 258 of the Communications Act of 1934 (Act), as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act). 3 Section 258 prohibits the practice of “slamming,” the submission or execution of an unauthorized change in a subscriber’s selection of a provider of telephone exchange service or telephone toll service. 4 In the Section 258 Order, the Commission adopted aggressive new rules designed to take the profit out of slamming, broadened the scope of the slamming rules to encompass all carriers, and modified its existing requirements for the authorization and verification of preferred carrier changes. The rules require, among other things, that a carrier receive individual subscriber consent before a carrier change may occur. 5 Pursuant to Section 258, carriers are absolutely barred from changing a customer's preferred local or long distance carrier without first complying with one of the Commission's verification procedures. 6 Specifically, a carrier must: (1) obtain the subscriber's written or electronically signed authorization in a format that meets the requirements of Section 64.1130 authorization; (2) obtains confirmation from the subscriber via a toll- free number provided exclusively for the purpose of confirming orders electronically; or (3) utilize an independent third party to verify the subscriber's order. 7 3. The Commission also has adopted liability rules. These rules require the carrier to absolve the subscriber where the subscriber has not paid his or her bill. In that context, if the subscriber has not already paid charges to the unauthorized carrier, the subscriber is absolved of liability for charges imposed by the unauthorized carrier for service provided during the first 30 3 47 U. S. C. § 258( a); Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996); Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier Selection Changes Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Policies and Rules Concerning Unauthorized Changes of Consumers’ Long Distance Carriers, CC Docket No. 94- 129, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 14 FCC Rcd 1508 (1998) (Section 258 Order), stayed in part, MCI Company v. FCC, No. 99- 1125 (D. C. Cir. May 18, 1999); First Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 8158 (2000); stay lifted, MCI Company v. FCC, No. 99- 1125 (D. C. Cir. June 27, 2000); Third Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 15996 (2000), Errata, DA No. 00- 2163 (rel. Sept. 25, 2000), Erratum, DA No. 00- 2192 (rel. Oct. 4, 2000), Order, FCC 01- 67 (rel. Feb. 22, 2001); reconsideration pending. Prior to the adoption of Section 258, the Commission had taken various steps to address the slamming problem. See, e. g., Policies and Rules Concerning Unauthorized Changes of Consumers' Long Distance Carriers, CC Docket No. 94- 129, Report and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 9560 (1995), stayed in part, 11 FCC Rcd 856 (1995); Policies and Rules Concerning Changing Long Distance Carriers, CC Docket No. 91- 64, 7 FCC Rcd 1038 (1992), reconsideration denied, 8 FCC Rcd 3215 (1993); Investigation of Access and Divestiture Related Tariffs, CC Docket No. 83- 1145, Phase I, 101 F. C. C. 2d 911, 101 F. C. C. 2d 935, reconsideration denied, 102 F. C. C. 2d 503 (1985). 4 47 U. S. C. § 258( a). 5 See 47 C. F. R. § 64.1120. 6 47 U. S. C. § 258( a). 7 See 47 C. F. R. § 64.1120( c). Section 64.1130 details the requirements for letter of agency form and content for written or electronically signed authorizations. 47 C. F. R. § 64.1130. 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 03- 1969 3 days after the unauthorized change. 8 Where the subscriber has paid charges to the unauthorized carrier, the Commission’s rules require that the unauthorized carrier pay 150% of those charges to the authorized carrier, and the authorized carrier shall refund or credit to the subscriber 50% of all charges paid by the subscriber to the unauthorized carrier. 9 Carriers should note that our actions in this Order do not preclude the Commission from taking additional action, if warranted, pursuant to Section 503 of the Act. 10 4. We received Complainants’ complaints alleging that Complainants’ telecommunications service providers had been changed without Complainants’ authorization. 11 Pursuant to Sections 1.719 and 64.1150 of our rules, 12 we notified AT& T of the complaints and AT& T responded. 13 Based on AT& T’s response, as well as information obtained from Complainant’s local exchange carrier, we find that AT& T did not violate our carrier change rules. Therefore, we find that AT& T’s actions did not result in an unauthorized change in Complainants’ telecommunications service. 14 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C. § 258, and Sections 0.141, 0.361 and 1.719 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. §§ 0.141, 0.361, 1.719, the complaints filed by Complainants against AT& T Corporation ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Nancy A. Stevenson, Acting Deputy Chief Policy Division 8 See 47 C. F. R. §§ 64.1140, 64.1160. Any charges imposed by the unauthorized carrier on the subscriber for service provided after this 30- day period shall be paid by the subscriber to the authorized carrier at the rates the subscriber was paying to the authorized carrier at the time of the unauthorized change. Id. 9 See 47 C. F. R. §§ 64.1140, 64.1170. 10 See 47 U. S. C. § 503. 11 See Appendix A. 12 47 C. F. R. § 1.719 (Commission procedure for informal complaints filed pursuant to Section 258 of the Act); 47 C. F. R. § 64.1150 (procedures for resolution of unauthorized changes in preferred carrier). 13 See Appendix A. 14 If Complainant is unsatisfied with the resolution of this complaint, Complainant may file a formal complaint with the Commission pursuant to Section 1.721 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. § 1.721. Such filing will be deemed to relate back to the filing date of Complainant’s informal complaint so long as the formal complaint is filed within 45 days from the date this order is mailed or delivered electronically to Complainant. See 47 C. F. R. § 1.719. 3 Federal Communications Commission DA 03- 1969 4 Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau APPENDIX A INFORMAL DATE OF DATE OF COMPLAINT COMPLAINTS RESPONSES NUMBERS 01- S58689 July 9, 2001 August 23, 2001 01- S59608 June 18, 2001 September 11, 2001 01- S60578 July 30, 2001 September 24, 2001 01- S62282 August 9, 2001 September 21, 2001 01- S62950 August 20, 2001 November 7, 2001 01- S62957 July 3, 2001 December 19, 2001 02- S67638 January 8, 2002 March 20, 2002 02- S68049 February 26, 2002 April 18, 2002 02- S67667 January 10, 2002 March 29, 2002 02- S70461 March 7, 2002 May 3, 2002 02- S70635 March 28, 2002 May 23, 2002 02- S72034 April 16, 2002 May 28, 2002 02- S73454 March 8, 2002 July 9, 2002 02- S73586 April 30, 2002 July 27, 2002 02- S77064 June 11, 2002 August 19, 2002 02- S79527 June 12, 2002 September 23, 2002 02- S79787 July 22, 2002 September 30, 2002 02- S80699 October 2, 2002 November 21, 2002 02- S80811 October 10, 2002 November 21, 2002 02- S81233 October 31, 2002 December 12, 2002 02- S81495 November 14, 2002 December 30, 2002 4 Federal Communications Commission DA 03- 1969 5 02- S82045 December 26, 2002 February 25, 2003 5