*Pages 1--3 from Microsoft Word - 34192* Federal Communications Commission DA 03- 3935 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Requests for Review of the ) Decision of the ) Universal Service Administrator by ) ) Clark Township School District ) File No. SLD- 329953 Syracuse, New York ) ) Coahoma Agricultural High School ) File No. SLD- 314299 Clarksdale, Mississippi ) ) Exp@ nets ) File No. SLD- 233827 Albuquerque, New Mexico ) ) Fabens Independent School District ) File No. SLD- 313042 Fabens, Texas ) ) Inter- Tel Technologies, Inc. ) File No. SLD- 256403 Tempe, Arizona ) ) Maricopa County Sp Ed Acc District 512 ) File No. SLD- 375429 Phoenix, Arizona ) ) Nicholas County School District ) File No. SLD- 341461 Summerville, West Virginia ) ) Nottoway County Library ) File No. SLD- 352966 Crewe, Virginia ) ) Onondaga- Courtland- Madison BOCES ) File Nos. SLD- 204940, 204967, Syracuse, New York ) 209423 ) Onondaga- Cortland- Madison BOCES ) File No. SLD- 296555 Syracuse, New York ) ) Saint Catherine of Genoa School ) File No. SLD- 308275 New York, New York ) ) Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support ) CC Docket No. 02- 6 Mechanism ) ) 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 03- 3935 2 ORDER Adopted: December 11, 2003 Released: December 12, 2003 By the Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau: 1. The Telecommunications Access Policy Division (Division) has under consideration the above- captioned Requests for Review of decisions issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company. 1 These requests seek review of SLD decisions pursuant to section 54.719( c) of the Commission’s rules. 2 2. The Commission’s rules provide that the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) must issue a decision resolving a request for review of matters properly before it within ninety (90) days unless the time period is extended. 3 The Bureau requires additional time to review the issues presented. Accordingly, we extend by an additional sixty (60) days the deadline by which the Bureau must take action regarding the instant Requests for Review of decisions by the SLD. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 54.724( a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C. F. R. § 54.724( a), that the time period for taking action in the above- captioned Requests for Review IS EXTENDED BY an additional sixty (60) days to February 3, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Clark Township School District, Syracuse, New York; to February 10, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Coahoma Agricultural High School, Clarksdale, Mississippi; to February 21, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Exp@ nets, Albuquerque, New Mexico; to February 10, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Fabens Independent School District, Fabens, Texas; to February 7, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Inter- Tel Technologies, Inc., Tempe, Arizona; to February 24, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Maricopa County Sp Ed Acc District 512, Phoenix, Arizona; to February 24, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Nicholas County School District, Summerville, West Virginia; to February 3, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Nottoway County Library, Crewe, Virginia; to February 10, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Onondaga- Cortland-Madison BOCES, Syracuse, New York; to February 3, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by 1 Letter from Michelle L. Chemotti, Clark Township School District, filed September 5, 2003; Letter from Carol Borgognoni, Coahoma Agricultural High School, filed September 11, 2003; Letter from Corbin Witt, Exp@ nets, filed September 26, 2003; Letter from Mario Dominguez, Fabens Independent School District, filed September 12, 2003; Letter from Stephen H. Wong., Inter- Tel Technologies, Inc., filed September 10, 2003; Letter from Dr. Allison Cioffi, Maricopa County Special Education Acc District No. 512, filed September 29, 2003; Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, Nicholas County School District, filed September 29, 2003; Letter from Nancy S. Pierce, Nottoway County Library, filed September 8, 2003; Letter from Anthony R. Hanley, Onondaga- Cortland- Madison BOCES, filed September 15, 2003; Letter from Michael J. Fay, Onondaga- Cortland- Madison BOCES, filed September 5, 2003; Letter from Nancy Collins, Saint Catherine of Genoa School, filed September 17, 2003 (Requests for Review). 2 See Requests for Review. Section 54. 719( c) of the Commission’s rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C. F. R. § 54. 719( c). 3 47 C. F. R. § 54. 724( a). 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 03- 3935 3 Onondaga- Cortland- Madison BOCES No. 442, Syracuse, New York; to February 14, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Saint Catherine of Genoa School, New York, New York. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 3