*Pages 1--4 from Microsoft Word - 35099* PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S. W. Washington, D. C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418- 0500 Fax- On- Demand 202 / 418- 2830 TTY 202 / 418- 2555 Internet: http:// www. fcc. gov ftp fcc gov DA 04- 149 January 26, 2004 ENFORCEMENT BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC. SECTION 272 BIENNIAL AUDIT REPORT IN EB DOCKET NO. 03- 199 Comments Due: March 26, 2004 Pursuant to section 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (“ Communications Act”), 1 the Commission has authorized SBC Communications Inc. (“ SBC”) to enter the in- region interLATA market in Arkansas, California, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, and Wisconsin. 2 Section 272 of the Communications Act requires Bell Operating Companies to offer in- region, interLATA service through separate affiliates that comply with certain structural, nondiscrimination, and accounting safeguards. Section 272( d) requires a biennial audit. 3 We have received the results of the biennial audit of SBC’s second and third year of operations in Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma, and SBC’s first and second year of operations in Arkansas, Missouri, California, and Nevada. The audit report, “SBC 1 47 U. S. C. § 271. 2 See Application by SBC Communications Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc, d/ b/ a Southwestern Bell Long Distance Pursuant to Section 271 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in Texas, CC Docket No. 00- 65, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 18354 (2000); Joint Application by SBC Communications Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc. d/ b/ a Southwestern Bell Long Distance for Provision of In- Region, InterLATA Services in Kansas and Oklahoma, CC Docket No. 00- 217, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 6237 (2001); Joint Application by SBC Communications Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc. d/ b/ a Southwestern Bell Long Distance Pursuant to Section 271 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in Arkansas and Missouri, CC Docket No. 01- 194, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 20719 (2001); Application by SBC Communications Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc., for Authorization to Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in California, WC Docket No. 02- 306, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 25650 (2002); Application by SBC Communications Inc., Nevada Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc., for Authorization to Provide In- Region InterLATA Services in Nevada, WC Docket No. 03- 10, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 7196 (2003); Application by SBC Communications Inc., Michigan Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc., for Authorization to Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, WC Docket No. 03- 138, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 19024 (2003); and Joint Application by SBC Communications Inc., Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Indiana Bell Telephone Company Incorporated, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Wisconsin Bell, Inc., and Southwestern Bell Communications Services, Inc., for Authorization to Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Wisconsin, WC Docket No. 03- 167, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 21543 (2003). 3 47 U. S. C. § 272( d). 1 2 Communications Inc. Report of Independent Accountants on Applying Agreed- Upon Procedures,” was submitted by Ernst & Young LLP on December 18, 2003. Section 272( d)( 2) of the Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available. 4 We now release the SBC audit report. In accordance with section 53.213( d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. 5 Accordingly, comments are due no later than March 26, 2004. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS We find that it would be in the public interest to treat this proceeding as an exempt proceeding under the ex parte rules. 6 Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte communications to or from Commission decision- making personnel are permissible and need not be disclosed, in accordance with section 1.1204( b) of the Commission's Rules. 7 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. 9 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to . Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e- mail. To get filing instructions for e- mail comments, commenters should send an e- mail to ecfs@ fcc. gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, "get form