*Pages 1--3 from Microsoft Word - 39929* Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 2029 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 In the matter of LB Cable LLC Operator of Cable Systems in Georgia and Montana Request for Waivers of Section 11.11( a) of the Commission’s Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No.: EB- 04- HS- 023 ORDER Adopted: July 6, 2004 Released: July 8, 2004 By the: Director, Office of Homeland Security, Enforcement Bureau 1. In this Order, we grant LB Cable LLC (LB Cable) temporary waivers of section 11. 11( a) of the Federal Communications Commission’s (Commission) rules (Rules) 1 for 20 cable television systems listed in Attachment A. Section 11.11( a) of the Rules requires cable systems serving fewer than 5,000 subscribers from a headend to either provide national level Emergency Alert System (EAS) messages on all programmed channels or install EAS equipment and provide a video interrupt and audio alert on all programmed channels and EAS audio and video messages on at least one programmed channel by October 1, 2002. 2 2. The Cable Act of 1992 added new section 624( g) to the Communications Act of 1934, as amended 3 and required that cable systems be capable of providing EAS alerts to their subscribers. 4 In 1994, the Commission adopted rules requiring cable systems to participate in EAS. 5 In 1997, the Commission amended the EAS rules to provide financial relief for small cable systems. 6 The Commission declined to exempt small cable systems from the EAS requirements entirely, concluding that 1 47 C. F. R. § 11.11( a). 2 Id. 3 The Communications Act of 1934 was amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Pub. L. No. 104- 104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996) (1996 Act). 4 Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102- 385, § 16( b), 106 Stat. 1460, 1490 (1992). Section 624( g) provides that “each cable operator shall comply with such standards as the Commission shall prescribe to ensure that viewers of video programming on cable systems are afforded the same emergency information as is afforded by the emergency broadcasting system pursuant to Commission regulations ….” 47 U. S. C. § 544( g). 5 Amendment of Part 73, Subpart G, of the Commission’s Rules Regarding the Emergency Broadcast System, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 10 FCC Rcd 1786 (1994), reconsideration granted in part, denied in part, 10 FCC Rcd 11494 (1995). 6 Amendment of Part 73, Subpart G, of the Commission’s Rules Regarding the Emergency Broadcast System, Second Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 15503 (1997). 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 2029 2 such an exemption would be inconsistent with the statutory mandate of section 624( g). 7 The amended rules extended the deadline for cable systems serving fewer than 10,000 subscribers to begin complying with the EAS rules to October 1, 2002, and provided cable systems serving fewer than 5,000 subscribers the option of either providing national level EAS messages on all programmed channels or installing EAS equipment and providing a video interrupt and audio alert on all programmed channels and EAS audio and video messages on at least one programmed channel. 8 In addition, the Commission stated that it would grant waivers of the EAS rules to small cable systems on a case- by- case basis upon a showing of financial hardship. 9 3. On March 2, 2004, LB Cable filed a request for temporary waivers of the EAS requirements for the recently acquired small cable systems in rural Georgia and Montana, asserting that the cost of immediate installation of EAS equipment in the 20 systems would cause financial hardship. LB Cable states that it began operating the subject systems on the day that it acquired them in a bankruptcy sale on February 2, 2004, and, therefore has not had enough time to generate sufficient revenue to purchase and install EAS equipment at this time. Based on price quotes from EAS equipment manufacturers, LB Cable estimates that it would cost approximately $200,000 to purchase and install the EAS equipment at the 20 headends. LB Cable asserts that without the requested waivers, it may have to delay or cancel its plans to upgrade and interconnect the 20 headends which would delay or eliminate the delivery of broadband services to over 8,900 rural subscribers. Finally, LB Cable contends that subscribers will continue to have ready access to national EAS information from other sources, including its cable system and over- the- air reception of broadcast television and radio stations. 4. Based on our review of the information submitted by LB Cable, we conclude that temporary waivers of section 11.11( a) of the Rules for the 20 cable systems listed in Attachment A, are warranted. In particular, we find that the estimated cost of $200,000 to purchase and install EAS equipment at these recently acquired cable television systems could impose a financial hardship on LB Cable. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.111, 0204( b) and 0.311 of the rules, 10 LB Cable LLC’s request for temporary waivers of section 11.11( a) of the rules is GRANTED until October 1, 2005, for its 20 cable television systems listed in Attachment A. 11 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that LB Cable LLC place a copy of this waiver in its system files. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to counsel for LB Cable LLC, Christopher C. Cinnamon, Esq., Cinnamon Muller, 307 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 1020, Chicago, Illinois 60601. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION James A. Dailey Director, Office of Homeland Security 7 Id. at 15512- 13. 8 Id. at 15516- 15518. 9 Id. at 15513. 10 47 C. F. R. §§ 0.111, 0. 204( b) and 0.311. 11 We clarify that these waivers also encompass the EAS testing and monitoring requirements. 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 2029 3 Enforcement Bureau ATTACHMENT A Cable System Temporary Waiver Granted Until Abbeville, Georgia October 1, 2005 Allentown, Georgia October 1, 2005 Dry Branch, Georgia October 1, 2005 Dudley, Georgia October 1, 2005 East Dublin, Georgia October 1, 2005 Gordon, Georgia October 1, 2005 Guyton, Georgia October 1, 2005 Newton County, Georgia October 1, 2005 North Baldwin, Georgia October 1, 2005 Port Wentworth, Georgia October 1, 2005 Rentz, Georgia October 1, 2005 Rochelle, Georgia October 1, 2005 Sparta, Georgia October 1, 2005 Wrens, Georgia October 1, 2005 Big Sky, Montana October 1, 2005 Culbertson, Montana October 1, 2005 Plentywood, Montana October 1, 2005 Poplar, Montana October 1, 2005 Scobey, Montana October 1, 2005 West Yellowston, Montana October 1, 2005 3