*Pages 1--4 from Microsoft Word - 42845* Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3160 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Requests for Review of the ) Decision of the ) Universal Service Administrator by ) ) Atek Construction, Inc. ) File No. SLD- 153005 Costa Mesa, California ) ) Bath County Board of Education ) File No. SLD- 392300 Owingsville, Kentucky ) ) Brown County Schools ) File No. SLD- 423655 Nashville, Indiana ) ) Colton School District No. 53 ) File No. SLD- 434227 Colton, Oregon ) ) DeSoto Parish School Board and Tensas Parish ) File Nos. SLD- 288236, 291803 School Board ) Baton Rouge, Louisiana ) ) Kearney Public Schools ) File No. SLD- 396314 Kearney, Nebraska ) ) Kent City Schools ) File No. SLD- 231188 Kent City, Ohio ) ) Kentucky Department of Education ) File Nos. SLD- 368830, 381199, Frankfort, Kentucky ) 347788,369316,375220,364434, ) 363267,372802,365214,367792, ) 363648,360082,381100,371434, ) 362629,363713,361782,374958, ) 371130 ) Lavalette Board of Education ) File No. SLD- 430991 Lavalette, New Jersey ) ) Maine School Administrative District No. 36 ) File No. SLD- 434452 Livermore Falls, Maine ) ) Maumee City School District ) File No. SLD- 433796 Maumee, Ohio ) ) Mililani Mauka Elementary ) File No. SLD- 435235 Honolulu, Hawaii ) ) 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3160 2 Moencopi Day School ) File No. SLD- 388623 Tuba City, Arizona ) ) Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/ b/ a SBC California ) File No. SLD- 179828 San Jose, California ) ) Perrysburg Schools ) File No. SLD- 433571 Perrysburg, Ohio ) ) Phenix City Public Schools ) File Nos. SLD- 322329, 323545 Phenix City, Alabama ) ) Rangeley Public Library ) File No. SLD- 412504 Rangeley, Maine ) ) South Baltimore Learning Center ) File No. SLD- 192919 Baltimore, Maryland ) ) Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ) File No. SLD- 202704 Corpus Cristi, Texas ) ) Washington Local Schools ) File No. SLD- 434128 Toledo, Ohio ) ) Wayne County Public Schools ) File Nos. SLD- 375448, 375599, Cleveland, Ohio ) 375634,375658 ) Yeshiva Masoras Avos ) File No. SLD- 347572 Lakewood, New Jersey ) ) Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support ) CC Docket No. 02- 6 Mechanism ) ORDER Adopted: October 5, 2004 Released: October 5, 2004 By the Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau: 1. The Telecommunications Access Policy Division (Division) has under consideration the above- captioned Requests for Review of decisions issued by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company. 1 These requests seek review of SLD decisions pursuant to section 54.719( c) of the Commission’s rules. 2 1 Letter from Ali Taha, Atek Construction, Inc., filed July 19, 2004; Letter from Ronnie Bailey, Bath County Board of Education, filed June 26, 2004; Letter from John Emkes, Brown County Schools, filed June 8, 2004; Letter from Jeff Flaig, Colton School District No. 53, filed June 6, 2004; Letter from Kenneth Sills, DeSoto Parish School Board and Tensas Parish School Board, filed July 27, 2004; Letter from Karl Yeutter and Dr. Ken Anderson, Kearney Public Schools, filed July19, 2004; Letter from Dr. Joseph Giancola, Kent City Schools, filed June 28, 2004; Letter from Amy Worlton, Kentucky Department of Education, filed July 20, 2004; Letter from Patricia Christopher, Lavalette Board of Education, filed July 27, 2004; Letter from Terry Despres, Maine School Administrative District 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3160 3 2. The Commission’s rules provide that the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) must issue a decision resolving a request for review of matters properly before it within ninety (90) days unless the time period is extended. 3 The Bureau requires additional time to review the issues presented. Accordingly, we extend by an additional sixty (60) days the deadline by which the Bureau must take action regarding the instant Requests for Review of decisions by the SLD. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 54.724( a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C. F. R. § 54. 724( a), that the time period for taking action in the above- captioned Requests for Review IS EXTENDED BY an additional sixty (60) days to December 14, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Atek Construction, Inc., Costa Mesa, California; to December 21, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Bath County Board of Education, Owingsville, Kentucky; to December 6, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Brown County Schools, Nashville, Indiana; to December 3, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Colton School District No. 53, Colton, Oregon; to December 27, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by DeSoto Parish School Board and Tensas Parish School Board, Baton Rouge, Louisiana; to December 14, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Kearney Public Schools, Kearney, Nebraska; to December 27, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Kent City Schools, Kent City, Ohio; to December 17, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Kentucky Department of Education, Frankfort, Kentucky; to December 27, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Lavalette Board of Education, Lavalette, New Jersey; to December 21, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Maine School Administrative District No. 36, Livermore Falls, Maine; to December 14, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Maumee City School District, Maumee, Ohio; to December 27, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Mililani Mauka Elementary, Honolulu, Hawaii; to December 28, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Moencopi Day School, Tuba City, Arizona; to December 10, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/ b/ a SBC California, San Jose, California; to December 17, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Perrysburg Schools, Perrysburg, Ohio; to December 14, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Phenix City Public Schools, Phenix City, Alabama; to December 27, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Rangeley Public Library, Rangeley, Maine; to December 14, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by South Baltimore Learning Center, Baltimore, Maryland; to December 10, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Corpus Cristi, Texas; to December 17, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Washington Local Schools, Toledo, Ohio; to December 3, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by No. 36, filed July 26, 2004; Letter from Paul Brotzki, Maumee City School District, filed July 19, 2004; Letter from Glenn Minami, Mililani Mauka Elementary, filed July 30, 2004; Letter from Wendell Coats, Moencopi Day School, filed August 2, 2004; Letter from Christopher Heimann, Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/ b/ a SBC California, filed July 14, 2004; Letter from Richard Jones, Perrysburg Schools, filed July 20, 2004; Letter from Larry Dichiara, Phenix City Public Schools, filed July 19, 2004; Letter from Sue Downes- Borko, Rangeley Public Library, filed July 29, 2004; Letter from Ann Rakestraw, South Baltimore Learning Center, filed July 19, 2004; Letter from Christopher Heimann, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, filed July 13, 2004; Letter from David Bringman, Washington Local Schools, filed July 21, 2004; Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, Wayne County Public Schools, filed July 6, 2004; Letter from Pesach Grossman, Yeshiva Masoras Avos, filed July 19, 2004 (Requests for Review). 2 See Requests for Review. Section 54. 719( c) of the Commission’s rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C. F. R. § 54. 719( c). 3 47 C. F. R. § 54. 724( a). 3 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3160 4 Wayne County Public Schools, Cleveland, Ohio; to December 14, 2004, for the Request for Review filed by Yeshiva Masoras Avos, Lakewood, New Jersey. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 4