*Pages 1--23 from Microsoft Word - 44011.doc* Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 In the Matter of Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service Sprint Corporation Application for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Alabama Application for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Florida Application for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Georgia Application for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of New York Application for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of North Carolina Application for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Tennessee Application for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Virginia ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96- 45 ORDER Adopted: November 18, 2004 Released: November 18, 2004 By the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order, we grant the petitions of Sprint Corporation (Sprint) to be designated as an eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) for the requested service areas in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia, pursuant to section 214( e)( 6) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act). 1 In so doing, we conclude that Sprint, a commercial 1 See Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Alabama, filed September 5, 2003 (Alabama Petition); Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Florida, filed October 10, 2003 (Florida Petition); Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Georgia, filed September 8, 2003 (Georgia Petition); Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of New York, filed September 2, 2003 (New York Petition); Application of (continued....) 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 2 mobile radio service (CMRS) carrier, has satisfied the statutory eligibility requirements of section 214( e)( 1) to be designated as an ETC. 2 II. BACKGROUND A. The Act 2. Section 254( e) of the Act provides that “only an eligible telecommunications carrier designated under section 214( e) shall be eligible to receive specific Federal universal service support.” 3 Pursuant to section 214( e)( 1), a common carrier designated as an ETC must offer and advertise the services supported by the federal universal service mechanisms throughout the designated service area. 4 3. Section 214( e)( 2) of the Act provides state commissions with the primary responsibility for performing ETC designations. 5 Section 214( e)( 6), however, directs the Commission, upon request, to designate as an ETC “a common carrier providing telephone exchange service and exchange access that is not subject to the jurisdiction of a State commission.” 6 Under section 214( e)( 6), the Commission may, with respect to an area served by a rural telephone company, and shall, in all other cases, designate more than one common carrier as an ETC for a designated service area, consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity, so long as the requesting carrier meets the requirements of section 214( e)( 1). 7 Before designating an additional ETC for an area served by a rural telephone company, the Commission must determine that the designation is in the public interest. 8 (... continued from previous page) Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of North Carolina, filed November 5, 2003 (North Carolina Petition); Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Tennessee, filed September 3, 2003 (Tennessee Petition); Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Virginia, filed August 29, 2003 (Virginia Petition); Sprint Reply Comments, filed November 20, 2003 (Sprint Reply); Sprint Reply Comments for the State of Florida, filed March 1, 2004 (Sprint Florida Reply); Sprint Reply Comments for the State of North Carolina, filed March 25, 2004 (Sprint North Carolina Reply); Sprint Corporation Supplementary Filing for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier, filed May 14, 2004 (Sprint Supplement); Sprint Corporation Reply to Comments on Supplemental Filing, filed June 9, 2004 (Sprint Supplemental Reply); Letter from Luisa L. Lancetti, Vice President, Wireless Regulatory Affairs, Sprint, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (September 29, 2004) (Sprint September 29, 2004 Letter); Letter from David L. Sieradzki, Counsel for Sprint Corporation, Hogan & Hartson, L. L. P., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (November 4, 2004) (Sprint November 4, 2004 Letter); see also 47 U. S. C. § 214( e)( 6). 2 47 U. S. C. § 214( e)( 1). 3 47 U. S. C. § 254( e). 4 47 U. S. C. § 214( e)( 1). 5 47 U. S. C. § 214( e)( 2). See also Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service; Promoting Deployment and Subscribership in Unserved Areas, Including Tribal and Insular Areas, Twelfth Report and Order, Memorandum Opinion and Order, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 15 FCC Rcd 12208, 12255, para. 93 (2000) (Twelfth Report and Order). 6 47 U. S. C. § 214( e)( 6). See, e. g., Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service, Virginia Cellular, LLC Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier for the Commonwealth of Virginia, Memorandum Opinion and Order, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 19 FCC Rcd 1563 (2004) (Virginia Cellular Order); Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service, Highland Cellular, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier for the Commonwealth of Virginia, Memorandum Opinion and Order, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 19 FCC Rcd 6422 (2004) (Highland Cellular Order). 7 47 U. S. C. § 214( e)( 6). 8 Id. 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 3 B. Commission Requirements for ETC Designation 4. An ETC petition must contain the following: (1) a certification and brief statement of supporting facts demonstrating that the petitioner is not subject to the jurisdiction of a state commission; (2) a certification that the petitioner offers or intends to offer all services designated for support by the Commission pursuant to section 254( c); (3) a certification that the petitioner offers or intends to offer the supported services “either using its own facilities or a combination of its own facilities and resale of another carrier’s services;” (4) a description of how the petitioner “advertise[ s] the availability of [supported] services and the charges therefor using media of general distribution;” and (5) if the petitioner meets the definition of a “rural telephone company” pursuant to section 3( 37) of the Act, an identification of the petitioner’s study area, or, if the petitioner is not a rural telephone company, a detailed description of the geographic service area for which it requests an ETC designation from the Commission. 9 5. On June 30, 2000, the Commission released the Twelfth Report and Order which, among other things, set forth how a carrier seeking ETC designation from the Commission must demonstrate that the state commission lacks jurisdiction to perform the ETC designation. 10 Carriers seeking designation as an ETC for service provided on non- tribal lands must provide the Commission with an “affirmative statement” from the state commission or a court of competent jurisdiction that the carrier is not subject to the state commission’s jurisdiction. 11 The requirement to provide an “affirmative statement” ensures that the state commission has had “a specific opportunity to address and resolve issues involving a state commission’s authority under state law to regulate certain carriers or classes of carriers.” 12 6. On January 22, 2004, the Commission released the Virginia Cellular Order, which granted in part and denied in part the petition of Virginia Cellular, LLC (Virginia Cellular) to be designated as an ETC throughout its licensed service area in the Commonwealth of Virginia. 13 In that Order, the Commission utilized a new public interest analysis for ETC designations and imposed ongoing conditions and reporting requirements on Virginia Cellular. 14 The Commission further stated that the framework enunciated in the Virginia Cellular Order would apply to all ETC designations for rural areas pending further action by the Commission. 15 Following the framework established in the Virginia Cellular Order, on April 12, 2004, the Commission released the Highland Cellular Order, which granted in part and denied in part the petition of Highland Cellular, Inc. to be designated as an ETC in portions of its licensed service area in the Commonwealth of Virginia. 16 In the Highland Cellular Order, the Commission concluded, among other things, that a telephone company in a rural study area may not be designated as a competitive ETC below the wire center level. 17 9 See Section 214( e)( 6) Public Notice, 12 FCC Rcd at 22948- 49 (1997); 47 U. S. C. § 3( 37). See also Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service, Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Preemption of an Order of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, Declaratory Ruling, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 15 FCC Rcd 15168 (2000), recon. pending. 10 See Twelfth Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 12255- 65, paras. 93- 114. 11 Id., 15 FCC Rcd at 12255, para. 93. 12 Id. 13 See Virginia Cellular Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 1564, para. 1. 14 See id., 19 FCC Rcd at 1565, 1575- 76, 1584- 85, paras. 4, 27, 28, 46. 15 See id., 19 FCC Rcd at 1565, para. 4. 16 See Highland Cellular Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 6422, para. 1. 17 See id., 19 FCC Rcd at 6438, para. 33. 3 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 4 C. Sprint Petitions 7. Pursuant to section 214( e)( 6), Sprint filed with this Commission seven petitions and supplements thereto, seeking designation as an ETC in study areas served by non- rural incumbent local exchange carriers (LECs) in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. 18 The Wireline Competition Bureau (WCB) released public notices seeking comment on these petitions. 19 In response, a number of parties filed comments and oppositions. 20 On April 12, 2004, the WCB released a public notice inviting parties with pending ETC petitions, including Sprint, to supplement their petitions in light of the new ETC designation framework established in the Virginia Cellular Order. 21 Sprint filed a supplement to its ETC petitions on May 14, 2004, four parties filed additional comments responsive to the Sprint petitions, and Sprint filed a supplemental reply on June 9, 2004. 22 III. DISCUSSION 8. After careful review of the record before us, we find that Sprint has met all the requirements set forth in section 214( e)( 1) and (e)( 6) to be designated as an ETC by this Commission for its licensed service areas described herein. Sprint’s ETC designation for these service areas is effective immediately. A. Commission Authority to Perform the ETC Designations 9. We find that Sprint has demonstrated that the Commission has authority to consider Sprint’s petitions under section 214( e)( 6) of the Act. 23 Sprint’s petitions each include an affirmative statement from the relevant state commission stating that requests for designation as eligible 18 See supra note 1. Sprint also filed an eighth application for ETC designation in certain study areas in Pennsylvania. See Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Pennsylvania, filed September 4, 2003. This application is not addressed herein and remains pending. See Sprint November 4, 2004 Letter at 2 (Sprint does not object to separate treatment of Pennsylvania petition). 19 See Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Sprint Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier In the State of Alabama, Public Notice, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 18 FCC Rcd 19493 (2003); Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Sprint Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier In the State of Florida, Public Notice, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 19 FCC Rcd 282 (2004); Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Sprint Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier and Rural Service Area Redefinition In the State of Georgia, Public Notice, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 18 FCC Rcd 19505 (2003); Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Sprint Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier and Rural Service Area Redefinition In the State of New York, Public Notice, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 18 FCC Rcd 19502 (2003); Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Sprint Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier and Rural Service Area Redefinition In the State of North Carolina, Public Notice, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 19 FCC Rcd 285 (2004); Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Sprint Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier In the State of Tennessee, Public Notice, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 18 FCC Rcd 19496 (2003); Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Sprint Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier In the State of Virginia, Public Notice, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 18 FCC Rcd 19508 (2003). 20 See Appendix A for a list of entities filing comments, reply comments, and oppositions associated with the seven petitions for ETC designation. 21 Parties are Invited to Update the Record Pertaining to Pending Petitions for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Designations, Public Notice, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 19 FCC Rcd 6409 (2004). 22 See Appendix A. 23 47 C. F. R. § 214( e)( 6). 4 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 5 telecommunications carriers should be sought from the Commission. 24 B. Offering and Advertising the Supported Services 10. Offering the Services Designated for Support. Sprint has demonstrated through the required certifications and related filings that it now offers, or will offer upon designation as an ETC, the services supported by the federal universal service mechanism. As noted in its petitions, Sprint is authorized to provide broadband personal communications service in the relevant portions of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. 25 Sprint certifies that it now provides or will provide throughout its designated service area the services and functionalities enumerated in section 54.101( a) of the Commission’s rules. 26 Sprint has also certified that, in compliance with rule section 54.405, it will make available and advertise Lifeline service to qualifying low- income consumers. 27 Furthermore, Sprint has made commitments that closely track those set forth in the Virginia Cellular Order and the Highland Cellular Order, including: (1) annual reporting of progress towards buildout plans, unfulfilled service requests, and complaints per 1,000 handsets; (2) specific commitments to provide service to requesting customers in the area for which it is designated, including those areas outside existing network coverage; and (3) specific commitments to construct new cell sites in areas outside its network coverage. 28 11. We reject the claims of certain commenters that Sprint does not provide the required services and functionalities supported by the universal service mechanism. First, commenters argue that 24 Alabama Petition at 3- 4 & Exhibit D; Florida Petition at 3- 4 & Exhibit D; Georgia Petition at 3- 4 & Exhibit D; New York Petition at 3- 4 & Exhibit D; North Carolina Petition at 3- 4 & Exhibit D; Tennessee Petition at 3- 4 & Exhibit D; Virginia Petition at 3- 4 & Exhibit D. See also CTIA Alabama Comments at 2- 3; CTIA Florida Comments at 2- 3; CTIA Georgia Comments at 2- 3; CTIA New York Comments at 2- 3; CTIA North Carolina Comments at 2- 3; CTIA Tennessee Comments at 2- 3; CTIA Virginia Comments at 2- 3. 25 Alabama Petition at 2 and Attachment A at 1; Florida Petition at 2 and Attachment A at 1; Georgia Petition at 2 and Attachment A at 1; New York Petition at 2 and Attachment A at 1; North Carolina Petition at 2 and Attachment A at 1; Tennessee Petition at 2 and Attachment A at 1; Virginia Petition at 2 and Attachment A at 1. 26 Alabama Petition at 5- 9 and Attachment A at 1- 2; Florida Petition at 5- 8 and Attachment A at 1- 2; Georgia Petition at 5- 8 and Attachment A at 1- 2; New York Petition at 5- 8 and Attachment A at 1- 2; North Carolina Petition at 5- 8 and Attachment A at 1- 2; Tennessee Petition at 5- 8 and Attachment A at 1- 2; Virginia Petition at 5- 8 and Attachment A at 1- 2. 27 Alabama Petition at 8- 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; Florida Petition at 8- 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; Georgia Petition at 8- 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; New York Petition at 8- 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; North Carolina Petition at 8- 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; Tennessee Petition at 8- 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; Virginia Petition at 8- 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; Sprint Supplement, May 14, 2004 at 8- 11. 47 C. F. R. § 54. 405. We note that ETCs must comply with state requirements in states that have Lifeline programs. See Lifeline and Link- Up, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WC Docket No. 03- 109, 19 FCC Rcd 8302, 8320 at para. 29 (2003). 28 Sprint Supplement, May 14, 2004 at 7- 11. Sprint has provided detailed information on how it will use universal service support to construct cell sites throughout the states in which it is designated as an ETC. Sprint November 4, 2004 Letter. Specifically, Sprint provides a list of over 500 planned new and over 500 planned upgraded cell sites, showing (for each site) the location, estimated population within the cell site service contour, proposed on- air date by calendar quarter, and proposed capital expenditures for 2004 and 2005. Pursuant to section 0.459 of the Commission’s rules, Sprint has requested that its lists of new and upgraded cell sites, with accompanying cost data, be treated as confidential and withheld from public inspection. Id. at 1- 2. We recognize that Sprint’s plans may change over time depending on consumer demand, fluctuation in universal service support, and related factors. See, e. g., Virginia Cellular Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 1571, para. 16. Because Sprint has supplemented its petitions to include detailed construction plans, we need not consider whether its previous more general commitments were sufficient to establish that it would offer the supported services. See CWA Comments at 9- 10 (objecting to sufficiency of Sprint’s submissions). 5 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 6 Sprint should be required to offer unlimited local calling to mirror the services offered by wireline carriers. 29 No such requirement is necessary because the Commission has not established a minimum local usage requirement and Sprint has pledged compliance with any and all minimum local usage requirements under applicable law. 30 We note that Sprint includes local usage in all of its calling plans. 31 Second, the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) argues that Sprint does not provide equal access to interexchange services. 32 Section 54.101( a)( 7) of the Commission’s rules states that one of the supported services is access to interexchange services, not equal access to those services. 33 Accordingly, we find sufficient Sprint’s showing that it will offer access to interexchange services. 12. Third, we disagree that ETC designation would be improper in this case due to the mobile nature of Sprint’s services. Specifically, certain commenters contend that the service area in which a customer resides may bear no relationship to the location where universal service support will actually be used by Sprint, and therefore that providing support would undermine the purpose of the universal service fund. 34 Similarly, some commenters argue that Sprint’s service is not a substitute for wireline service, constitutes only an adjunct service and is already available to the public. 35 The Commission has found previously, however, that universal service offerings enable competitive wireless ETCs to provide benefits to customers that do not have access to wireline phones, such as consumers that often must drive significant distances to places of employment, stores, schools, and other critical community locations. 36 We also note that the Commission recently sought comment on this and related issues. 37 Fourth, we reject the argument that Sprint does not currently offer certain supported services because its service is of poor quality. 38 We find that the alleged shortcomings in Sprint’s service quality, read in the light least favorable to Sprint, do not rise to the level of failure to provide service. Furthermore, Sprint has committed in this proceeding to meet service quality standards, including those set forth in the Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association (CTIA) Code. 39 Finally, we reject the New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc. ’s contention that, because the state public service commission 29 CenturyTel Comments at 5- 6; NASUCA November 6 and 10, 2003 Comments at 2. 30 See Sprint Supplemental Reply at 3- 4. 31 Id at 3- 4. 32 NASUCA November 6 and 10, 2003 Comments at 2. 33 47 C. F. R. §54.101( a)( 7). We note that in July 2002, four members of the Joint Board recommended adding equal access to interexchange service as a supported service. See Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service, Recommended Decision, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 17 FCC Rcd 14095, 14124- 27, paras. 75- 86 (2002). In July 2003, the Commission decided to defer consideration of this issue pending resolution of the Commission’s proceeding examining the rules relating to high- cost universal service support in competitive areas. See Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service, Order and Order on Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 18 FCC Rcd 15090, 15104, para. 33 (2003). See also infra para. 17 and n. 57. 34 CenturyTel Comments at 6. 35 Id. at 5- 6; GTA Comments at 2; NASUCA November 6 and 10, 2003 Comments at 1; NYSTA, Inc. November 6, 2003 Comments at 3- 4; NYSTA, Inc. May 28, 2004 Comments at 2. 36 See Highland Cellular Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 6432- 33, para. 23. 37 Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 96- 45, FCC 04- 127 (rel. June 8, 2004) (ETC High- Cost NPRM). 38 CWA Comments at 6- 9 (poor quality of service, based upon numerous unresolved complaints, indicates inability to provide service). See also NASUCA November 6 and 10, 2003 Comments at 2 (Sprint should be required to comply with state consumer protection rules). 39 Sprint May 14, 2004 Supplement at 7; see n. 56, infra. 6 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 7 lacks jurisdiction, and thus cannot enforce compliance, Sprint may not provide the supported services. 40 We note that if Sprint fails to fulfill the requirements of the Act, the Commission’s rules, or the terms of this Order after it begins receiving universal service support, the Commission has authority to revoke its ETC designation. 41 The Commission also may assess forfeitures for violations of Commission rules and orders. 42 13. Offering the Supported Services Using a Carrier’s Own Facilities. Sprint has demonstrated that it satisfies the requirement of section 214( e)( 1)( A) that it offer the supported services using either its own facilities or a combination of its own facilities and resale of another carrier’s services. 43 Sprint states that it intends to provide the supported services using its existing network infrastructure. 44 14. Advertising Supported Services. Sprint has demonstrated that it satisfies the requirement of section 214( e)( 1)( B) to advertise the availability of the supported services and the charges therefor using media of general distribution. 45 In addition to its current advertising, 46 Sprint has committed to specific methods to publicize the availability of Lifeline and Link- up service and improved service in unserved or underserved areas. 47 C. Public Interest Analysis 15. We conclude that it is “consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity” to designate Sprint as an ETC throughout its licensed non- rural service areas in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. 48 In determining whether the public interest is served, the Commission places the burden of proof upon the ETC applicant. 49 We note that the WCB previously has found designation of additional ETCs in areas served by non- rural telephone companies to be per se in the public interest based upon a demonstration that the requesting carrier complies with the statutory eligibility obligations of section 214( e)( 1) of the Act. 50 In the Virginia Cellular Order and the Highland Cellular Order, however, the Commission determined that designation 40 NYSTA, Inc. November 6, 2003 Comments at 4; NYSTA, Inc. May 28, 2004 Comments at 3. See also CenturyTel Comments at 5 (no state safeguards to curb abuse). 41 See 47 U. S. C. § 254( e). 42 See 47 U. S. C. § 503( b). 43 47 U. S. C. § 214( e)( 1)( A). 44 See Alabama Petition at 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; Florida Petition at 8- 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; Georgia Petition at 8- 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; New York Petition at 8- 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; North Carolina Petition at 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3; Tennessee Petition at 8 and Attachment A at 2- 3; Virginia Petition at 8- 9 and Attachment A at 2- 3. 45 47 C. F. R. § 214( e)( 1)( B). 46 Alabama Petition at 9 and Attachment A at 3; Florida Petition at 9 and Attachment A at 3; Georgia Petition at 9 and Attachment A at 3; New York Petition at 9 and Attachment A at 3; North Carolina Petition at 9 and Attachment A at 3; Tennessee Petition at 9 and Attachment A at 3; Virginia Petition at 9 and Attachment A at 3. 47 See Sprint Supplement, May 14, 2004 at 11- 13. 48 47 U. S. C. § 214( e)( 6). See Appendix B. 49 See Virginia Cellular Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 1574- 75, para. 26; Highland Cellular Order, 19 FCC Rcd 6431, para. 20. 50 See, e. g., Cellco Partnership d/ b/ a Bell Atlantic Mobile Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier, Memorandum Opinion and Order, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 16 FCC Rcd 39 (WCB 2000). 7 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 8 of an additional ETC in a non- rural telephone company’s study area based merely upon a showing that the requesting carrier complies with section 214( e)( 1) of the Act does not necessarily satisfy the public interest in every instance. 51 16. We conclude that Sprint has satisfied the burden of proof in establishing that its universal service offering in these seven states will provide benefits to non- rural consumers. While some commenters argue that Sprint has failed to demonstrate that its designation as an ETC would serve the public interest, 52 we reject these comments because Sprint has met the public interest standards for rural areas as outlined in the Virginia Cellular Order. Sprint’s public interest showing here is sufficient based on the detailed commitments Sprint has made to ensure that it provides high quality service throughout the proposed non- rural service areas. Specifically, despite only seeking designation in areas served by non- rural carriers, Sprint has made the same or similar commitments to those made by ETCs in rural areas in the Virginia Cellular Order and the Highland Cellular Order, including setting forth a specific plan for responding to requests for service, agreeing to provide the Commission with data on how high- cost support funds were used, and committing to publicize locally the construction of new facilities so that consumers are informed of provide improved service. 53 In addition, Sprint has made service quality commitments comparable to those made in the Virginia Cellular Order and the Highland Cellular Order, including commitments to comply with the CTIA Code for Wireless Service and to provide the Commission with consumer complaint data. 54 Because the Commission has previously found similar commitments sufficient to meet the public interest test in areas served by rural carriers, it would be hard to find that Sprint’s application in the present case fell short of meeting the applicable standard in areas served by non- rural centers. We therefore find that Sprint has demonstrated that its designation as an ETC in these non- rural study areas is consistent with the public interest, as required by section 214( e)( 6). 55 17. The Commission has sought comment on the Recommended Decision of the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service (Joint Board) concerning the process for designation of ETCs and the Commission’s rules regarding high- cost universal service support. 56 Several commenters argue that, in light of the impact that ETC designations have on the universal service fund, the Commission should not rule on any pending ETC petitions until the completion of the rulemaking proceeding, or that any 51 See Virginia Cellular Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 1575, para. 27; Highland Cellular Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 6431- 32, para. 21. 52 CenturyTel Comments at 2- 3 (seeks cost- benefit analysis); CWA Comments at 2- 5; GTA Comments at 1; NYSTA, Inc. November 6, 2003 Comments at 4- 5; NYSTA, Inc. May 28, 2004 Comments at 3- 4. 53 Virginia Cellular Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 1575- 1580, paras. 28- 35; Highland Cellular Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 6432-38, paras. 22- 33; Sprint Supplement, May 14, 2004 at 11- 13. 54 Sprint Supplement, May 14, 2004 at 7. Under the CTIA Consumer Code, wireless carriers agree to: (1) disclose rates and terms of service to customers; (2) make available maps showing where service is generally available; (3) provide contract terms to customers and confirm changes in service; (4) allow a trial period for new service; (5) provide specific disclosures in advertising; (6) separately identify carrier charges from taxes on billing statements; (7) provide customers the right to terminate service for changes to contract terms; (8) provide ready access to customer service; (9) promptly respond to consumer inquiries and complaints received from government agencies; and (10) abide by policies for protection of consumer privacy. 55 See 47 U. S. C. § 214( e)( 6). 56 ETC High- Cost NPRM, supra n. 37; Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service, Recommended Decision, CC Docket No. 96- 45, 19 FCC Rcd 4257 (2004) (Joint Board Recommended Decision). Among other things, the Joint Board recommended that the Commission adopt permissive federal guidelines for states to consider when designating ETCs under section 214 of the Act. Joint Board Recommended Decision, 19 FCC Rcd at 4258, para. 2. 8 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 9 changes resulting from that rulemaking should be applied to already granted ETC petitions. 57 Although these commenters raise important issues, we decline to delay ruling on pending ETC petitions at this time. We believe that grant of these ETC designations will not dramatically burden the universal service fund. For example, even assuming that Sprint captures each and every customer located in the affected study areas, the overall size of the high- cost support mechanisms would not significantly increase. 58 Nevertheless, we continue to be mindful of the impact on the universal service fund due to the rapid growth in the number of competitive ETCs. We note that the outcome of the rulemaking proceeding could potentially impact, among other things, the amount of support that Sprint and other competitive ETCs receive in the future. 18. We further disagree with the argument by Verizon and other commenters that we should not designate any additional competitive ETCs because doing so could have a significant impact on the access charge plan established by the Commission’s CALLS Order. 59 In the voluntarily negotiated CALLS plan, price cap carriers, inter alia, agreed to establish a $650 million target for interstate access support. Similar to other types of universal service support, interstate access support is portable to competitive ETCs. 60 Consequently, because interstate access support is targeted to $650 million, when a competitive ETC receives interstate access support, there is a corresponding reduction in support available to incumbent carriers. As the CALLS plan was being considered, portability of support to competitive ETCs and its relation to the $650 million target was contemplated. 61 Accordingly, the CALLS plan is functioning as contemplated by the agreement. We further note that the CALLS plan was designed for a five- year period, which ends in 2005. 62 As part of its consideration of the appropriate regulatory mechanism to replace the CALLS plan, the Commission can examine whether the interstate access support mechanism remains sufficient. 63 D. Designated Service Areas 19. We designate Sprint as an ETC in the requested service areas in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia served by non- rural telephone companies, as 57 See Verizon November 6 and 10, 2003, February 17, 2004 and March 11, 2004 Oppositions at 1 and attached Verizon Opposition to Alltel Designation status at 8- 10; NASUCA November 6 and 10, 2003 Comments at 2; GTA Comments at 3; NYSTA, Inc. November 6, 2003 Comments at 2, 5; NYSTA, Inc. May 28, 2004 Comments at 4. 58 For example, out of the seven states in which Sprint seeks designation, the incumbent carriers in Alabama receive the most high- cost support. The total amount of high- cost support received by such carriers is approximately 1.42% of the total high cost support available to all ETCs. 59 See generally Verizon November 6 and 10, 2003, February 17, 2004 and March 11, 2004 Oppositions at 1 and attached Verizon Opposition to Alltel Designation status at 8- 10; Verizon May 28, 2004 Supplemental Comments at 2- 7; CenturyTel Comments at 4- 5; CWA Comments at 2- 5. See Access Charge Reform, Sixth Report and Order, CC Docket Nos. 96- 262 and 94- 1, Report and Order, CC Docket No. 99- 249, Eleventh Report and Order, CC Docket No 96- 45, 15 FCC Rcd 12962 (2000) (subsequent history omitted) (CALLS Order). 60 See 47 C. F. R. § 54. 307( a). 61 See CTIA Reply Comments at 4- 5 (quoting Comments of Coalition for Affordable Local and Long Distance Services (CALLS), CC Docket Nos. 94- 1, 96- 45, 96- 262, 99- 249, filed Nov. 12, 1999); Sprint Reply at 3 (quoting same). 62 See CALLS Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 12977, 13046, paras. 35- 36, 201. 63 See id., 15 FCC Rcd at 12977, para. 36 (“[ A] s the term of the CALLS Proposal nears its end, we envision that the Commission will conduct a proceeding to determine whether and to what degree it can deregulate price cap LECs to reflect the existence of competition. At that time, the Commission can also examine whether the interstate access universal service support mechanism remains sufficient.”). 9 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 10 listed in Appendix B. 64 This designation is effective immediately. E. Regulatory Oversight 20. Sprint is obligated under section 254( e) of the Act to use high- cost support “only for the provision, maintenance, and upgrading of facilities and services for which support is intended” and is required under section 54.313 of the Commission’s rules to certify annually that it is in compliance with this requirement. 65 Sprint has certified to the Commission that, consistent with section 54.313 of the Commission’s rules, all federal high- cost support will be “used for the provision, maintenance and upgrading of facilities and services for which the support is intended, pursuant to Section 254( e)” of the Act in the area for which Sprint is designated as an ETC. 66 Sprint has further requested that the Commission find that Sprint has met the appropriate certification filing deadline in order for it to begin receiving support as of its ETC designation date. 67 Accordingly, we treat Sprint’s certification as timely so that it can begin receiving universal service support as of the date of its ETC designation. 68 21. Separate and in addition to its annual certification filing under rule section 54.313, Sprint has committed to submit records and documentation on an annual basis detailing: (1) its progress towards meeting its build- out plans; (2) the number of complaints per 1,000 handsets; and (3) how many requests for service from potential customers were unfulfilled for the past year. 69 We require Sprint to submit these additional data to the Commission and USAC on October 1 of each year beginning October 1, 2005. 70 We find that reliance on Sprint’s commitments is reasonable and consistent with the public interest, the Act, and the Fifth Circuit decision in Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. FCC. 71 We conclude that fulfillment of these additional reporting requirements will further the Commission’s goal of ensuring that Sprint satisfies its obligation under section 214( e) of the Act to provide supported services throughout its designated service area. We note that the Commission may institute an inquiry on its own motion to examine any ETC’s records and documentation to ensure that the high- cost support it receives is being used “only for the provision, maintenance, and upgrading of facilities and services” in the areas where it is designated as an ETC. 72 Sprint will be required to provide such records and documentation to 64 See Appendix B. 65 47 C. F. R. § 54. 313. 66 Sprint September 29, 2004 Letter. 67 Sprint November 4, 2004 Letter at 2- 3. 68 Section 54.313 provides that the certification must be filed by October 1 of the preceding calendar year to receive support beginning in the first quarter of a subsequent calendar year. 47 C. F. R. § 54. 313( d). If the October 1 deadline for first quarter support is missed, the certification must be filed by January 1 for support to begin in the second quarter, by April 1 for support to begin in the third quarter, and by July 1 for support to begin in the fourth quarter. See id. In instances where carriers are not subject to the jurisdiction of a state, the Commission allows an ETC to certify directly to the Commission and USAC that federal high- cost support will be used in a manner consistent with section 254( e). See 47 C. F. R. § 54.313( b). Moreover, although we accept Sprint’s certification as timely so that it can receive support as of its ETC designation date, consistent with the Commission’s rules, the relevant state commissions are not precluded from filing future certifications on behalf of Sprint stating that universal service support is being used for its intended purposes. See 47 C. F. R. § 54. 313. 69 See Sprint Supplement, May 14, 2004 at 7- 10. 70 Sprint’s initial submission concerning consumer complaints per 1, 000 handsets and unfulfilled service requests will include data from the date ETC designation is granted through June 30, 2005. Future submissions concerning consumer complaints and unfulfilled service requests will include data from July 1 of the previous calendar year through June 30 of the reporting calendar year. 71 Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. FCC, 183 F. 3d 393, 417- 18 (5 th Cir. 1999). 72 47 U. S. C. §§ 220, 403; 47 C. F. R. § 54. 313. 10 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 11 the Commission and USAC upon request. We further emphasize that if Sprint fails to fulfill the requirements of the Act, the Commission’s rules, or the terms of this Order after it begins receiving universal service support, the Commission has authority to revoke its ETC designation. 73 The Commission also may assess forfeitures for violations of Commission rules and orders. 74 IV. ANTI- DRUG ABUSE ACT CERTIFICATION 22. Pursuant to section 5301 of the Anti- Drug Abuse Act of 1988, no applicant is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. 75 This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002( b) of the Commission’s rules. 76 Sprint has provided certifications consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. 77 We find that Sprint has satisfied the requirements of the Anti- Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001- 1.2003 of the Commission’s rules. 78 V. ORDERING CLAUSES 23. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214( e)( 6) of the Communications Act, 47 U. S. C. § 214( e)( 6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.131 and 0. 331 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. §§ 0.131 and 0.331, Sprint Communications, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER throughout its licensed non-rural service area in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia to the extent described herein. 24. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau to the Alabama Public Service Commission, the Florida Public Service Commission, the Georgia Public Service Commission, the New York Public Service Commission, the North Carolina Utilities Commission, the Tennessee Regulatory Authority, the Virginia State Corporation Commission, and the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John B. Muleta Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 73 See Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd at 15174, para. 15. See also 47 U. S. C. § 254( e). 74 See 47 U. S. C. § 503( b). 75 47 U. S. C. § 1.2002( a); 21 U. S. C. § 862. 76 See ETC Procedures PN, 12 FCC Rcd at 22949. Section 1.2002( b) provides that a “party to the application” shall include: “( 1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting/ and or non- voting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the applicant is a partnership, all non- limited partners and any limited partners holding a 5% or more interest in the partnership.” 47 C. F. R. § 1.2002( b). 77 See Alabama Petition at 12 and Exhibit A at 3; Florida Petition at 12 and Exhibit A at 3; Georgia Petition at 12 and Exhibit A at 3; New York Petition at 12 and Exhibit A at 3; North Carolina Petition at 12 and Exhibit A at 3; Tennessee Petition at 12 and Exhibit A at 3; Virginia Petition at 12 and Exhibit A at 3. 78 47 C. F. R. §§ 1. 2001- 2003. 11 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 12 Appendix A Parties Filing Comments, Reply Comments, Oppositions, Supplemental Comments Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Alabama Comments Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association (CTIA) (11/ 6/ 03) National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) (11/ 6/ 03) Opposition Verizon Communications, Inc. (Verizon) (11/ 6/ 03) Reply Comments Sprint Corporation (Sprint) (11/ 20/ 03) Supplement Sprint (5/ 14/ 04) Supplemental Comments CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC, CenturyTel of Eagle, Inc., and CenturyTel, Inc. (CenturyTel) (5/ 28/ 04) Communications Workers of America (CWA) (5/ 28/ 04) Verizon (5/ 28/ 04) Supplemental Reply Comments Sprint (6/ 9/ 04) Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Florida Comments CTIA (2/ 17/ 04) Opposition Verizon (2/ 17/ 04) Reply Comments Sprint (3/ 1/ 04) Supplement Sprint (5/ 14/ 04) Supplemental Comments Verizon (5/ 28/ 04) CWA (5/ 28/ 04) Supplemental Reply Comments Sprint (6/ 9/ 04) 12 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 13 Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Georgia Comments CTIA (11/ 6/ 03) Georgia Telephone Association (GTA) (11/ 6/ 03) NASUCA (11/ 6/ 03) Opposition Verizon (11/ 6/ 03) Reply Comments Sprint (11/ 20/ 03) Supplement Sprint (5/ 14/ 04) Supplemental Comments CWA (5/ 28/ 04) Verizon (5/ 28/ 04) Supplemental Reply Comments Sprint (6/ 9/ 04) Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of New York Comments CTIA (11/ 06/ 03) NASUCA (11/ 6/ 03) New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc. (NYSTA, Inc.) (11/ 6/ 03) Opposition Verizon (11/ 6/ 03) Reply Comments Sprint (11/ 20/ 03) Supplement Sprint (5/ 14/ 04) Supplemental Comments CWA (5/ 28/ 04) NYSTA, Inc. (5/ 28/ 04) Verizon (5/ 28/ 04) Supplemental Reply Comments Sprint (6/ 9/ 04) 13 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 14 Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of North Carolina Comments CTIA (3/ 11/ 04) Opposition Verizon (3/ 11/ 04) Reply Comments Sprint (3/ 25/ 04) Supplement Sprint (5/ 14/ 04) Supplemental Comments CWA (5/ 28/ 04) Verizon (5/ 28/ 04) Supplemental Reply Comments Sprint (6/ 9/ 04) Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Tennessee Comments CTIA (11/ 24/ 03) NASUCA (11/ 10/ 03) Opposition Verizon (11/ 10/ 03) Reply Comments Sprint (11/ 20/ 03) Supplement Sprint (5/ 14/ 04) Supplemental Comments CWA (5/ 28/ 04) Verizon (5/ 28/ 04) Supplemental Reply Comments Sprint (6/ 9/ 04) 14 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 15 Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the Commonwealth of Virginia Comments CTIA (11/ 6/ 03) NASUCA (11/ 6/ 03) Opposition Verizon (11/ 6/ 03) Reply Comments Sprint (11/ 20/ 04) Supplement Sprint (5/ 14/ 04) Supplemental Comments CWA (5/ 28/ 04) Verizon (5/ 28/ 04) Supplemental Reply Comments Sprint (6/ 9/ 04) 15 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 16 Alabama Appendix B NonRural ILEC Wire Centers Served by Sprint Wireless Division For Which ETC Status is Requested BELLSOUTH TELECOMM INC DBA SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TEL ALBSALMA ALCYALMT ALVLALMA ANTNALLE ANTNALMT ANTNALOX ATHNALER ATHNALMA ATTLALNM AUBNALMA BLFNALMA BOAZALMA BRHMALCH BRHMALCP BRHMALEL BRHMALEN BRHMALEW BRHMALFO BRHMALFS BRHMALHW BRHMALMT BRHMALOM BRHMALOX BRHMALRC BRHMALTA BRHMALVA BRHMALWE BRHMALWL BRPTALMA BRTOALMA BSMRALBP BSMRALBU BSMRALHT BSMRALMA BWDNGAMA BYMNALMA CALRALMA CHBGALMA CHLSALMA CLANALMA CLMBALMA CLMNALFA CLMNALJC CLMNALMA CNTMFLLE CRDVALMA CRLDALMA DCTRALMT DDVLALMA DMPLALMA DORAALMA EUTWALBO EUTWALMA EVRGALMA FLRNALMA FMTNALMT FRHPALMA FTDPALMA FTPYALMA GDSDALHS GDSDALMT GDSDALRD GDWRALMA GNBOALMA GRDLALNM GRLYALMA GTVLALNM GYVLALNM HLVIALMA HNVIALLW HNVIALMT HNVIALPW HNVIALRA HNVIALRW HNVIALUN HNVLALBR HNVLALNM HRTSALNM HRTSALPE HZGRALMA JCVLALMA JSPRALMT KLLNALMA LFYTALRS LGTNALMA LNDNALMA LVTNALLA LXTNALMA MARNALNM MDSNALNM MNFDALMA MNTVALNM MOBLALAP MOBLALAZ MOBLALBF MOBLALOS MOBLALPR MOBLALSA MOBLALSE MOBLALSF MOBLALSH MOBLALSK MOBLALTH MOLTALNM MTGMALDA MTGMALMB MTGMALMT MTGMALNO MTVRALMA OHTCALMA OPLKALMT PDMTALMA PHCYALFM PHCYALMA PNSNALMA PRSHALNM PRVLALMA RLVLALMA RRVLALMA SELMALMT SHFDALMT SYLCALMT TLDGALMA TLDGALRF TLLPGAES TROYALMA TSCLALDH TSCLALMT TSCLALNO TSKGALMA TWCKALMA UNTWALNM VNCNALMA WBTNALNM WRRRALNM WTMPALMA YORKALMA CENTURYTEL TEL OF ALABAMA, LLC (SOUTHERN) ARITALXA BNKSALXA BRNDALXA DLVLALXA DTHNALXA ECHOALXA ENTRALXA FRHMALXA GNVLALXA GRGNALXA HDLDALXA MCKNALXA MLCYALXA NWBCALXA NWTNALXA NWVIALXA OZRKALXA SLCMALXA WCBGALXA CENTURY TEL OF ALABAMA, LLC (NORTHERN) ACVLALXA ALBRALXA BLBTALXA CHLFALXA CRTNALXA DPILALXA DELTALXA ETVLALXA FLVLALXA FWRVALXA GDBAALXA GORDALXA HFLNALXA IRSEALXA JMSNALXA LECTALXA LNCLALXA MENTALXA MSSYALXA NTSLALXA ODRGALXA ORVLALXA PANLALXA PHBLALXA PLCYALXA RCFRALXA RFRMALXA THRSALXA TLLSALXA TSVLALXA VYHDALXA 16 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 17 Florida Appendix B NonRural ILEC Wire Centers Served by Sprint Wireless Division For Which ETC Status is Requested VERIZON FLORIDA INC. ABDLFLXA ALTRFLXA BARTFLXA BRBAFLXA BRTNFLXX PLSLFLXA ANMRFLXA STGRFLXA CLWRFLXA CNSDFLXA DNDNFLXA INRKFLXX PNLSFLXA ENWDFLXA FRSTFLXA DUNDFLXA HNCYFLXA HNCYFLXN POINFLXA HDSNFLXA MNLKFLXA INLKFLXA BBPKFLXA LKWLFLXA LKWLFLXE LKLDFLXA LKLDFLXE LKLDFLXN HGLDFLXA LRGOFLXA BRJTFLXA MLBYFLXA MYCYFLXA NRPTFLXA NPRCFLXA SNSPFLXA PLMTFLXA PRSHFLXA PTCYFLXA PNCRFLXA PKCYFLXA NRSDFLXA SPRGFLXA SRSTFLXA SSDSFLXA SARKFLXA SEKYFLXA LGBKFLXA BAYUFLXA FHSDFLXA GNDYFLXA LLMNFLXA NGBHFLXA PSDNFLXA SKWYFLXA SPBGFLXA SPBGFLXS SGBEFLXA THNTFLXA BRNDFLXA KYSTFLXA OLDSFLXA CRWDFLXA SLSPFLXA TMTRFLXA UNVRFLXA ALFAFLXA BHPKFLXA HYPKFLXA SMNLFLXA SWTHFLXA TAMPFLXE TAMPFLXX WLCRFLXA WSSDFLXA YBCTFLXA LNLKFLXA LUTZFLXA WLCHFLXA RSKNFLXA WIMMFLXA TRSPFLXA VENCFLXA VENCFLXS OSPRFLXA LKALFLXA WNHNFLXC CYGRFLXA ZPHYFLXA BELLSOUTH TELECOMM INC DBA SOUTHERN BELL TEL & TEL ARCHFLMA BLDWFLMA BLGLFLMA BCRTFLBT BCRTFLMA BCRTFLSA BYBHFLMA BRSNFLMA BKVLFLJF BNNLFLMA CNTMFLLE CDKYFLMA CFLDFLMA CHPLFLJA COCOFLMA CCBHFLAF CCBHFLMA PMBHFLCS CSCYFLBA DYBHFLFN DYBHFLMA DYBHFLOB DYBHFLPO DYBHFLOS DBRYFLMA DRBHFLMA DELDFLMA DLSPFLMA DLBHFLKP DLBHFLMA DBRYFLDL DNLNFLWM EORNFLMA EGLLFLBG EGLLFLIH FRBHFLFP FLBHFLMA FTGRFLMA FTPRFLMA FTLDFLCR FTLDFLCY FTLDFLJA FTLDFLMR FTLDFLOA FTLDFLPL FTLDFLSG FTLDFLSU FTLDFLWN GSVLFLMA GSVLFLNW GENVFLMA GLBRFLMC HAVNFLMA HWTHFLMA HBSDFLMA HLNVFLMA HLWDFLHA HLWDFLMA HLWDFLPE HLWDFLWH HMSTFLEA HMSTFLHM HMSTFLNA JCBHFLMA JCBHFLAB JCBHFLSP JCVLFLAR JCVLFLBW JCVLFLCL JCVLFLFC JCVLFLIA JCVLFLJT JCVLFLLF JCVLFLNO JCVLFLOW JCVLFLRV JCVLFLSJ JCVLFLSM JCVLFLWC MNDRFLAV MNDRFLLO MNDRFLLW JPTRFLMA KYLRFLLS NKLRFLMA BGPIFLMA KYLRFLMA KYWSFLMA MRTHFLVE SGKYFLMA ISLMFLMA KYHGFLMA LKCYFLMA LKMRFLMA LYHNFLOH MXVLFLMA MLBRFLMA COCOFLME MIAMFLAE MIAMFLAL MIAMFLAP MIAMFLBA MIAMFLBC MIAMFLBR MIAMFLCA MIAMFLFL MIAMFLHL MIAMFLNM MIAMFLNS MIAMFLOL MIAMFLPB MIAMFLPL MIAMFLRR MIAMFLSH MIAMFLSO MIAMFLWD MIAMFLWM MIAMFLGR MIAMFLIC MIAMFLKE MIAMFLME MIAMFLDB MCNPFLMA MICCFLBB MDBGFLPM MLTNFLRA MNSNFLMA NWBYFLMA NDADFLAC NDADFLBR NDADFLGG NDADFLOL NSBHFLMA OKHLFLMA OLTWFLLN ORPKFLMA ORPKFLRW ORLDFLAP ORLDFLCL ORLDFLMA ORLDFLPC ORLDFLPH ORLDFLSA OVIDFLCA PACEFLPV PAHKFLMA PLTKFLMA PLCSFLMA PNCYFLCA PNCYFLMA GCSPFLCN PNSCFLBL PNSCFLFP PNSCFLHC PNSCFLPB PNSCFLWA PRRNFLMA PRSNFLFD PCBHFLNT PNVDFLMA PMPKFLMA PMBHFLFE PMBHFLMA PMBHFLTA PMBHFLNP HTISFLMA PTSLFLMA PTSLFLSO SNFRFLMA SBSTFLFE SBSTFLMA STAGFLWG STAGFLBS STAGFLMA STAGFLSH STRTFLMA SYHSFLCC TTVLFLMA TRENFLMA VERNFLMA VRBHFLBE VRBHFLMA WWSPFLHI WWSPFLSH WELKFLMA WPBHFLAN WPBHFLGA WPBHFLGR WPBHFLHH WPBHFLLE WPBHFLRB WPBHFLRP YNTWFLMA YNFNFLMA YULEFLMA 17 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 18 Georgia Appendix B NonRural ILEC Wire Centers Served by Sprint Wireless Division For Which ETC Status is Requested BELLSOUTH TELECOMM INC DBA SOUTHERN BELL TEL & TEL AIVLGAMA ALBYGAMA APNGGAES ATHNGAMA ATLNGAAD ATLNGABH ATLNGABU ATLNGACD ATLNGACS ATLNGAEL ATLNGAEP ATLNGAFP ATLNGAGR ATLNGAHR ATLNGAIC ATLNGALA ATLNGAPP ATLNGASS ATLNGATH ATLNGAWD ATLNGAWE CHMBGAMA LGVLGACS LLBNGAMA LTHNGAJS PANLGAMA SNLVGAMA SNMTGALR TUKRGAMA ALPRGAMA DLTHGAHS DNWDGAMA LRVLGAOS NRCRGAMA RSWLGAMA ASTLGAMA DGVLGAMA DLLSGAES PWSPGAAS SMYRGAMA ACWOGAMA MRTTGAEA MRTTGAMA SMYRGAPF WDSTGACR FRBNGAEB FYVLGASG HMPNGAJW JNBOGAMA MCDNGAGS MRRWGAMA PLMTGAMA PTCYGAMA RVDLGAMA STBRGANH AGSTGAAU AGSTGAFL AGSTGAMT AGSTGATH BNBRGAMA BRVIGAMA BLCSGAES BGRTGAMA BWDNGAMA BRMNGAES BRWKGAMA BCHNGAES BUFRGABH CLHNGAES CRTNGAMA CRVLGAMA CVSPGAMA CDTWGAMA CHTGTNBR CHTGTNRO CHTGTNSE CXTNGAMA CLMTGAMA CCHRGAMA CLMBGABV CLMBGAMT CLMBGAMW CNYRGAMA CORDGAMA CVTNGAMT CMNGGAMA CSSTGAMA DBLNGAMA FLBRGAMA FRSYGAMA FTVYGAMA GSVLGAMA GTVLGAMA GNBOGAES GRFNGAMA HMTNGAMA HRLMGAMA HPHZGAES HGVLGAMA JCSNGAMA JKISGAMA KGTNGAMA LGRNGAMA LKPKGAMA LSBGGAMA LULAGAMA LMKNGAMA LTVLGACS MACNGAGP MACNGAMT MACNGAVN MDSNGAMA MNTIGAMA NWNNGAMA PNMTGAMA POLRGAMA RCLDGAMA ROMEGATL RPVLGAMA RYTNGAMA RTLGGAMA SVNHGABS SVNHGADE SVNHGAGC SVNHGASI SVNHGAWB SVNHGAWI SENOGAMA SMVLGAMA SCCRGAMA SPRKGAMA SPRTGAMA SSISGAES SYLVGAES TLLPGAES TMPLGAMA THVLGAMA THSNGAMA TFTNGAMA TBISGAMA VLDSGAMA VDALGAMA VLRCGAES WRRBGAMA WRTNGAMA WTVLGAES WYCRGAMA WYBOGAES WRNSGAMA 18 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 19 New York Appendix B NonRural ILEC Wire Centers Served by Sprint Wireless Division For Which ETC Status is Requested FRONTIER TELEPHONE OF ROCHESTER ATLNNYXA AVONNYXA BCPTNYXA BITNNYXA BRGNNYXA CANDNYXA CCVLNYXA CHCNNYXA CLDNNYXA DNSVNYXA ERCHNYXA FAPTNYXB FRTNNYXA GENSNYXA HMLCNYXA HMLNNYXA HNRTNYXA HOFLNYXA LCSRNYXA LIVNNYXA LROYNYXA MTMRNYXA NPLSNYXA PNFDNYXA PVLNNYXA ROCHNYXB ROCHNYXC ROCHNYXD ROCHNYXE ROCHNYXF ROCHNYXG ROCHNYXH ROCHNYXJ ROCHNYXK SCVLNYXA SPWRNYXA VCTRNYXA WBSTNYXA WBSTNYXB WYLDNYXA VERIZON NEW YORK, INC. AKRNNYAK ALBNNYAI ALBYNYGD ALBYNYSS ALBYNYWA ALDNNYAD ALMTNYAL AMBRNYAB AMHRNYMP AMSTNYPE ANGENYAG ANGLNYAO ARPTNYAR ARVGNYAV ATTCNYAT ATWPNYAW AUBNNYAU AVOCNYAC AVPKNYAV AXBANYAX BALSNYBA BATHNYBH BATVNYBT BAVLNYBV BBYLNYBN BDVGNYBV BECNNYBE BERNNYBR BFLONYBA BFLONYEL BFLONYFR BFLONYHE BFLONYMA BFLONYSP BGFLNYBF BLFSNYBZ BLLNNYBG BLMTNYBM BLRVNYBC BNGHNYHY BNGHNYRO BRKRNYBK BRPTNYBP BRWDNYBW BRWSNYBW BSTNNYBN BYRNNYBY BYSHNYBY CAIRNYCA CBLSNYZB CHCKNYCE CHKTNYFR CHPQNYCP CICRNYCJ CLAYNYOS CLCNNYCN CLCRNYCC CLCTNYCC CLEVNYCE CLNCNYBA CLPKNYCP CLTNNYZI CLVLNYCK CLVRNYCV CLYDNYCY CMDNNYZM CMLSNYID CMLSNYON CMMKNYCM CMPBNYCP CNBRNYCD CNDLNYCL CNGRNYCN CNSRNYCX CNSTNYZA CNTNNYZO CNTTNYCI CPNHNYZP CPTWNYZW CRHDNYCH CRLDNYCR CRMLNYCL CRNGNYCG CRNWNYCW CRTHNYZG CSPPNYCS CSTNNYCS CTBRNYCB CTCHNYCU CTNGNYCH CTONNYZN CTRGNYSO CTSKNYCT CUBANYEM CYTNNYZY DBFYNYDF DLGVNYDG DLMRNYDA DLSNNYDL DNKRNYDK DNMRNYDN DRBYNYDB DRPKNYDP DVPLNYDP DVPTNYDT EAURNYEA EDENNYED EGLVNYGL EGNBNYEG EHTNNYEH ELBANYEB ELCVNYEV ELDPNYEU ELVLNYEL EMIRNYEM ENDCNYEN ENPTNYEN ESPRNYER EVMLNYEI FLBGNYFB FLPKNYFP FRDLNYFM FRPTNYFP FRSHNYFS FSHKNYLD FSVLNYFL FTANNYFA FYTTNYFY FYVLNYFV GDISNYGI GENVNYGN GLCVNYGC GLFLNYGF GLWYNYGW GNBGNYFV GPTSNYGP GRCTNYGC GRCYNYGC GRLKNYGL GRNKNYGN GRSNNYGA GRTNNYGT GRVGNYGV GRVINYGE GSPTNYGP GWNDNYGD HCVLNYHV HDFLNYMS HDSNNYHD HGLDNYHG HHFLNYHF HIFLNYHF HLLDNYHO HLLYNYHE HMBGNYHB HMBYNYHB HMPSNYHS HNDLNYHI HNSTNYHU HNTRNYHN HOMRNYHM HRFRNYHR HRKMNYHC HRNLNYHL HRSNNYHN HRWKNYHW HSFLNYHS HSHDNYHH HVTNNYHX HYPKNYHK ILINNYIL ITHCNYIH ITHCNYPG JAVANYJA JFVLNYJF JHCYNYJC JNVLNYJV JRDNNYJD KENDNYKD KGTNNYKG KNVYNYKV KRHNNYKR KTBANYKB KTNHNYKA LBRTNYLB LCPTNYLK LFRVNYLE LFYTNYLF LHSTNYLH LKGRNYLR LKKTNYLK LKPCNYLA LMSTNYLM LNBHNYLB LNCSNYLC LNNGNYLG LRMTNYLA LSTNNYLW LTFLNYLS LTHMNYTS LTVYNYLI LVMNNYLV LVTWNYLT LXTNNYLX LYBRNYLB LYNSNYLY LYVLNYLL MACDNYMC MAINNYME MARNNYMR MARVNYMV MCDGNYMD MCGRNYMG MCHVNYMC MCLNNYMZ MDPTNYMP MDRDNYMK MEDNNYPA MEXCNYMX MHPCNYMP MINLNYMI MINONYMI MLBKNYML MLFRNYMU MLTNNYMN MMRNNYMA MNHSNYMH MNTINYMT MNTKNYMT MORVNYMO MRBONYMB MSPQNYMP MSTCNYMC MTKSNYMK MTVRNYMV NCHLNYNL NCLNNYNO NCLVNYNC NGFLNY76 NGFLNYPO NGFLNYWO NGRNNYNG NRFLNYNO NROSNYNR NRWDNYND NSYRNYNS NWBRNYNW NWBRNYWT NWCYNYNC NWFDNYNF NWFNNYMA NWPLNYNP NWRCNYNR NWRKNYNK NWWNNYNW NYACNYNK NYCKNY14 NYCKNY71 19 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 20 New York (Cont’d) Appendix B NonRural ILEC Wire Centers Served by Sprint Wireless Division For Which ETC Status is Requested VERIZON NEW YORK, INC. NYCKNY77 NYCKNYAI NYCKNYAL NYCKNYAR NYCKNYAU NYCKNYAY NYCKNYBR NYCKNYBU NYCKNYCL NYCKNYFA NYCKNYFT NYCKNYKP NYCKNYLA NYCKNYRA NYCKNYTY NYCKNYWM NYCMNY13 NYCMNY18 NYCMNY30 NYCMNY36 NYCMNY37 NYCMNY42 NYCMNY50 NYCMNY56 NYCMNY73 NYCMNY79 NYCMNY97 NYCMNYBS NYCMNYCA NYCMNYMN NYCMNYTH NYCMNYVS NYCMNYWA NYCMNYWS NYCMNYZO NYCQNYAS NYCQNYBA NYCQNYBH NYCQNYCO NYCQNYFH NYCQNYFL NYCQNYFR NYCQNYHS NYCQNYIA NYCQNYJA NYCQNYLI NYCQNYLN NYCQNYNJ NYCQNYNW NYCQNYOP NYCQNYRH NYCRNYND NYCRNYNS NYCRNYSS NYCRNYWS NYCXNYCI NYCXNYCR NYCXNYGC NYCXNYHO NYCXNYJE NYCXNYKB NYCXNYMH NYCXNYTB NYCXNYTR OCBHNYOB OKFDNYOK OLENNYHA ONEDNYOD ONNTNYOA ONTRNYON ORBGNYOB ORPKNYST OSNGNYOS OSWGNYOS OTEGNYOT OWEGNYOW OWSCNYOO OYBANYOY PASNNYPN PCHGNYPH PERUNYPE PGHKNYSH PGHKNYSP PHLANYPF PHMTNYPM PJSTNYPJ PT PKSKNYPS PLBGNYPB PLMYNYPY PLVLNYPL PLVWNYPV PNYNNYPN POMNNYPO PPRGNYPP PRDYNYPD PRISNYPA PRRVNYNP PRTVNYPV PSVLNYPV PTCHNYPC PTNMNYPX PTSDNYPS PTTWNYPI PTVYNYPY PTWANYPW PVYDNYPD PWNGNYSS RCVLNYRH RDCKNYRC RNKNNYRN RNLKNYRL RODLNYRD ROMENYRM RSLNNYRO RSVLNYRV RVHDNYRV RYE NYRY SATNNYSN SAVNNYSN SBTHNYSB SCDLNYSR SCHNNYSC SCHRNYQH SCHVNYQN SDTNNYPI SFRNNYSU SGHRNYSG SGRTNYSG SHHMNYSH SKNTNYSE SLCKNYSI SLDNNYSE SLMNNYWW SLTSNYSL SMTWNYSM SNFLNYSL SODSNYSD SPVLNYWM SPVYNYSV SRLKNYQL SRNCNYQC SRSPNYSR SSCHNYSO SSLMNYSS STKTNYSK SYBHNYQY SYOSNYSY SYRCNYDD SYRCNYEP SYRCNYGS SYRCNYJS SYRCNYSA SYRCNYSU SYVLNYSA THRSNYTH TKHONYTU TLLYNYTY TNVLNYTN TNWNNYTW TROYNY03 TROYNY04 TRTWNYTT TUXDNYTX UTICNYUT VLFLNYVF VRHVNYVR WBYNNYWE WDMRNYFR WDPTNYWT WERLNYWL WHBHNYWB WHBONYWP WHPLNYWP WHTHNYUH WHVRNYWH WLBONYUB WLCTNYWC WLSNNYME WLVLNYNM WMSNNYWN WNDLNYWD WNKHNYWK WNTGNYWT WPFLNYWF WRBGNYWU WRCSNYUC WSNCNYUN WSVLNYNC WTGLNYWG WTPTNYWR WTRLNYWT WTTWNYUN WVRLNYWV WWVLNYWW YNKRNYYN YNTWNYYT YPHNNYYA YRTWNYYT 20 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 21 North Carolina Appendix B NonRural ILEC Wire Centers Served by Sprint Wireless Division For Which ETC Status is Requested BELLSOUTH TELECOMM INC DBA SOUTHERN BELL TEL & TEL (SAC 235193) ARSNNCMA APEXNCCE BLMTNCCE BSCYNCMA BURLNCDA BURLNCEL BURLNCHA CRBHNCCE CARYNCCE CARYNCWS CLMTNCMA CPHLNCRO CHRLNCBO CHRLNCCA CHRLNCCE CHRLNCCR CHRLNCDE CHRLNCER CHRLNCMI CHRLNCRE CHRLNCSH CHRLNCTH CHRLNCUN CHRLNCOD CHRLNCLP CHVLNCCE CLEVNCMA DVSNNCPO DNVRNCMA ELBONCMA FAMTNCMA GSTANCDA GSTANCSO GTWDNCMA GBSNNCMA GLBONCMA GNHMNCMA GNBONCAP GNBONCAS GNBONCEU GNBONCHO GNBONCLA GNBONCMC GNBONCPG GRVRNCMA HMLTNCMA HSVLNCCE JULNNCMA KGMTNCMA KNDLNCCE LTMRNCCE LRBGNCMA LNTNNCMA LNTNNCVA LCSTNCMA LWLLNCMA LMTNNCMA MADNNCCE MLTNNCMA MNTINCMA MTHLNCMA MTOLNCCE PMBRNCCE RLGHNCDU RLGHNCGA RLGHNCGL RLGHNCHO RLGHNCJO RLGHNCMO RLGHNCSB RLGHNCSI RDVLNCMA RDVLNCSI RCHMNCMA RWLDNCMA RFFNNCMA SLBRNCMA SXPHNCMA SELMNCMA SHLBNCMA STNLNCCE SSVLNCMA SSVLNCJE STPNNCMA SRFDNCCE TRMNNCMA WNDLNCPI WNSLNCAR WNSLNCCL WNSLNCFI WNSLNCGL WNSLNCLE WNSLNCVI WNSLNCWA WNSLNCWH WGVLNCMA ZBLNNCCE VERIZON SOUTH INC.- NC (SAC 230479) ALTNNCXA CRDMNCXA CRDMNCXM DRHMNCXB DRHMNCXC DRHMNCXD DRHMNCXG DRHMNCXA DRHMNCXM DRHMNCXT GSCKNCXA MONRNCXA DRHMNCXE DRHMNCXH NORTH STATE TELEPHONE CO. DBA NORTH STATE COMM (SAC 230491) HGPNNCXA HGPNNCXD HGPNNCXC HGPNNCXE HGPNNCXF RNMNNCXA THVLNCXA 21 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 22 Tennessee Appendix B NonRural ILEC Wire Centers Served by Sprint Wireless Division For Which ETC Status is Requested BELLSOUTH TELECOMM INC DBA SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TEL ACHLTNMT ARTNTNMT ASCYTNMA ATHNTNMA BLGPTNMA BLLSTNMA BLNCTNMT BNTNTNMT BWVLTNMA CHRLTNMT CHTGTNBR CHTGTNDT CHTGTNHT CHTGTNMV CHTGTNNS CHTGTNRB CHTGTNRO CHTGTNSE CHTGTNSM CHTNTNMT CLEVTNMA CLMATNMA CLTNTNMA CLVLTNMA CMDNTNMA CNVLTNMA CRPLTNMA CRTHTNMA CRVLTNMA CULKTNMA CVTNTNMT DKSNTNMT DNRGTNMA DYBGTNMA DYTNTNMA EAVLTNMA FIVLTNMA FKLNTNCC FKLNTNMA FRDNTNMA FRVWTNMT GALLTNMA GBSNTNMT GDVLTNMA GNBRTNMA GRNBTNMA GTBGTNMT GTWSTNSW HDVLTNMA HIMNTNMA HLLSTNMT HMBLTNMA HNNGTNMA HNSNTNMT HNTGTNMA HRFRTNMA HTVLTNMA JCSNTNMA JCSNTNNS JFCYTNMA JSPRTNMT KGTNTNMT KNVLTNBE KNVLTNFC KNVLTNMA KNVLTNWH KNVLTNYH LBNNTNMA LFLTTNMA LKCYTNMA LNCYTNMA LODNTNMA LWBGTNMA LXTNTNMA LYBGTNMT LYLSTNMA LYVLTNMA MAVLTNMA MCWNTNMT MDVITNMT MEDNTNMA MILNTNMA MMPHTNBA MMPHTNCK MMPHTNCT MMPHTNEL MMPHTNFR MMPHTNGT MMPHTNHP MMPHTNMA MMPHTNMT MMPHTNOA MMPHTNSL MMPHTNST MMPHTNWW MNCHTNMA MNPLTNMA MRBOTNMA MRTWTNMA MSCTTNMT MSCWTNMA MYVLTNMA NRRSTNMA NSVLTNAP NSVLTNBH NSVLTNBV NSVLTNBW NSVLTNCD NSVLTNCH NSVLTNDO NSVLTNHH NSVLTNIN NSVLTNMC NSVLTNMT NSVLTNST NSVLTNUN NSVLTNWC NSVLTNWM NWBRTNMA NWPTTNMT OKRGTNMT OLHCTNMA OLSPTNMA PLSKTNMA PSVWTNMT PTLDTNMA RDGLTNMA RKWDTNMA RPLYTNMA RRVLTNMA SANGTNMT SDDSTNMA SEWNTNMW SHVLTNMA SMYRTNMA SNTFTNMA SOVLTNMT SPBGTNMA SPFDTNMA SPHLTNMT SRVLTNMA SVVLTNMT SWTWTNMT TPVLTNMA TLLHTNMA TRINTNMA TROYTNMT TRTNTNMA UNCYTNMA WHBLTNMT WHHSTNMA WHPITNMA WHVLTNMT WHWLTNMA WNCHTNMA WRTRTNMT WTTWTNMA WVRLTNMT 22 Federal Communications Commission DA 04- 3617 23 Virginia Appendix B NonRural ILEC Wire Centers Served by Sprint Wireless Division For Which ETC Status is Requested VERIZON SOUTH INC.- VA (CONTEL) ALBRVAXA AMHRVAXA APMTVAXA ARCLVAXA BRWRVAXA BRWYVAXA BWLGVAXA BYKNVAXA BYTNVAXA CHKTVAXA CHNCVAXA CHNCVAXB CLBHVAXA CLMTVAXA CPRNVAXA CRLDVAXA CRTDVAXA DAWNVAXA DHLGVAXA DLCYVAXA DLLSVAXA DNDRVAXA DSPAVAXA DSWLVAXA DTVLVAXA DYTNVAXA EDOMVAXA EKTNVAXA EMPRVAXA EPFKVAXA FKLNVAXB FRNHVAXA GLCSVAXA GRBRVAXA GRBRVAXB GRTSVAXA HAYSVAXA HCKRVAXA HITNVAXA HLLDVAXA HNVRVAXA HRBGVAXA HYMRVAXA INHLVAXA IVORVAXA IVTNVAXA JRRTVAXA KGGRVAXA KGQNVAXA KGWLVAXA KMNKVAXA KZTWVAXA LDYSVAXA LRTNVAXA LRVLVAXA LVLYVAXA MGVLVAXA MNSSVAXA MTHWVAXA NKVLVAXA OCQNVAXA OLCHVAXA PRANVAXA PRANVAXB PTRYVAXA PUNGVAXA QNTCVAXA RPHNVAXA SALDVAXA SBWKVAXA SMFDVAXA SRRYVAXA STCKVAXA STFRVAXA TPHNVAXA TRNGVAXA WKFDVAXA WNDSVAXA WRSWVAXA WYCVVAXA VERIZON VIRGINIA, INC. ALXNVAAD ALXNVAAX ALXNVABA ALXNVABR ALXNVACN ALXNVAFR ALXNVAMV ARTNVAAR ARTNVACK ARTNVACY ARTNVAFC ASBNVAAS ASLDVAAS BCHNVABH BCKNVABC BDFRVABD BEVLVABV BKBGVABB BLBGVABB BLMTVABM BOYCVABY BTHIVABT CALVVACA CGVLVACL CHCYVACC CHESVACR CHHMVACH CHSKVACD CHSKVADC CHSKVAGU CLHGVACO CLPPVACU CLPPVAGR CLPPVALI CLPPVARV CMLDVACU CNCRVACN CNVIVACT CRBGVACB CRVLVACV DAVLVADA DAVLVAFP DAVLVAWE DBLNVADU DNWDVADW DRVRVADR FIFEVAFI FLCHVAMF FRBGVAFB FRBGVALH FRFXVABF FRFXVAFF GCLDVAGO GNBOVAGA GNWDVAGW GOVLVAGV GRFLVAGF GVTNVAGR HLBOVAHB HMPNVAAB HMPNVADC HMPNVAQN HMPNVAWD HPWLVAHW HRNDVADU HRNDVAHE HRNDVAST HRWDVAHW LOUSVALU LRTNVAGU LSBGVALB LVTNVALN LVVLVALV LYBGVACH LYBGVACV LYBGVAMH LYBGVANL LYBGVAOF LYBGVATM LYBGVAYB MCHVVAMV MCKYVAMK MCLNVALV MDBGVAMI MDLTVAMD MDSNVAMA MNKNVAMN MNRLVAML MRSHVAMA NLFRVANF NRFLVABL NRFLVABS NRFLVAGS NRFLVAOV NRFLVASP NRFLVAWC NWNWVAHU NWNWVAHV NWNWVAJF NWNWVAND NWNWVAYK ORNGVAOR PCVLVAPV PLSKVAPU PNRVVAPR PRFRVAPF PTBGVACD PTBGVAPB PTMOVAHF PTMOVAHS PWHTVAPW QNTNVAQN RCMDVACG RCMDVAGK RCMDVAGR RCMDVAGY RCMDVAHL RCMDVAHR RCMDVAHS RCMDVAIT RCMDVALS RCMDVAPE RCMDVAPS RCMDVARA RCMDVASN RCMDVASR RCMDVATC RDFRVARA RKVLVARK RMTNVARE RONKVABK RONKVABS RONKVACS RONKVACV RONKVAGC RONKVALK RSTNVAFM SALMVAFL SALMVAMC SALMVASA SFFLVASK SHVLVASW SNMTVASM SNTNVASS SPFDVASP SPTSVASP STCYVASC STDRVASD STTNVAST STTNVAVE SWVLVASV THPLVATP TOANVATO UNVLVAUV UPVLVAUP VARNVAVR VINNVAVN VRBHVACC VRBHVACT VRBHVAGN VRBHVAIL VRBHVAIR VRBHVAPT VRBHVARC VRBHVASR VRBHVAVB WHOKVAWO WHVLVAWH WLBGVAWM WNCHVANM WNCHVAWC WNTRVAWG WRTNVAWR WSPNVAWP WTFRVAWT WVRLVAWV 23