*Pages 1--1 from Microsoft Word - 48418.doc* Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 1298 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 In the Matter of: CoxCom, Inc. d/ b/ a Cox Communications Gainesville/ Ocala Petition for Determination of Effective Competition in Gainesville, and Ocala, Florida, FL0150, and FL01671 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 6626- E, CSR 6627- E ORDER Adopted: May 5, 2005 Released: May 6, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau: 1. The Cities of Gainesville and Ocala, Florida (the “Cities”) filed a Motion for Extension of Time (“ Motion”) to file a response to the Petition for Special Relief (“ Petition”) in the above- captioned matter filed by CoxCom, Inc. d/ b/ a Cox Communications, on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates. The Cities state that because of scheduled meeting dates for the City Commission and City Counsel for both cities they will be unable to respond by the April 20, 2005, deadline. Furthermore, because of scheduling conflicts of legal counsel retained by the cities, counsel will not be available until after the second week in May. Therefore, the cities request an extension of time until May 24, 2005. The cities request is granted, the Cities response to CoxCom Communications Petition will be due on or before 24 May, 2005. CoxCom’s reply will be due 10 days thereafter. 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the Cities of Gainesville, and Ocala, Florida in the above- captioned proceeding IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. 3. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Section 0.283 of the Commission’s rules. 1 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Deputy Chief, Policy Division Media Bureau 1 47 C. F. R. § 0.283. 1