*Pages 1--2 from Microsoft Word - 49672.doc* Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 1780 1 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 In the Matter of Applications for Consent to the Assignment and/ or Transfer of Control of Licenses Adelphia Communications Corporation, (and subsidiaries, debtors- in- possession), Assignors, to Time Warner Cable Inc. (subsidiaries), Assignees; Adelphia Communications Corporation, (and subsidiaries, debtors- in- possession), Assignors and Transferors, to Comcast Corporation (subsidiaries), Assignees and Transferees; Comcast Corporation, Transferor, to Time Warner Inc., Transferee; Time Warner Inc., Transferor to Comcast Corporation, Transferee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MB Docket No. 05- 192 ORDER Adopted: June 24, 2005 Released: June 24, 2005 Comments and Petitions Due: July 21, 2005 Responses and Oppositions to Petitions Due: August 5, 2005 By the Acting Chief, Media Bureau: 1. On May 18, 2005, Adelphia Communications Corporation (‘ Adelphia”), Time Warner Inc. (“ Time Warner”) and Comcast Corporation (“ Comcast”) (collectively “Applicants”) submitted joint applications to the Commission seeking consent to transfer control of and/ or assign various Commission licenses and authorizations pursuant to Section 214 and Section 310( d) of the Communications Act of 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 1780 2 1934, as amended. 1 By Public Notice, released June 2, 2005, the Media Bureau set the dates for filing comments and petitions to deny as July 5, 2005, and set the date for filing responses to comments and oppositions to the petitions as July 20, 2005. 2 On June 21, 2005, Applicants filed supplemental information on the systems that will be transferred as a result of the transactions and on pre- and post-transaction subscriber counts. 2. On June 22, 2005, National Hispanic Media Coalition, Consumers Union, Consumer Federation of America and the Center for Digital Democracy (“ NHMC, et al.”) filed a Motion for Extension of Time (“ Motion”) requesting an extension until July 21, 2005, to file comments and petitions to deny in this proceeding. According to NHMC, et al., more time is needed due to the complexity of the transactions, and to permit NHMC, et al., and other interested parties, sufficient time to analyze the information entered in the record on June 21. Applicants do not oppose the request for an extension of time to file comments and petitions. 3. We find that there is good cause to extend the due dates for filing comments and petitions in this proceeding. Granting the extensions will serve the public interest in gathering a full record, and will permit interested parties more fully to analyze the supplementary information provided by the Applicants on June 21. We agree with NHMC, et al. that the information provided by Applicants on June 21 is sufficiently integral to their applications to warrant the extension of time to allow the public adequate time to analyze and to comment on the submissions. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4( i), 4( j) and 5( c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C. §§ 154( i), 154( j) and 155( c ), and Sections 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. §§ 0.61, 0.283, and 1.46, the date for filing comments and petitions to deny in MB Docket No. 05- 192 is extended until July 21, 2005, and the date for filing responses to comments and oppositions to petitions is extended to August 5, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donna C. Gregg Acting Chief, Media Bureau 1 See 47 U. S. C. §§ 214, 310( d). 2 Public Notice, DA 05- 1591, released June 2, 2005. 2