*Pages 1--2 from Microsoft Word - 51263.doc* Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 DA 05- 2378 August 30, 2005 Mr. Andrew R. D’Uva New Skies Networks, Inc. 2001 L Street N. W., Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 Re: Call Sign: E000152 File No.: SES- MOD- 20050816- 01107 Dear Mr. D’Uva: On August 16, 2005, New Skies Networks, Inc. (New Skies) filed the above- captioned application to modify an existing earth station license to add a 6.5 meter antenna that will use the conventional C- Band 1 to communicate with the INTELSAT AOR satellite at 307 o E. L. Pursuant to Section 25.112( a)( 1) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. §25.112( a)( 1), we dismiss this application as defective because of internal inconsistencies. Specifically, in Form 312 Schedule B, in Item E49, you indicate that the Maximum EIRP Density per Carrier is 42.7 dBW/ 4 kHz. This value is less than and therefore inconsistent with the average value of 60.93 dBW/ 4 kHz as derived from the values indicated in your application for Maximum EIRP per carrier of 78.0 dBW (Item E48) and 102 kHz bandwidth for the 102KG7W emission (Item E47). Given this inconsistency, we cannot determine the proposed emission power. 1 3700- 4200 and 5925- 6425 MHz bands. 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 2378 2 Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112( a)( 1) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. §25.112( a)( 1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission’s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C. F. R. §0.261, we dismiss your application without prejudice to refiling. 2 Sincerely, Scott A. Kotler Chief, Systems Analysis Branch Satellite Division International Bureau 2 If New Skies refiles an application identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of supplying the corrected information, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C. F. R. Section 1.1109( d). 2