*Pages 1--1 from Microsoft Word - 51766* Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 DA 05- 2487 September 21, 2005 Mr. Mike Meinhardt Meinhardt Productions, Inc. 793 Windemere Lane Lake Zurich, IL 60647 Re: Call Sign: E050247 File No.: SES- LIC- 20050822- 01121 Dear Mr. Meinhardt: On August 22, 2005, Meinhardt Productions, Inc. filed the above- captioned application for authority to operate a temporary- fixed earth station in the conventional Ku- Band 1 that would communicate with Permitted List satellites. Pursuant to Section 25.112( a)( 1) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. §25.112( a)( 1), we dismiss this application as defective because of internal inconsistencies. Specifically, in Form 312 Schedule B, you indicate that the Maximum EIRP Density per Carrier is 13.9 dBW/ 4 kHz for emission designators 9M00G7W, 6M70G7W, 1M70G7W, 72K0G7D, 2M40G7D, and 143KG7D. This value is less than and therefore inconsistent with the average values of 29.88, 31. 06, 31. 02, 31. 05, 31. 02, and 30.97dBW/ 4 kHz, respectively, as derived from the bandwidth of each emission and Maximum EIRP per carrier values of 63.4, 63.3, 57.3, 43.6, 58.8, and 46.5 dBW indicated in your application. Given these inconsistencies, we cannot determine the proposed emission power. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112( a)( 1) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. §25.112( a)( 1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission’s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C. F. R. §0.261, we dismiss your application without prejudice to refiling. 2 Sincerely, Scott A. Kotler Chief, Systems Analysis Branch Satellite Division International Bureau 1 11. 7- 12.2 and 14. 0- 14. 5 GHz bands. 2 If Meinhardt Productions, Inc. refiles an application identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of supplying the corrected information, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C. F. R. Section 1.1109( d). 1