*Pages 1--7 from Microsoft Word - 52283* Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 2685 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 In the Matter of CITY OF SUMMIT, NEW JERSEY Application and Request for Waiver to Permit Public Safety Use of Frequency Band 470- 480 MHz in Summit, New Jersey ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. 0001869696 ORDER Adopted: October 12, 2005 Released: October 13, 2005 By the Chief, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. We have before us an application and a waiver request 1 filed by the City of Summit, New Jersey, (“ Summit” or “the City”) for authority to operate a public safety radio system on eight UHF frequencies. 2 The frequencies are designated under Part 22 of the Commission’s Rules as paging control and trunked mobile channels in the New York City/ northern New Jersey area. Pursuant to Section 337( c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), 3 and Section 1.925 of the Commissions Rules, 4 Summit seeks a waiver of Sections 22.7, 22.501, 22.621, 22.651 and 90.311 of the Commission’s Rules 5 to permit public safety use of these currently unassigned frequencies. 6 For the reasons stated herein, we grant Summit’s waiver request. II. BACKGROUND 2. Summit, located in Union County, New Jersey, is a city of 21,000 residents. 7 Summit is a hub of rail and highway infrastructure through which thousands of commuters travel daily. 8 The growing 1 See FCC File No. 0001869696, City of Summit (filed Sept. 14, 2004) (Request), as amended on October 21, 2004 (October 21, 2004 Amendment) and October 26, 2004 (October 26, 2004 Amendment). The Request sought use of frequency pairs 476/ 479.0375, 476/ 479.1375, and 476/ 479.1875 MHz. The October 21, 2004 Amendment added frequency pair 476/ 479.2125 MHz. 2 Frequencies in the 300 MHz to 3 GHz range are Ultra High Frequencies (UHF), but land mobile frequencies in the 450- 512 MHz range are sometimes known as the land mobile “UHF band.” In this Order, references to UHF mean 450- 512 MHz. See, e. g., Implementation of Sections 309( j) and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934 as Amended, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, WT Docket No. 99- 87, 14 FCC Rcd 5206, 5215 ¶¶ 11- 12 (1999). 3 47 U. S. C. § 337( c). 4 47 C. F. R. § 1.925. 5 47 C. F. R. §§ 22.7, 22.501, 22.621, 22.651, 90.311. See Request at 3. 6 See Request at 1. 7 Id. at 2- 3. 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 2685 2 number of residents and commuters impose increasing responsibilities on Summit’s law enforcement, fire, and emergency services. 9 Summit states that its existing, outdated communications system on Stations KCZ906, Summit, New Jersey, and WIK881, Summit, New Jersey, is inadequate to meet these demands. 10 3. Summit asserts that access to the requested Part 22 frequencies is critical to expand the coverage and transmission quality of its public safety communications, which are presently confined to a limited number of frequencies in different bands. 11 A new system will facilitate interoperability between Summit’s first responders, such as the City’s Police, Fire, and Emergency Medical Service, and its other public service providers, as well as interoperability with over forty surrounding communities, in addition to State and county agencies. 12 Summit proposes to combine the UHF frequency pair already licensed to Station WIK881 with the four frequency pairs sought in the current application to construct and implement a five- pair trunked radio system. 13 Summit states that the new system will speed emergency response and improve the delivery of all public services. 14 Because the requested frequencies are not designated for public safety use, Summit requires a waiver of Sections 22.7, 22.501, 22.621, 22.651, 90.303, and 90.311 of the Commission’s Rules. 15 Summit also states that if it obtains the requested UHF frequency pairs, it will relinquish frequency pair 154.1750/ 154.3550 MHz to the extent it is not required for interoperability with other entities. 16 4. On November 17, 2004, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau’s Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division (Division) sought comment on Summit’s application and waiver request. 17 The Division received comments from the County of Westchester, New York (Westchester), 18 which (Continued from previous page) 8 Id. at 3. 9 Id. at 4. 10 Id. 11 Id. at 2. Specifically, Station KCZ906 is authorized to use two frequencies in the 150- 174 MHz band and one UHF frequency, and Station WIK881 is authorized to use one UHF frequency pair. 12 Id. at 2- 3. 13 Id. at 3. 14 Id. 15 47 C. F. R. §§ 22.7, 22.501, 22.621, 22.651, 90.303, 90.311. Section 22.7 limits eligibility to operate on Part 22 frequencies to common (i. e., commercial) carriers. Section 22.501 defines the scope of the licensing and operation of the public paging and radiotelephone service. Section 22.621 requires the use of point- to- multipoint operation on four of the requested frequencies. Section 22.651 requires the use of trunked mobile operations on the other four frequencies requested. But see 47 C. F. R. § 22.655 (the FCC is redesignating public mobile channels in the 470- 512 MHz range from trunked mobile operation to point- to- multipoint operation as the demand for trunked mobile service decreases). Section 90.303 provides frequencies available for assignment to land mobile systems, and references Section 90.311, which excludes frequencies in the 470- 512 MHz range from assignment to private land mobile radio applicants if the frequencies are allocated for services under Part 22. 16 Request at 11 n. 1. Frequency pair 154.1750/ 154.3550 MHz is on Summit’s license for Station KCZ906. 17 See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Request for Waiver by the City of Summit, New Jersey to Operate a County- Wide Public Safety Radio System Utilizing Eight Part 22 UHF Trunked Mobile Frequencies, Public Notice, 19 FCC Rcd 22585 (WTB PSCID 2004). Comments were due on December 2, 2004, and reply comments were due on December 13, 2004. 18 See Comments of the County of Westchester, New York (filed Dec. 2, 2004) (Westchester Comments). Summit filed reply comments. See Reply Comments of the Summit Police Department (filed Dec. 13, 2004). 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 2685 5 harmful interference to other spectrum users entitled to protection from interference. 31 In addition, Summit’s Commission- certified frequency coordinator concludes that the proposed radio system will not interfere with other licensed and proposed public safety systems. 32 Summit also meets the spacing requirements for co- channel and adjacent channel TV stations. 33 We believe Summit has shown that the operational and technical parameters of its proposed system meet the Commission’s requirements for interference protection to incumbent public safety licensees. Moreover, we note that the potential for interference to adjacent channel users is further diminished because Summit will use 12.5 kHz bandwidth equipment on frequencies designated under Part 22 for 20 kHz bandwidth. 34 There will no spectrum overlap with adjacent channel users 35 because they utilize 12.5 kHz bandwidth channels and are spaced 12.5 kHz from various channels sought by Summit. We therefore agree that Summit’s proposed system is technically feasible and will not cause harmful interference to other users. 9. Public safety use of the frequencies is consistent with other public safety spectrum allocations in the geographic area. As Summit notes, the frequencies it proposes to use in its public safety communications system are within a frequency band where public safety land mobile radio operations are authorized, and are currently being used by other public safety agencies in the New York City metropolitan area (e. g., the Union County Prosecutor and County Police, and the New York City, Nassau County, and Bergen County Police Departments). 36 We therefore find that the use of the unassigned frequency pairs for the provision of the proposed public safety services is consistent with other allocations for the provision of such services in the geographic area specified in the application. Moreover, because other agencies in the New York City metropolitan area are using these frequencies, we believe that granting the request may promote interoperability among public safety community in this area. 10. The frequencies have been allocated for non- public safety use for more than two years. The Commission allocated these frequencies for non- public safety use in 1994. 37 Thus, these frequencies have been allocated for their present use for more than two years. 11. Granting this application is consistent with the public interest. We believe Summit’s filings demonstrate that access to additional spectrum is needed in order to promote effective public safety communications. As described by Summit, granting the applications and waiver request would be in the public interest as it will cure deficiencies in the existing public safety radio systems and provide interoperability among Summit’s fire, police, EMS, and other departments. 38 The proposed system 31 See FCC File No. 0001869696, Analysis of the Potential for Co- Channel Interference Between Summit, NJ and Westchester County, NY, prepared by the Vogel Consulting Group, Inc., dated October, 2004; Vogel Letter. Signal strength studies were conducted to show that no interference is anticipated between Summit and co- channel licensee Syosset, New York Fire District. The letter also states that adjacent channel licensees Jersey City, the Borough of Fort Lee, and the City of Bayonne, New Jersey will be afforded adequate protection. Vogel Letter at 1- 2. 32 See Letter dated Oct. 18, 2004 from Lieutenant Anthony Melia, APCO New Jersey Frequency Advisor, to Michael Wilhelm, Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless [sic] Division, Federal Communications Commission. 33 Request at 6- 7; see also Vogel Letter at 2. 34 Request at 2; see 47 C. F. R. §§ 22.621, 22.651. 35 See adjacent channel licensees identified in n. 31. 36 Request at 8. 37 See Revision of Part 22 of the Commission’s Rules Governing the Public Mobile Services, Report and Order, CC Docket 92- 115, 9 FCC Rcd 6513 (1994). 38 Request at 9. 5 Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 2685 6 should assist the State of New Jersey’s initiative to increase domestic preparedness through pervasive interoperability. 39 We believe that it would further the public interest by affording Summit’s public safety community the necessary spectrum to allow it to protect the lives and property in its care. Indeed, Section 1 of the Act defines one of the Commission’s over- arching purposes as “promoting safety of life and property through the use of … radio communication.” 40 We also find that Summit’s commitment to relinquish frequency pair 154.1750/ 154.3550 MHz serves the public interest by easing the congestion on these shared channels in the New York City metropolitan area. Additionally, we find it significant that granting the instant request may promote interoperability capability among the public safety community in the New York City metropolitan area. IV. CONCLUSION 12. We conclude that Summit’s waiver request satisfies the criteria set forth under Section 337( c) of the Act to obtain a grant of its application to operate a public safety communications system on frequencies in the 470- 480 MHz band. 41 We therefore grant Summit’s request. 42 V. ORDERING CLAUSES 13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4( i) and 337( c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C. § 154( i), 337( c), the request for waiver associated with the captioned application filed by the City of Summit, New Jersey on September 14, 2004, as amended, to use frequencies 476/ 479.0375, 476/ 479.1375, 476/ 479.1875 MHz, and 476/ 479.2125 MHz for public safety services as requested in the captioned application IS GRANTED. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4( i) and 337( c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C. § 154( i), 337( c), that File No. 0001869696 SHALL BE PROCESSED consistent with this Order and the Commission’s Rules. 39 Id.; see, e. g., Attorney General’s Office of the State of New Jersey, Order, DA 05- 1609, ¶ 3 (WTB PSCID rel. June 7, 2005). 40 47 U. S. C. § 151. 41 In view of the conclusion that a waiver grant for Summit is warranted under Section 337( c) of the Act, we need not reach the question of whether the Summit’s waiver request should be granted under Section 1.925( b)( 3) of the Commission’s Rules. 42 We note, however, that Summit’s current licenses authorize only conventional operations. Before Summit may trunk its currently authorized channels with its new channels, it must request and obtain authorization to do so. See 47 C. F. R. § 90.187. 6 Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 2685 7 15. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 C. F. R. §§ 0131, 0331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michael J. Wilhelm Chief, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 7