*Pages 1--1 from  C:\Pdf2Text\Ready4Text_in\pdf\46619.pdf*
 Federal  Communications  Commission  Washington,  5C  20554 
 International  Bureau 
 DA  05-  531 
 March  2,  2005 
 Todd  M.  Stansbury,  Esq.  Counsel  for  Spectrum  Five  LLC 
 Wiley  Rein  &  Fielding  LLP  1776  K  Street,  NW 
 Washington,  D.  C.  20006 
 Re:  Spectrum  Five  LLC  Petition  for  Declaratory  Ruling,  File  No.  SAT-  LOI-  20041228-  00229,  Call  Sign  S2650 


 Dear  Mr.  Stansbury: 
 On  February  17,2005,  the  Satellite  Division  dismissed  without  prejudice  Application  File  No.  SAT-  LOI-  20041228-  00228  (Call  Sign  2649).  See  Letter  from  Fern 
 J.  Jarmulnek  to  Todd  M.  Stansbury  (Feb.  l7,2005)(  DA  05-  354).  In  the  dismissal  letter,  the  Division  found  that  Spectrum  Five  LLC's  petitions  to  serve  the  United  States  from 
 two  Spectrum  Five  satellites  were  defective.  The  Division,  however,  erroneously  cited  only  one  of  the  two  petitions  filed  by  Spectrum  Five.  For  the  same  reasons  addressed  in 
 the  February  17,  2005  dismissal  letter,  we  dismiss  without  prejudice  to  refiling  Spectrum  Five's  petition  for  its  second  satellite,  File  No.  SAT-  LOI-  20041228-  00229,  Call  Sign 
 S2650. 


 Sincerely  , 


 Fern  J.  Jarmuhek  Deputy  Chief,  Satellite  Division 
 cc:  David  Wilson  President 
 SPECTRUM  FIVE  LLC  626  S.  25th  Street 
 Arlington,  VA  22202 
1