*Pages 1--4 from Microsoft Word - 47124.doc* Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 711 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73. 202( b), Table of Allotments, FM Broadcast Stations. (Ely and Spring Creek, Nevada) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MB Docket No. 05- 113 RM- 11195 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING Adopted: March 16, 2005 Released: March 18, 2005 Comment Date: May 9, 2005 Reply Comment Date: May 24, 2005 By the Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: 1. The Audio Division has before it a petition for rule making in which Ruby Radio Corporation, licensee of Station KCLS( FM), Ely, Nevada (“ Petitioner”), proposes the substitution of Channel 269C1 for Channel 269C3 at Ely, the reallotment of Channel 269C1 from Ely to Spring Creek, Nevada, as the community’s first local transmission service, and the modification of the license for Station KCLS( FM) to reflect the new community. Petitioner pledges to file an application for the channel and to construct the facilities if the application is granted. 2. Petitioner filed this proposal for reallotment in accordance with the provisions of Section 1.420( i) of the Commission’s Rules, which permits the modification of a station’s license to specify a new community of license while not affording other interested parties the opportunity to file competing expressions of interest in the proposed allotment. 1 In considering a reallotment proposal, we compare the existing allotment to the proposed allotment to determine whether the reallotment will result in a preferential arrangement of allotments. This determination is based upon the FM Allotment priorities. 2 3. In support of the petition, Petitioner states that its proposal will serve the public interest, it would result in a preferential arrangement of allotments, and meets the requirements for reallotment set forth in Change of Community R& O. First, the allotment of Channel 269C1 at Spring Creek is mutually exclusive with the current use of Channel 269C3 at Ely. Second, the community of Ely, 2000 U. S. Census population 4,041 persons, would not be deprived of its sole local service. 3 Third, the proposal would provide a first local aural transmission service at Spring Creek under Priority (3), which will result in a preferential arrangement of allotments over the retention of a third local transmission service at Ely, which would serve Priority (4). We seek comment on the public interest benefits of the change of community. 1 See Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Regarding Modification of FM and TV Authorizations to Specify a New Community of License (“ Change of Community R& O”), 4 FCC Rcd 4870 (1989), recon. granted in part, 5 FCC Rcd 7094 (1990). 2 See Revision of FM Assignment Policies and Procedures, 90 FCC2d 88, 91 (1988). The FM Allotment priorities are (1) First full- time aural service. (2) Second full- time aural service. (3) First local service. (4) Other public interest matters. [Co- equal weight is given to given to priorities (2) and (3)]. 3 Stations KDSS( FM) and KELY( AM) will remain in Ely. 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 711 2 4. In further support of the reallotment, Petitioner claims that Spring Creek is a community for allotment purposes, that it is not in any urbanized area, that its proposed 70dBu will cover less than 50 percent of any urbanized area, and thus no Tuck 4 analysis is required. Further, Petitioner states that its proposal will create a net gain in service to over 27,000 persons within an area of 11,619 square kilometers. Our engineering analysis agrees with this submission. 5. In support of its community status, Petitioner states that Spring Creek is a Census Designated Place and has its own post office and zip code. It has a 2000 U. S. Census population of 10,548 persons. The community has its own schools, water and sewer systems, churches, golf course, shooting range, and businesses. We find that Spring Creek is a community for allotment purposes. 6. We believe that the proposal warrants consideration because it could provide Spring Creek with a first local aural transmission service without depriving Ely of its sole local transmission service. Channel 269C1 has been proposed to be reallotted at Spring Creek at a site 31.1 kilometers (19.3 miles) northwest of the community. 5 7. Accordingly, we seek comment on the proposed amendment of the FM Table of Allotments, Section 73.202( b) of the Commission’s Rules, for the communities listed below, to read as follows: Channel Community Present Proposed Ely, Nevada 224C2, 269C3 224C2 Spring Creek, Nevada ----- 269C1 8. The Commission’s authority to institute rule making proceedings, showings required, cut- off procedures, and filing requirements are contained in the attached Appendix and are incorporated by reference herein. In particular, we note that a showing of continuing interest is required by paragraph 2 of the Appendix before a channel will be allotted. 9. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission’s Rules, interested parties may file comments or counterproposals on or before May 9, 2005, and reply comments on or before May 24, 2005, and are advised to read the Appendix for the proper procedures. Comments should be filed with the Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, 445 Twelfth Street, SW, TW- A325, Washington, D. C. 20554. Additionally, a copy of such comments should be served on Petitioner’s counsel, as follows: David Tillotson, Esq. Law Office of David Tillotson 4606 Charleston Terrace, N. W. Washington, DC 20007- 1911 10. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first- class or overnight U. S. Postal Service mail (although we continue to experience delays in receiving U. S. Postal Service mail). The Commission’s contractor, Natek, Inc., will receive hand- delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission’s Secretary at 236 Massachusetts Avenue, N. E., Suite 110, 4 Faye and Richard Tuck, 3 FCC Rcd 5374 (1988). 5 The coordinates for Channel 269C1 at Spring Creek are 40- 5- 18 NL and 115- 50- 58 WL. 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 711 3 Washington, D. C. 20002. The filing hours at this location are 8: 00 a. m. to 7: 00 p. m. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. Commercial overnight mail (other than U. S. Postal Service Express Mail or Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U. S. Postal Service first- class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12 th Street, SW, Washington, D. C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary. Any filing that is not addressed to the Office of the Secretary will be treated as filed on the day it is received in the Office of the Secretary. See 47 C. F. R. § 1.7. Accordingly, failure to follow the specified requirements may result in the treatment of a filing as untimely. 11. The Commission has determined that the relevant provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to a rule making proceeding to amend the FM Table of Allotments, Section 73.202( b) of the Commission's Rules. 6 This document does not contain proposed information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104- 13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information collection burden “for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,” pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107- 198, see 44 U. S. C. 3506( c)( 4). 12. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Victoria M. McCauley (202) 418- 2180. For purposes of this restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding, members of the public are advised that no ex parte presentations are permitted from the time the Commission adopts a Notice of Proposed Rule Making until the proceeding has been decided and such decision is no longer subject to reconsideration by the Commission or review by any court. An ex parte presentation is not prohibited if specifically requested by the Commission or staff for the clarification or adduction of evidence or resolution of issues in the proceeding. However, any new written information elicited from such a request or a summary of any new oral information shall be served by the person making the presentation upon the other parties to the proceeding unless the Commission specifically waives this service requirement. Any comment which has not been served on the petitioners constitutes an ex parte presentation and shall not be considered in the proceeding. Any reply comment which has not been served on the person( s) who filed the comment, to which the reply is directed, constitutes an ex parte presentation and shall not be considered in the proceeding. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John A. Karousos Assistant Chief Audio Division Media Bureau Attachment: Appendix 6 See Certification that Section 603 and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act Do Not Apply to Rule Makings to Amend Sections 73. 202( b), 73.504 and 73. 606( b) of the Commission's Rules. 46 FR 11549 (February 9, 1981). 3 Federal Communications Commission DA 05- 711 4 APPENDIX 1. Pursuant to authority found in Sections 4( i), 5( c)( 1), 303( g) and (r), and 307( b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.61, 0.204( b) and 0. 283 of the Commission's Rules, IT IS PROPOSED TO AMEND the FM Table of Allotments, Section 73.202( b) of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, as set forth in the Notice of Proposed Rule Making to which this Appendix is attached. 2. Showings Required. Comments are invited on the proposal( s) discussed in the Notice of Proposed Rule Making to which this Appendix is attached. Proponent( s) will be expected to answer whatever questions are presented in initial comments. The proponent of a proposed allotment is also expected to file comments even if it only resubmits or incorporates by reference its former pleadings. It should also restate its present intention to apply for the channel if it is allotted and, if authorized, to build a station promptly. Failure to file may lead to denial of the request. 3. Cut- off protection. The following procedures will govern the consideration of filings in this proceeding. (a) Counterproposals advanced in this proceeding itself will be considered, if advanced in initial comments, so that parties may comment on them in reply comments. They will not be considered if advanced in reply comments. (See Section 1.420( d) of the Commission's Rules). (b) With respect to petitions for rule making which conflict with the proposals in this Notice, they will be considered as comments in the proceeding, and Public Notice to this effect will be given as long as they are filed before the date for filing initial comments herein. If they are filed later than that, they will not be considered in connection with the decision in this docket. (c) The filing of a counterproposal may lead the Commission to allot a different channel than was requested for any of the communities involved. 4. Comments and Reply Comments; Service. Pursuant to applicable procedures set out in Sections 1.415 and 1.420 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates set forth in the Notice of Proposed Rule Making to which this Appendix is attached. All submissions by parties to this proceeding or by persons acting on behalf of such parties must be made in written comments, reply comments, or other appropriate pleadings. The person filing the comments shall serve comments on the petitioners. Reply comments shall be served on the person( s) who filed comments to which the reply is directed. A certificate of service shall accompany such comments and reply comments. (See Section 1.420( a), (b) and (c) of the Commission's Rules.) Comments should be filed with the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D. C. 20554. 5. Number of Copies. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1.420 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations, an original and four copies of all comments, reply comments, pleadings, briefs, or other documents shall be furnished the Commission. 6. Public Inspection of Filings. All filings made in this proceeding will be available for examination by interested parties during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, at its headquarters, 445 12th Street, S. W., Washington, D. C. 4