*Pages 1--16 from Microsoft Word - 59621.doc* Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Requests for Review and Waiver ) of the Decision of the ) Universal Service Administrator by ) ) Alaska Gateway School District ) File Nos. SLD- 412028, et al. Tok, AK, et al. ) ) Schools and Libraries Universal Service ) CC Docket No. 02- 6 Support Mechanism ) ORDER Adopted: September 14, 2006 Released: September 14, 2006 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Order, we grant 128 appeals of decisions by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) reducing or denying funding from the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism (also known as the E- rate program) on the grounds that they failed to timely submit an FCC Form 486. 1 As explained below, in each case we find that good cause exists to waive USAC’s deadline for the FCC Form 486 filed with USAC and we remand the underlying applications associated with these appeals to USAC for further action consistent with this Order. To ensure that the underlying applications are resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of each application listed in the Appendix and issue an award or denial based upon a complete review and analysis no later than 90 days from the release of this Order. In addition, we direct USAC to develop targeted outreach procedures designed to better inform applicants of approaching FCC Form 486 filing deadlines and to provide applicants with a 15- day opportunity to file or amend the form. 2. As we recently noted, applicants seeking funding from the E- rate program contend that the application process is complicated and time- consuming. 2 As a result, a significant number of 1 In this Order, we use the term “appeals” to generically refer to requests for review of decisions, or to waivers related to such decisions, issued by the Commission, the Wireline Competition Bureau, or USAC. A list of these petitions is attached in the Appendix and we will refer to all of these parties as Petitioners. Section 54. 719( c) of the Commission’s rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may seek review from the Commission. 47 C. F. R. § 54. 719( c). 2 Comprehensive Review of Universal Service Fund Management, Administration, and Oversight, Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service, Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, Rural Health Care Support Mechanism, Lifeline and Linkup, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., WC Docket Nos. 05- 195, 02- 60, 03- 109, CC Docket Nos. 96- 45, 02- 6, 97- 21, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 20 FCC Rcd 11308 (2005) (Comprehensive Review NPRM). 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 2 applications for E- rate support are denied because of applicant ministerial or clerical errors. We find that the actions we take here to provide relief will promote the statutory requirements of section 254( h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”), by helping to ensure that eligible schools and libraries obtain access to discounted telecommunications and information services. 3 In particular, we believe that by directing USAC to enhance certain application outreach procedures and granting this limited waiver of the deadline, we will provide for a more effective application processing system that ensures eligible schools and libraries will be able to realize the intended benefits of the program as we consider additional steps to reform and improve the E- rate program. 4 Requiring USAC to take these additional steps will not reduce or eliminate any application review procedures or program requirements that applicants must comply with to receive funding. Indeed, we retain our commitment to detecting and deterring potential instances of waste, fraud, and abuse by ensuring that USAC continues to scrutinize applications and takes steps to educate applicants in a manner that fosters program participation. We also emphasize that our actions taken in this Order should have minimal impact on the Universal Service Fund (USF or Fund) because the monies needed to fund these appeals have already been collected and held in reserve. 5 II. BACKGROUND 3. Under the E- rate program, eligible schools, libraries, and consortia that include eligible schools and libraries may apply for discounts for eligible telecommunications services, Internet access, and internal connections. 6 After an applicant for discounted services under the E- rate program has entered into agreements for eligible services with one or more service providers, it must file an FCC Form 471 with USAC. 7 The FCC Form 471 notifies USAC of the services that have been ordered and supplies an estimate of funds requested for eligible services. 8 USAC then issues a funding commitment decision letter indicating the funding, if any, for which the applicant is approved to receive. After the funding year begins and the applicant begins receiving services at the discounted rate, the applicant submits an FCC Form 486 to USAC. The FCC Form 486 indicates that the service has begun, specifies the service start date and demonstrates that the applicant has received approval of its technology plans. 9 The timely 3 47 U. S. C. § 254( h). The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 104, 110 Stat. 56, amended the Communications Act of 1934. 4 Comprehensive Review NPRM, 20 FCC Rcd at 11324- 25, paras. 37- 40 (seeking comment on the application process and competitive bidding requirements for the schools and libraries program). 5 We estimate that the appeals granted in this Order involve applications for approximately $11. 3 million in funding for Funding Years 2000- 2005. We note that USAC has already reserved sufficient funds to address outstanding appeals. See, e. g., Universal Service Administrative Company, Federal Universal Service Support Mechanisms Fund Size Projections for the Third Quarter 2006, dated May 2, 2006. 6 See 47 C. F. R. §§ 54. 501- 54.503. 7 See Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Services Ordered and Certification Form, OMB 3060- 0806 (December 1997) (Funding Year 1999 FCC Form 471); Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Services Ordered and Certification Form, OMB 3060- 0806 (September 1999) (Funding Year 2000 FCC Form 471); Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Services Ordered and Certification Form, OMB 3060- 0806 (October 2000) (Funding Year 2001 FCC Form 471); Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Services Ordered and Certification Form, OMB 3060- 0806 (November 2001) (Funding Year 2002 FCC Form 471); Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Services Ordered and Certification Form, OMB 3060- 0806 (October 2003) (Funding Year 2004 FCC Form 471); Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Services Ordered and Certification Form, OMB 3060- 0806 (November 2004) (Funding Year 2005 FCC Form 471) (collectively, FCC Form 471). 8 47 C. F. R. § 54. 504( c). 9 Instructions for Completing the Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Receipt of Service Confirmation Form (FCC Form 486), OMB 3060- 0853 (April 2000) (2000 FCC Form 486 Instructions); Instructions for Completing the 2 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 3 submission of FCC Form 486 ensures that disbursements for discounts on eligible services are done in a prompt and efficient manner. Because the FCC Form 486 indicates the actual service start date, USAC will only issue disbursements to the service provider for discounts on eligible services after receipt of the form. 10 4. The deadline for receipt of the FCC Form 486, which is established by USAC, has varied over the years. In Funding Year 2000, applicants with recurring services were required to submit the FCC Form 486 postmarked by December 14, 2001. 11 In Funding Year 2001, the FCC Form 486 was due October 28, 2001, unless the service start date began or a funding commitment decision letter was issued after October 28, 2001. 12 In that case, the FCC Form 486 was required to be postmarked no later than 120 days after the service start date or the date of the funding commitment decision letter, whichever was later, for applicants to receive discounts retroactively to the service start date. 13 If an applicant failed to meet this requirement, USAC adjusted the start date for discounted services to either the date that the FCC Form 486 was postmarked or, in cases where the funding commitment decision letter came after the October 28, 2001 deadline, to 120 days before the date that the FCC Form 486 was postmarked. 14 In Funding Year 2002 and subsequent funding years, the FCC Form 486 had to be postmarked no later than 120 days after the date service began or no later than 120 days after the date of the funding commitment decision letter, whichever was later, to receive discounts retroactively to the service start date. 15 For a late FCC Form 486, the start date for discounted services is reset to 120 days before the postmark date. 16 No Schools and Libraries Universal Service Receipt of Service Confirmation Form, OMB 3060- 0853 (July 2001) (2001 FCC Form 486 Instructions); Instructions for Completing the Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Receipt of Service Confirmation Form (FCC Form 486), OMB 3060- 0853 (September 2002) (2002 FCC Form 486 Instructions); Instructions for Completing the Schools and Libraries Universal Service, Receipt of Service Confirmation Form (FCC Form 486), OMB 3060- 0853 (August 2003) at 2 (2003 FCC Form 486 Instructions) (collectively, FCC Form 486 Instructions). 10 See, e. g., 2003 Form 486 Instructions at 2. See also Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service, Children’s Internet Protection Act, CC Docket No. 96- 45, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 12443, 12444, para. 4 (2002) (CIPA II Order); 47 C. F. R. § 54. 520. 11 See November 2001 Announcements, Funding Year 3 Disbursement Closeout Process, available at http:// www. sl. universalservice. org/ whatsnew/ 2001/ 112001. asp. 12 Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service, Children’s Internet Protection Act, CC Docket No. 96- 45, Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 8182, 8188- 89, 8191, paras. 10, 18 (2001) (CIPA Order); 47 C. F. R. § 54. 520( g)( 1) (2001); 2001 Form 486 Instructions. Under the Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) and the Neighborhood Children’s Internet Protection Act (NCIPA), Congress imposed new conditions on schools with Internet access that request discounted services under the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism. 47 U. S. C. § 254( h)( 5), 254( l). Schools seeking costs for Internet access or internal connections services must certify to these conditions on the FCC Form 486. For Funding Year 2001, Congress established a deadline of October 28, 2001, unless services began after that date or the funding commitment decision letter was sent after that date. 47 U. S. C. §§ 254( h)( 5)( E), 254( h)( 6)( E); CIPA Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 8188- 89, 8191, paras. 10, 18. Because the October 28, 2001 deadline for that funding year is a statutory requirement, it cannot be waived. 13 2001 Form 486 Instructions at 8- 10. 14 Form 2001 486 Instructions at 9- 10. See, e. g., Request for Review by East Carroll Parish School Board, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD- 232946, CC Docket Nos. 96- 45 and 97- 21, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 24591, 24594, para. 7 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2002) (providing funding only for services provided on or after the FCC Form 486 filing date of October 30, 2001, instead of the funding year start date of July 1, 2001). 15 CIPA II Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 12445, para. 5; 2003 Form 486 Instructions at 6. 16 Id. 3 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 4 funding is provided for services rendered prior to the new start date and funding commitments are reduced for the relevant funding request. 17 5. One hundred and twenty- eight Petitioners have requested a waiver of the deadlines or a review of USAC’s decision to deny or reduce funding because of the Petitioners’ late filings. The Commission may waive any provision of its rules on its own motion and for good cause shown. 18 A rule may be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. 19 In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis. 20 In sum, waiver is appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. 21 III. DISCUSSION 6. In this item, we grant 128 appeals of decisions reducing or denying requests for funding from the E- rate program and remand the underlying applications associated with these appeals to USAC for further action consistent with this Order. 22 Petitioners’ requests for funding were denied or reduced because USAC found that the FCC Form 486 was filed late or the form may not have been filed. 23 These Petitioners, however, either claim that the filings were on time, 24 that the late filings were the result of immaterial clerical, ministerial or procedural errors, 25 or that the late filings were due to circumstances beyond their control. 26 7. Based on the facts and the circumstances of these specific cases, we find that good cause exists to waive the deadline for filing the FCC Form 486 for Petitioners. 27 Under Bureau precedent, 17 Id. 18 47 C. F. R. §1. 3. 19 Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F. 2d 1164, 1166 (D. C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). 20 WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F. 2d 1153, 1157, (D. C. Cir. 1969), affirmed by WAIT Radio v. FCC, 459 F. 2d 1203 (D. C. Cir. 1972). 21 Northeast Cellular, 897 F. 2d at 1166. 22 Eldora Public Library (Eldora) framed its request for review as an appeal of USAC’s denial of its request for an extension of the invoice deadline (FCC Form 472). Our review of the record indicates that Eldora did not file its FCC Form 486. Eldora claims that it inadvertently failed to comply with program rules because of Eldora’s small staff and the complexity of the E- rate program. On our own motion, we grant a waiver of Eldora’s FCC Form 486 deadline. 23 See Appendix. 24 See, e. g., Request for Review by Fair Haven School District; Request for Review by Oldham County Public Library; Request for Review by Schuylkill Intermediate Unit No. 29; Request for Review by Bordentown Regional School District; Request for Review by Diocese of Gallup Catholic Schools. 25 See, e. g., Request for Review by Quartzsite Elementary School District No. 4; Request for Review by Fort Plain Central School District; Request for Review by Good Shepard Center; Request for Review by Pueblo 60 School District; Request for Review by Lifeline Center for Child Development. 26 See, e. g., Request for Review by Yukon Flats School District; Request for Review by School District U 46; Request for Review by North Wasco County School District No. 21; Request for Waiver by Bay County School District; Request for Review by Western Christian High School. 27 Because we waive the FCC Form 486 deadline, applicants should receive funding from their actual service start date. We also direct USAC to waive any of its subsequent deadlines if related to the late- filed FCC Form 486, such as the FCC Form 472 deadline, if necessary for the processing of Petitioners’ applications. 4 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 5 deadlines have been strictly enforced for the E- rate program, including those pertaining to the FCC Form 486. 28 As we recently noted in Bishop Perry Middle School, a departure from required filing deadlines may be warranted upon careful review of the Petitioner’s case and when doing so will serve the public interest. 29 Generally, these applicants claim that staff mistakes or confusion, or circumstances beyond their control resulted in missing the FCC Form 486 deadline. 30 We note that the primary jobs of most of the people filling out these forms include school administrators, technology coordinators and teachers, as opposed to staff dedicated to pursuing federal grants, especially in small school districts. Even when a school official becomes adept at the application process, unforeseen events or emergencies may delay filings in the event there is no other person proficient enough to complete the forms. 31 Furthermore, some of the errors were caused by third parties or unforeseen events and therefore were not the fault of the applicants. Given that the applicants missed a USAC procedural deadline and did not violate a Commission rule, we find that the complete rejection of each of these applications is not warranted. Notably, at this time, there is no evidence of waste, fraud or abuse, misuse of funds, or a failure to adhere to core program requirements. Furthermore, we find that denial of funding in these cases would inflict undue hardship on the applicants. In these cases, the applicants have demonstrated that rigid compliance with USAC’s application procedures does not further the purposes of section 254( h) or serve the public interest. 32 We therefore grant these appeals and remand them to USAC for further processing consistent with this Order. 8. We emphasize the limited nature of this decision. Because the FCC Form 486 contains the Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) certification, all applicants must file the form with USAC. 33 While we have waived the deadline for filing, we do not waive the requirement of the filing itself. Furthermore, we recognize that filing deadlines are necessary for the efficient administration of the schools and libraries E- rate program. Although we grant the subject appeals before us, our action here does not eliminate USAC’s deadline for filing the FCC Form 486. We continue to require E- rate applicants to submit complete and accurate information to USAC as part of the application review process. However, as of the effective date of this Order, we require USAC to develop additional outreach and educational efforts to inform applicants of the application requirements in an attempt to reduce these types of filing errors. Specifically, USAC shall develop a targeted outreach program designed to identify schools and libraries that have not filed their FCC Form 486 120 days from the date of their funding commitment decision letter or service start date, whichever is later. 34 The purpose of this outreach effort 28 See Requests for Waiver by Lucia Mar Unified School District, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD- 249712, et al., CC Docket No. 02- 6, Order, 19 FCC Rcd. 20364, para. 3 (Wireline Competition Bur. Rel. May 28, 2004); Request for Review by East Carroll Parish School Board, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. SLD- 232946, CC Docket Nos. 96- 45 and 97- 21, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 24591, 24594, para. 7 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2002). 29 Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Bishop Perry Middle School, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD- 487170, et al., CC Docket No. 02- 6, Order, 21 FCC Rcd 5316, para. 9 (rel. May 19, 2006) (Bishop Perry Middle School). 30 Some Petitioners claim that they postmarked the FCC Form 486 on time. Given that we are waiving USAC’s deadline for these applicants who mistakenly or knowingly filed late, we give these Petitioners the benefit of the doubt and, to the extent necessary, waive the FCC Form 486 filing deadline for them as well. 31 For example, Western Christian High School’s sole Universal Service Fund official suffered a debilitating stroke and was unable to meet the Form 486 deadline. Request for Review by Western Christian High School at 1. 32 See 47 U. S. C. § 254( h). 33 Those applicants that filed their FCC Form 486 with their appeal to the Commission must also file the form with USAC, if they have not already done so. 34 The service start date can be determined from Block 5 of the applicant’s FCC Form 471. 5 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 6 will be to provide the applicant with an additional opportunity to file or amend its FCC Form 486. When an applicant has missed the deadline to file its FCC Form 486, applicants will have 15 calendar days from the date of receipt of notice in writing by USAC to file or amend its FCC Form 486. 35 Again, this direction will not limit or preclude any application review procedures of USAC; instead, this 15- day period will provide E- rate applicants with a limited additional opportunity to file or amend its FCC Form 486. The 15- day period is limited enough to ensure that funding decisions are not unreasonably delayed for E- rate applicants and should be sufficient time to correct truly unintentional ministerial and clerical errors. 36 The opportunity for applicants to file or amend their filings to cure minor errors will also improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Fund. Because applicants who are eligible for funding will now receive funding where previously it was denied for minor errors, we will ensure that funding is distributed first to the applicants who are determined by our rules to be most in need of funding. As a result, universal service support will be received by schools in which it will have the greatest impact for the most students. Furthermore, the opportunity to file or amend the application will improve the efficiency of the schools and libraries program. If USAC helps applicants file timely and correct forms initially, USAC should be able to reduce the money it spends on administering the fund because fewer appeals will be filed protesting the denial of funding for these types of issues. Therefore, we believe this additional opportunity to file the FCC Form 486 will improve the administration of fund. In addition, we note that the Commission has initiated a proceeding to address whether particular deadlines should be modified. 37 9. Finally, we are committed to guarding against waste, fraud, and abuse, and ensuring that funds disbursed through the E- rate program are used for appropriate purposes. Although we grant the appeals addressed here, this action in no way affects the authority of the Commission or USAC to conduct audits and investigations to determine compliance with the E- rate program rules and requirements. Because audits and investigations may provide information showing that a beneficiary or service provider failed to comply with the statute or Commission rules, such proceedings can reveal instances in which universal service funds were improperly disbursed or in a manner inconsistent with the statute or the Commission’s rules. To the extent we find that funds were not used properly, we will require USAC to recover such funds through its normal processes. We emphasize that we retain the discretion to evaluate the uses of monies disbursed through the E- rate program and to determine on a case- by- case basis that waste, fraud, or abuse of program funds occurred and that recovery is warranted. We remain committed to ensuring the integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 10. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1- 4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C. §§ 151- 154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54. 722( a) of the Commission’s rules, 47 35 Such 15- day notice shall be 15 calendar days’ notice, and shall commence on the date of receipt of such notice by applicant, or five (5) calendar days after such notice is postmarked as sent by USAC, whichever is sooner. Applicants will be presumed to have received notice five days after such notice is postmarked by USAC. USAC, however, shall continue to work beyond the 15 days with applicants attempting in good faith to file or amend their FCC Form 486. 36 We note that applicants will retain the ability to appeal decisions denying funding requests on the grounds discussed herein. 37 Comprehensive Review NPRM, 20 FCC Rcd at 11321, para. 29. 6 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 7 C. F. R. §§ 0. 91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722( a), that the Requests for Review and/ or Requests for Waiver filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1- 4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C. §§ 151- 154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0. 291, 1. 3 and 54.722( a) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1. 3, and 54.722( a), that the Requests for Review and/ or Requests for Waiver filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1- 4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C. §§ 151- 154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C. F. R. §§ 0. 91 and 0.291, USAC SHALL COMPLETE its review of each remanded application listed in the Appendix and ISSUE an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from release of this Order. 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order and the rules adopted herein SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 7 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 1- A Appendix: FCC Form 486 Deadline Petitions Applicant Application Number Funding Year Type of Appeal Alaska Gateway School District Tok, AK 412028 2004 Request for Review Andrews County Library Andrews, TX 440481 2005 Request for Review Antwerp Local School District Antwerp, OH 464507 2005 Request for Waiver Archbishop Neale School La Plata, MD 302737 2002 Request for Waiver Arlington Heights Memorial Library Arlington Heights, IL 415027 2004 Request for Waiver Bay County School District Panama City, FL 398681 2004 Request for Waiver Beaufort County School District Beaufort, SC 294836 2002 Request for Review Berrien County School District Nashville, GA 317226 2002 Request for Waiver Bledsoe County Public Library Pikeville, TN 301204 2002 Request for Review Bobover Yeshiva Bnei Zion Brooklyn, NY 291074 2002 Request for Waiver Bordertown Regional School District Bordertown, NJ 387135 2004 Request for Waiver Brooks County School District Quitman, GA 321413 2002 Request for Waiver Broome- Tioga BOCES Syracuse, NY 265671 2001 Request for Waiver Brown Public Library Northfield, VT 328164 2002 Request for Waiver 8 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 2- A Brunswick Central Schools Troy, NY 404068 2004 Request for Review Buffalo Independent School District Buffalo, TX 371183 2003 Request for Review Burgundy Farm Country Day School Alexandria, VA 191800 2000 Request for Review Cabarrus County School Systems Concord, NC 299281 302819 2002 Request for Waiver Carroll County School District Westminster, MD 302819 2002 Request for Review Central Kansas Library System Great Bend, KS 328836 2002 Request for Waiver Chattanooga- Hamilton County Bicentennial Library Chattanooga, TN 379922 2003 Request for Waiver Cherokee County School District Canton, GA 322398 2002 Request for Review Children's Home of Wyoming Conference Binghampton, NY 398068 2004 Request for Review Chino Valley High School No. 51 Chino Valley, AZ 330837 2002 Request for Review Chittenden Central SU 13 Montpelier, VT 415681 2004 Request for Review Church of St. Aidan Parish School Williston Park, NY 297395 2002 Request for Review Cinnaminson Township Public Schools Cinnaminson, NJ 356114 2003 Request for Review Cleveland Elementary School Cleveland, AL 362832 2003 Request for Waiver Clinton County Board of Education Albany, KY 291898 2002 Request for Waiver Colton Joint Unified School District Colton, CA 366876 2003 Request for Waiver 9 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 3- A Columbus Public Schools Columbus, OH 365588 2003 Request for Review and Waiver Community Consolidated School District 59 Arlington Heights, IL 328076 328077 2002 Request for Review Cundy's Harbor Library Harpswell, ME 292633 2002 Request for Waiver Diocese of Gallup Catholic Schools Cortez, CO 352887 2003 Request for Review Diocese of Gallup Catholic Schools Cortez, CO 355457 2003 Request for Review Douglas County School District 04 Roseburg, OR 431083, 430560 2004 Request for Review Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District Rosevill, CA 409881 2004 Request for Review Dubuque Community School District Dubuque, IA 327890 2002 Request for Review Eldora Public Library Eldora, IA 346316 2003 Request for Review Emerson Board of Education Syracuse, NY 280479 2001 Request for Review Estill Elementary School Estill, NC 234858 234895 234919 234944 2001 Request for Review Fair Haven School District Fair Haven, NJ 367738 2003 Request for Review Flint City School District Flint, MI 359243 2003 Request for Review Fort Plain Central School District Fort Plain, NY 412951 2004 Request for Review Fort Vancouver Regional Library District Vancouver, WA 291242 2002 Request for Waiver Galloway TWP School District Galloway, NJ 305849 2002 Request for Review 10 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 4- A Glades County School District Moore Haven, FL 453848, 454205 2005 Request for Waiver Good Shepherd School Baltimore, MD 266044 2001 Request for Review Good Shepherd School Frankfort, KY 172300 2000 Request for Waiver Grand Coulee Dam School District Coulee Dam, WA 298633 2002 Request for Waiver Hazlet Township School District Hazlet, NJ 361921 2003 Request for Review Hennepin County Library St. Paul, MN 359143 2003 Request for Review Hood River County School District Hood River, OR 364794 2003 Request for Review Hudson County Schools of Technology North Bergen, NJ 297875 2002 Request for Waiver Hull Public Library Hull, IA 298528 2002 Request for Review Illinois School for the Deaf Jacksonville, IL 347661 2003 Request for Review JEDI Distance Education Consortium Fort Atkinson, WI 327192 2002 Request for Waiver Jefferson County School Board Monticello, FL 459304 2005 Request for Waiver Karnes City Independent School District Karnes City, TX 357945 2003 Request for Waiver Knox County Schools Knoxville, TN 215885 2001 Request for Review La Gloria Independent Falfurrias, TX 178419 2000 Request for Review Lamar Consolidated Independent School District Rosenberg, TX 459460 2005 Request for Review 11 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 5- A Licking Valley Local School District Newark, OH 392774 2004 Request for Review Lifeline Center for Child Development, Inc. Queens Village, NY 409570 2004 Request for Review Lima City School District Lima, OH 470234 2005 Request for Review and Waiver Lindsay Unified School District Lindsay, CA 410849 411165 2004 Request for Review and Waiver Little Ferry School District Little Ferry, NJ 295815 2002 Request for Waiver Lowell Public Schools Lowell, MA 359824 2003 Request for Waiver Madison Metro School District Madison, WI 353089 353119 353212 2003 Request for Review Madison- Oneida BOCES Verona, NY 462476 2005 Request for Waiver Mahopac Public Library Mahopac, NY 402345 200 Request for Review Maine School Administration District No. 56 Searsport, ME 243128 243720 249415 249470 2001 Request for Waiver Martin Public School District Martin, MI 426227 2004 Request for Waiver Martins Ferry City School District Martins Ferry, OH 302365 2002 Request for Review and Waiver Modoc County Office of Education St. Alturas, CA 315896 2002 Request for Waiver Moline School District Moline, IL 356437 2003 Request for Review Monett School District R- 1 Monett, MO 300380 2002 Request for Review Montrose County School District Montrose, CO 427322 2004 Request for Review 12 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 6- A Morgan County School District Wartburg, TN 327398 2002 Request for Review and Waiver Municipal Telephone Exchange Baltimore, MD 267659 2001 Request for Waiver Nampa School District 131 Nampa, ID 318599 2002 Request for Waiver National School District National City, CA 230814 2001 Request for Review Nativity Academy at Saint Boniface Louisville, KY 419716 2004 Request for Waiver North Wasco County School District 21 The Dalles, OR 409053 2004 Request for Waiver Northwest Artic Borough School District Kotzebue, AK 406645 2004 Request for Review and Waiver Oakland Unified School District Oakland, CA 414456 417784 2004 Request for Waiver Oldham County Public Library Buckner, KY 400462 2004 Request for Review Ontario School District 8 C Ontario, OR 295232 2002 Request for Waiver Orange- Ulster BOCES Syracuse, NY 262616 2001 Request for Review Our Lady of Refuge Brooklyn, NY 203596 2000 Request for Review Phenix City School District Phenix City, AL 322329 323545 2002 Request for Review Pioneer Regional School Corporation Royal Center, IN 346650 2003 Request for Waiver Pitt County Schools Greenville, NC 254432 2001 Request for Review Plymouth- Canton Community Schools Plymouth, MI 375805 2003 Request for Waiver Prairie- Hills Elementary School District 144 Hazel Crest, IL 252724 2001 Request for Review 13 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 7- A Providence School District Providence, RI 289156 2002 Request for Review and Waiver Public Schools of Springfield, Massachusetts Springfield, MA 262612 2001 Request for Review Pueblo City School District 60 Pueblo, CO 398109 2004 Request for Review Quartzsite Elementary School District # 4 Ehrenberg, AZ 407280 2004 Request for Review Redlands United School District Redlands, CA 286577 2002 Request for Review Saint Bede School Ingleside, IL 302736 2002 Request for Waiver San Bernardino City Unified School District San Bernardino, CA 229943 229951 2001 Request for Waiver School District of Escambia County Pensacola, FL 459695 460757 464483 2005 Request for Waiver School District U- 46 Elgin, IL 387466 2004 Request for Review Schuylkill Intermediate Unit 29 Mar Lin, PA 412852 2004 Request for Waiver Seaford District Library Seaford, DE 186219 182411 2000 Request for Waiver Sherburne- Earlville Central School District Sherburne, NY 351972 2003 Request for Waiver Smyer Independent School District Smyer, TX 449773 2005 Request for Waiver Southeastern Regional Vocational- Technical School South Easton, MA 470921 2005 Request for Waiver Southwest Region School District Dillingham, AK 311369 2002 Request for Review and Waiver Spring Hill Unified School District 230 Spring Hill, KS 289683 2002 Request for Review 14 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 8- A St. Bernadette School Seattle, WA 358930 2003 Request for Review St. Luke's Lutheran School St. Louis, MO 364411 364448 2003 Request for Review St. Malachy School Rantoul, IL 339842 2003 Request for Review Sweetwater County School District No. 2 Green River, WY 392435 392334 392324 392416 2004 Request for Waiver Talullah Falls Schools Talullah Falls, GA 410133 2004 Request for Review Tanana City School District Tanana, AK 381012 2003 Request for Waiver Texas Education Telecommunications Network Austin, TX 330978 2002 Request for Review and Waiver The School District of Marlboro County Bennettsville, SC 376637 2003 Request for Review Union Beach Public Schools Union Beach, NJ 203423 2000 Request for Review Vernon Verona Sherrill City School District Verona, NY 355243 2003 Request for Review Washington State Department of Information Services Olympia, WA 229488 2001 Request for Review Washington State Department of Information Services Olympia, WA 406070 2004 Request for Review Western Christian High School Hull, IA 298244 2002 Request for Review Whitman- Hanson Regional School District Whitman, MA 429515 2004 Request for Review Windsor School District Windsor, VT 337525 2003 Request for Review 15 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 1871 9- A Wiscasset School Department Wiscasset, ME 398615 2004 Request for Waiver Yukon Flats School District Fort Yukon, AK 435210 2004 Request for Review 16