*Pages 1--2 from  Microsoft Word - 61454.doc*
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA-  06-  2467 
 Before  the  Federal  Communications  Commission 
 Washington,  D.  C.  20554 


 GREGORY  J.  WOLFE  d/  b/  a  WESTERN  PAYPHONE  SYSTEMS, 
 Complainant, 
 v. 
 WORLD  COMMUNICATION  GROUP  SERVICES,  LTD., 


 Defendant. 


 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 ) 


 File  No.  EB-  06-  MD-  009 


 ORDER  OF  DISMISSAL 
 Adopted:  December  5,  2006  Released:  December  6,  2006 
 By  the  Chief,  Market  Disputes  Resolution  Division,  Enforcement  Bureau: 
 1.  On  November  13,  2006,  complainant  Gregory  J.  Wolfe  d/  b/  a  Western  Payphone  Systems  (“  Western  Payphone”)  filed  a  motion  to  dismiss,  with  prejudice,  its  complaint  1  against 
 World  Communication  Group  Services,  Ltd.  (“  World  Communication  Group”).  2  The  Complaint  alleges  that  World  Communication  Group  violated  sections  201(  b)  and  276(  b)(  1)(  A)  of  the  Act, 
 as  well  as  the  Commission’s  rules,  by  failing  to  pay  dial-  around  compensation  owed  to  Western  Payphone.  3  According  to  the  Motion,  the  parties  have  “reached  a  mutually  acceptable  resolution 
 of  [their]  dispute.”  4  World  Communication  Group  does  not  oppose  the  Motion.  5 
 2.  We  are  satisfied  that  dismissing  the  Complaint  with  prejudice  and  permanently  terminating  this  proceeding  will  serve  the  public  interest  by  promoting  the  private  resolution  of 


 disputes  and  by  eliminating  the  need  for  further  litigation  and  the  expenditure  of  further  time  and  resources  of  the  parties  and  this  Commission. 


 3.  Accordingly,  IT  IS  ORDERED,  pursuant  to  sections  1,  4(  i),  4(  j),  and  208  of  the  Communications  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  47  U.  S.  C.  §§  151,  154(  i),  154(  j),  and  208,  and  the 


 1  Western  Payphone  Systems  Formal  Complaint  for  Payphone  Compensation,  File  No.  EB-  06-  MD-  009  (filed 
 Sept.  21,  2006)  (“  Complaint”).  2 
 Motion  to  Dismiss,  File  No.  EB-  06-  MD-  009  (filed  Nov.  13,  2006)  (“  Motion”).  3 
 Complaint  at  9,  11-  12.  4 
 Motion  at  1.  5 
 Motion  at  2. 
1
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA-  06-  2467 
 2 
 authority  delegated  in  sections  0.111,  0.311,  and  1.720-  1.736  of  the  Commission’s  rules,  47  C.  F.  R.  §§  0.111,  0.311,  and  1.720-  1.736,  that  the  Motion  is  GRANTED,  and  that  the  Complaint 
 is  DISMISSED  with  prejudice. 
 FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 


 Alexander  P.  Starr  Chief,  Market  Disputes  Resolution  Division 
 Enforcement  Bureau 
2