*Pages 1--2 from  Microsoft Word - 54264.doc*
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  06-  47 
 Before  the  FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 
 Washington,  D.  C.  20554 


 In  the  Matter  of 
 APCC  Services,  Inc.,  Data  Net  Systems,  LLC, 
 Davel  Communications,  Inc.,  Jaroth,  Inc.  d/  b/  a  Pacific  Telemanagement  Services, 
 and  Intera  Communications  Corp., 


 Complainants, 
 v. 
 Tel-  America  of  Salt  Lake  City,  Inc., 
 Defendant. 


 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 
 )  ) 


 File  No.  EB-  05-  MD-  018 


 ORDER  OF  DISMISSAL 
 Adopted:  January  11,  2006  Released:  January  11,  2006 
 By  the  Deputy  Chief,  Market  Disputes  Resolution  Division,  Enforcement  Bureau: 
 1.  On  August  12,  2005,  APCC  Services,  Inc.,  Data  Net  Systems,  LLC,  Davel  Communications,  Inc.,  Jaroth,  Inc.  d/  b/  a  Pacific  Telemanagement  Services,  and  Intera  Communications  Corp.  filed  a  formal 
 complaint  pursuant  to  section  208  of  the  Communications  Act  of  1934,  as  amended  (“  Act”),  1  against  Tel-America  of  Salt  Lake  City,  Inc.  2  The  Complainants  alleged  that  Tel-  America  had  violated  sections 
 201(  b),  416(  c),  and  276  of  the  Act  by  failing  to  pay  dial-  around  compensation  to  the  payphone  service  provider  Complainants.  3 


 1  47  U.  S.  C.  §  208. 
 2  See  Formal  Complaint,  File  No.  EB-  05-  MD-  018  (filed  Aug.  12,  2005)  (“  Complaint”). 


 3  47  U.  S.  C.  §§  201(  b),  416(  c),  and  276  . 
1
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  06-  47 
 2 
 2.  On  December  14,  2005,  the  Complainants  filed  a  motion  requesting  that  we  dismiss  the  Complaint  with  prejudice.  4  The  Defendants  filed  no  opposition.  We  grant  the  Motion  to  Dismiss. 
 Dismissing  the  Complaint  at  this  stage  is  appropriate  and  will  serve  the  public  interest  by  promoting  the  private  resolution  of  disputes  and  eliminating  the  expenditure  of  further  time  and  resources  of  the  parties 
 and  the  Commission. 
 3.  ACCORDINGLY,  IT  IS  ORDERED,  pursuant  to  sections  4(  i),  4(  j),  and  208  of  the  Communications  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  47  U.  S.  C.  §§  154(  i),  154(  j),  and  208,  and  sections  1.720- 
 1.736  of  the  Commission's  rules,  47  C.  F.  R.  §§  1.720-  1.736,  and  the  authority  delegated  by  sections  0.111  and  0.311  of  the  Commission’s  rules,  47  C.  F.  R.  §§  0.111,  0.311,  that  the  above-  captioned  complaint  IS 
 DISMISSED  WITH  PREJUDICE  in  its  entirety  and  the  proceeding  is  TERMINATED. 


 FEDERAL  COMMUNICATIONS  COMMISSION 


 Rosemary  McEnery  Deputy  Chief 
 Market  Disputes  Resolution  Division  Enforcement  Bureau 


 4  Motion  to  Dismiss,  File  No.  EB-  05-  MD-  018  (filed  Dec.  14,  2005). 
2