*Pages 1--2 from  Microsoft Word - 56146.doc*
 Federal  Communications  Commission  Washington,  D.  C.  20554 
 DA  06-  769 
 March  31,  2006 
 J.  Dominic  Monahan  Luvaas  Cobb 
 777  High  Street,  Suite  300  Eugene,  OR  97401 


 Re:  Call  Sign  E060047  File  No.  SES-  LIC-  20060217-  00268 
 Call  Sign  E060046  File  No.  SES-  LIC-  20060217-  00267 


 Dear  Mr.  Monahan: 
 On  February  17,  2006,  Carol  L.  Ives  filed  the  above-  captioned  applications  for  authority  to  operate  Ku-  Band  1  earth  stations  in  Titusville  and  White  Springs,  Florida.  For  the 
 reasons  discussed  below,  we  dismiss  both  applications  as  defective,  without  prejudice  to  refiling.  2 


 A  review  of  the  applications  reveals  that  the  application  does  not  include  the  antenna  transmits  Antenna  Gain  (Item  E42  of  Schedule  B  of  Form  312).  In  addition,  neither 
 application  includes  the  required  radiation  hazard  analysis  in  response  to  question  28  of  the  312  Main  Form.  As  a  result,  both  applications  are  defective  and  will  be  dismissed. 


 While  we  dismiss  both  applications  on  the  above  basis,  we  take  the  opportunity  to  apprise  you  of  another  concern  we  have  with  the  applications. 
 In  response  to  Items  E54  and  E55  of  Schedule  B,  Carol  L.  Ives  indicates  that  the  eastern  satellite  arc  limit  is  60  o  E.  L.  Since  the  earth  stations  in  Florida  are  not  within  line  of  sight 
 of  a  satellite  that  far  east,  this  cannot  be  correct.  Please  correct  this  in  any  refiling. 


 1  11.  7-  12.2  and  14.  0-  14.  5  GHz  bands. 
 2  If  Carol  L.  Ives  re-  files  an  application  identical  to  the  one  dismissed,  with  the  exception  of 
 supplying  the  missing  information,  it  need  not  pay  an  application  fee.  See  47  C.  F.  R.  §  1.1109(  d). 
1
 Federal  Communications  Commission  DA  06-  769 
 2 
 Accordingly,  pursuant  to  Section  25.112(  a)  (1)  of  the  Commission's  rules,  47  C.  F.  R.  §  25.112(  a)  (1),  and  Section  0.261  of  the  Commission’s  rules  on  delegations  of  authority, 
 47  C.  F.  R.  §  0.261,  we  dismiss  both  applications  as  defective  without  prejudice  to  refiling. 


 Sincerely, 


 Scott  A.  Kotler  Chief,  Systems  Analysis  Branch 
 Satellite  Division  International  Bureau 
2