*Pages 1--2 from Microsoft Word - 56453.doc* Federal Communications Commission Washington, D. C. 20554 DA 06- 851 April 14, 2006 Mr. Rhett R McMahon Interstate Communications, Inc. 10500 Coursey Boulevard Suite 104 Baton Rouge, LA 70816 Re: NOTICE OF DISMISSAL FRN: 0001722396 File Nos. SES- RWL- 20060209- 00218 Call Sign E7107 Dear Mr. McMahon: On February 7, 2006, Interstate Communications, Inc. filed a renewal application for a C- Band 1 Fixed Earth Station license in Baton Rouge, LA. We dismiss the application without prejudice to refiling for Interstate Communications, Inc. ’s failure to pay delinquent Commission debts. Pursuant to Section 1.1910( a)( 1) of the Commission’s rules, the Commission examines each application to determine whether the applicant is delinquent in any non-tax debt owed to the Commission. 2 On February 8, 2006, the Commission notified Interstate Communications, Inc. that it was delinquent on the payment of debts owed to the Commission. 3 The letter stated that if full payment or satisfactory arrangement to pay the delinquent debt was not made within 30 days of the date of the letter, Interstate Communications, Inc. ’s application would be dismissed pursuant to Section 1.1910( b)( 3) 1 3700- 4200 and 5925- 6425 MHz bands. 2 47 C. F. R. § 1.1910( a)( 1). See Amendment of Parts 0 and 1 of the Commission’s Rules – Implementation of the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 and Adoption of Rules Governing Applications or Requests for Benefits by Delinquent Debtors, 19 FCC 6540 (2004); 47 C. F. R. § 1. 1910. For the purpose of determining if an applicant is delinquent, the Commission checks the status of all entities with whom an applicant shares the same tax payer identification number. 3 Letter from M. Washington, Acting Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, Office of Managing Director, FCC to Mr. Rhett R McMahon, Interstate Communications, Inc. (February 8, 2006). 1 Federal Communications Commission DA 06- 851 of the rules. 4 The Commission has not received payment of the debts identified in the letter, nor has Interstate Communications, Inc. made other satisfactory payment arrangements with the Commission. Accordingly, pursuant to 47 C. F. R. § 1.1910( b)( 3) and the Commission’s rules on delegated authority, 47 C. F. R. § 0.261, the above- referenced application filed by Interstate Communications, Inc. is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling. Sincerely, Scott A. Kotler Chief, Systems Analysis Branch Satellite Division International Bureau 4 See 47 C. F. R. § 1.1910( b)( 3). 2