Federal Communications Commission DA 07-2198 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of United Telephone Company of Kansas United Telephone Company of Eastern Kansas and Twin Valley Telephone, Inc. Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of “Study Area” Contained in Part 36 of the Commission’s Rules; Petition for Waiver of Section 69.3(e)(11) of the Commission’s Rules Petition for Clarification or Waiver of Section 54.305 of the Commission’s Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-45 ORDER Adopted: May 25, 2007 Released: May 25, 2007 By the Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: 1. On October 10, 2006, Twin Valley Telephone, Inc. (Twin Valley) filed a Petition for Clarification of the effective date of the Wireline Competition Bureau’s order granting it waivers of the study area boundary freeze and section 69.3(e)(11) of the Commission’s rules.1 On April 26, 2006, Twin Valley filed a request to withdraw the Petition for Clarification.2 We grant Twin Valley’s request for withdrawal. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, and 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that Twin Valley’s request to withdraw its Petition for Clarification IS GRANTED. 1 See United Telephone Company of Kansas, United Telephone of Eastern Kansas, and Twin Valley Telephone, Inc., Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of “Study Area” of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission’s Rules, Petition for Waiver of Section 69.3(e)(11) of the Commission’s Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Petition for Clarification (filed Oct. 10, 2006) (Petition for Clarification); United Telephone Company of Kansas, United Telephone of Eastern Kansas, and Twin Valley Telephone, Inc., Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of “Study Area” of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission’s Rules, Petition for Waiver of Section 69.3(e)(11) of the Commission’s Rules, Petition for Clarification or Waiver of Section 54.305 of the Commission’s Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 21 FCC Rcd 10111 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2006). No comments were filed with respect to the Petition for Clarification. 2 See United Telephone Company of Kansas, United Telephone of Eastern Kansas, and Twin Valley Telephone, Inc., Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of “Study Area” of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission’s Rules, Petition for Waiver of Section 69.3(e)(11) of the Commission’s Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45, Request to Withdraw Petition for Clarification (filed Apr. 26, 2006). Federal Communications Commission DA 07-2198 2 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, and 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that Twin Valleys’ Petition for Clarification IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renée R. Crittendon Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau