Federal Communications Commission DA 07-2747 
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the matter of
Amendment of Section 73.202(b), 
Table of Allotments,
FM Broadcast Stations.
(Ammon and Dubois, Idaho)
)
)
)
)
)
)
MB Docket No. 04-427
RM-11127
RM-11239
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
(Proceeding Terminated)
Adopted: June 20, 2007   Released: June 22, 2007
By the Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau:
1. The Audio Division has before it a Petition for Reconsideration filed jointly by Millcreek 
Broadcasting, LLC, licensee of Stations KNJQ(FM), Manti, Utah, KUUU(FM), South Jordan, Utah, and 
KUDD(FM), Roy, Utah; Simmons SLC-LS, LLC, licensee of Stations KDWY(FM), Diamondville, 
Wyoming, KAOX(FM), Kemmerer, Wyoming, and KRAR(FM), Brigham City, Utah; Rocky Mountain 
Radio Network, Inc., licensee of Station KRMF(FM), Evanston, Wyoming; 3 Point Media -- Coalville, 
LLC, licensee of Station KCUA(FM), Naples, Utah, and College Creek Broadcasting, LLC, successful 
bidder and applicant for four vacant auction allotments (“Joint Parties”), directed to the Report and 
Order1 in this matter. The Joint Parties had filed a Counterproposal in this proceeding, which was 
dismissed as defective. The Report and Order granted the allotment of Channel 286A at Dubois, Idaho as 
the community’s first local aural transmission service.  
2. Joint Parties now request to withdraw their Petition for Reconsideration, stating that they 
have filed counterproposals in other proceedings that effectuate most of the same changes.  They attach
affidavits pursuant to Section 1.420(j).  
3. We will grant the Joint Parties’ request to withdraw and dismiss the Petition for 
Reconsideration.2  
4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, That the aforementioned proceeding IS TERMINATED.
  
1 Ammon and Dubois, Idaho, Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd 10626 (MB 2005).
2 In addition to their request to withdraw their Petition for Reconsideration, Joint Petitioners urge the Bureau, on its 
own motion, to clarify its determination that aspects of the counterproposal were defective on technical grounds.  
Specifically, the Report and Order held that the proposal to substitute Channel 294C for Channel 293C at Spanish 
Fork, Utah would not provide city-grade coverage to any part of the community of Spanish Fork.  It also held that  
three other proposed allotments, Channel 288C at Oakley, Utah, Channel 296C at Henefer, Utah, and  Channel 
296C2 at Huntington, Utah, did not appear to be feasible because of terrain obstructions which would require 
maximum facilities requiring an extremely tall tower to place a city-grade signal over each respective community.  
We decline to do so.  The Commission has broad discretion whether to issue a declaratory ruling.  See Yale 
Broadcasting Company v. F.C.C., 473 F.2d 594, 602 (D.C.Cir. 1973); see also, In the Matter of Lorillard Tobacco 
Company, Order, 22 FCC Rcd 4917, 4920 (MB 2007).  These matters are no longer relevant to the resolution of this 
proceeding.
Federal Communications Commission                                 DA  07-2747 
2
5. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Victoria M. McCauley (202) 418-
2180.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
John A. Karousos 
Assistant Chief 
Audio Division
Media Bureau