Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
DA 07-2938
July 2, 2007
 Susan Crandall
Intelsat LLC
c/o Intelsat Corporation
3400 International Drive, N.W.
Washington, DC  20008-3006
 RE: Call Sign E070096
File No.:  SES-LIC-20070523-00713
Dear Ms. Crandall:
On May 23, 2007, Intelsat LLC (Intelsat) filed the above-captioned license application for a fixed-satellite 
service earth station that will use a 13.10 meter antenna1 in the Ku-band.2  Using this earth station, Intelsat 
proposes to use this earth station to communicate with ALSAT-designated satellites.  For the reasons 
stated below, we dismiss the application as defective without prejudice to refiling.3
Section 25.112 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112, requires the Commission to return, as 
unacceptable for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete, that contains 
internal inconsistencies, or that does not substantially comply with the Commission’s rules.  Intelsat’s 
application does not comply with the Commission’s rules, which renders it unacceptable and subject to 
dismissal.  The deficiency is as follows:
In response to item E49 of Schedule B, Intelsat lists a maximum equivalent isotropically radiated power 
(eirp) density per carrier for emission designator 36M0G7W of the transmit frequency as 44.8
dBW/4kHz.  This value is less than, and therefore inconsistent with, the average value of 45.45 
dBW/4kHz that we calculate using the 85.0 dBW eirp value Intelsat provides in response to item E48 of 
Schedule B and the 36 MHz bandwidth from item E47 for the corresponding emission.  Given this 
inconsistency, we cannot determine the proposed emission power.
  
1 In response to item E42 of Schedule B, we note that Intelsat should list the receive frequency for the antenna 
gain as 12 GHz rather than as 11 GHz.
.  
2 11.7-12.2 and 14.0-14.5 GHz bands.
3 If Intelsat refiles an application identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of supplying the corrected 
information, it need not pay an application fee.  See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1109(d).
 Federal Communications Commission                  DA 07-2938
2
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §25.112(a)(1), and 
Section 0.261 of the Commission’s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. §0.261, we dismiss 
Intelsat’s applications without prejudice to refiling.
Sincerely,
Scott A. Kotler
Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
Satellite Division
International Bureau