Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
AIRWAVE WIRELESS, L.L.C. and
GW WIRELESS, Inc.
Requests for Waiver and Extension of the 
Broadband PCS Construction Requirements
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
File Nos. 0001766623 and 0001766622
File No. 0001774393
ORDER
Adopted: January 30, 2007 Released: January 30, 2007
By the Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. In this Order, we address the requests filed by broadband Personal Communications 
Services (PCS) licensees Airwave Wireless, L.L.C. (Airwave) and GW Wireless, Inc. (GW), in which 
they seek a waiver or extension1 of the construction requirements found in section 24.203 of the 
Commission’s rules.2 For the reasons outlined below, we grant Airwave a conditional waiver of its five-
year construction requirement to allow the implementation of its proposed three-phase deployment plan 
regarding the C Block PCS license, call sign WPOJ826, located in the Huron, South Dakota Basic 
Trading Area (“BTA”),3 and for the C Block PCS license, call sign WPOJ827, located in the Mitchell, 
South Dakota BTA.  Similarly, we grant GW a conditional waiver of its five-year construction 
requirement to allow the implementation of its proposed three-phase deployment plan for the E Block 
PCS license, call sign WPOJ757, located in the Mitchell, South Dakota BTA.
  
1 See File Nos. 0001766623 and 0001766622, filed on June 9, 2004, and amended on June 18, 2004 (Airwave 
Request), and 0001774393, filed on June 9, 2004 (GW Request).  Airwave amended its Request again on June 17, 
2005 (Airwave Supplement), and GW amended its Request on June 23, 2005 (GW Supplement).  At the request of 
Commission staff, the parties amended their requests again on July 29, 2005 (Joint Supplement), to provide 
additional information regarding their plans for construction.
2 47 C.F.R. § 24.203.  In this Order, we consider the waiver requests collectively because the licensees propose 
jointly-operated PCS systems, share regulatory counsel, jointly filed the July 29, 2005, supplement, and have made 
nearly identical proposals to roll out a three-phase deployment plan to provide extensive coverage in their licensed 
markets.
3 We note that Rand McNally & Company owns the copyright to the BTA listings.  See Rand McNally, 1992 
Commercial Atlas and Marketing Guide at 36-39 (123d ed. 1992).  There are 487 BTAs covering fifty states and the 
District of Columbia.  For its spectrum auctions, the Commission added additional BTA-like areas for American 
Samoa; Guam; Northern Mariana Islands; San Juan, Puerto Rico; Mayaguez-Aguadilla-Ponce, Puerto Rico; and the 
U.S. Virgin Islands.
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
2
II. BACKGROUND
2. Airwave is a small business consortium consisting of seven South Dakota rural telephone 
companies, rural telephone cooperatives, and rural telco subsidiaries.4 GW is a wholly-owned subsidiary 
of Golden West Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc. (Golden West), a rural telephone cooperative.5 In 
Auction No. 22, Airwave won the 30 MHz C Block broadband PCS licenses in the Huron, South Dakota 
BTA and in the Mitchell, South Dakota BTA.  In the same auction, GW won the 10 MHz E Block 
broadband PCS license in the Mitchell, South Dakota BTA.  The three licenses were granted on June 30, 
1999, establishing June 30, 2004, as the five-year construction deadline.6 Under section 24.203 of the 
Commission’s rules, new PCS licensees must meet certain construction benchmarks showing sufficient 
progress toward construction of their systems.7 Failure to make the required showing by the deadline 
results in the automatic termination of the licenses, unless the Commission grants a waiver of the 
construction rules or an extension of time to construct.8
3. On June 9, 2004, Airwave and GW filed interrelated requests for waiver or extension of 
the five-year broadband PCS construction requirements.9 In the requests, the parties ask the Commission 
to either: (i) waive the five-year construction requirement and require only a substantial service showing 
at license renewal, or (ii) extend the construction deadline for the stations by nine months.10 Later, they 
amended their waiver requests to propose a new build-out plan and timetable.  According to Airwave and 
GW, the original plan was reevaluated after the Commission modified its rules to allow PCS licensees to 
meet their construction obligations by providing substantial service in their license areas.11 Airwave and 
GW explain that because of this rule change, and after discussions with Commission staff, they decided to 
construct systems capable of providing wireless voice and data services (including limited internet 
access), based on the 1xRTT transmission standard.12 The parties propose to complete construction of 
their systems in three phases and request that the Commission approve the revised build out schedule.13
  
4 The members of Airwave include: Hanson Communications, Inc; Interstate Satellite Services, Inc; Midstate 
Communications, Inc; Northern Valley Wireless, Inc; Santel Communications Cooperative, Inc; Valley Cable and 
Satellite Communications, Inc; and Venture Communications, Inc.
5 GW Waiver Request at 2.
6 See 47 C.F.R. § 24.203(a)-(b).
7 Id. For its 30 MHz broadband PCS licenses, Airwave was originally required to provide service to at least one-
third of the population of its BTAs within five years of initial license grant.  For its 10 MHz broadband PCS license, 
GW was required to provide service to at least one-quarter of the population of its BTA, or make a showing of 
substantial service, within five years of initial license grant.  On September 27, 2004, the Commission extended the 
substantial service option to, inter alia, 30 MHz PCS licensees.  See Facilitating the Provision of Spectrum-Based 
Services to Rural Areas and promoting Opportunities for Rural Telephone Companies to Provide Spectrum-Based 
Services, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 19 FCC Rcd 19078, 19120-21 ¶ 75 
(2004) (Rural R&O and FNPRM).
8 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.946(c), 24.203(a)-(b).
9 See Airwave Request; GW Request.
10 See Airwave Request at 22; GW Request at 19.
11 See Airwave Supplement at 2; GW Supplement at 2.  See also, Rural R&O and FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd 19078 
(2004).
12 Airwave Supplement at 2; GW Supplement at 2.  1xRTT, also known as CDMA2000, is a radio transmission 
technology upgrade for CDMA carriers that doubles voice capacity and delivers peak data rates of 307 kbps in 
mobile environments and typical speeds of 40-70 kbps.  See Implementation of Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus 
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993; Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions With Respect to 
(continued....)
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
3
2. Build-Out Plans.  For Phase I, Airwave proposes to construct 1xRTT facilities covering 
the populations of Huron and Mitchell, South Dakota, and GW proposes to construct 1xRTT facilities 
covering the population of Mitchell, South Dakota.14 Both systems will be capable of providing voice 
and data services, including limited internet access.15 In their supplemental filings, Airwave and GW 
state that the completion of Phase I should take 90 days,16 and they argue that the resulting coverage will 
satisfy the Commission’s “newly adopted substantial service standard.”17 For Phase II, the parties plan to 
construct 1xRTT facilities covering the next tier of larger towns within each of their BTAs.18 In this 
phase, coverage will be extended to include “substantial portions of Interstate 90, which traverses the 
entire state of South Dakota.”19 Airwave and GW state that Phase II will be completed within one year of 
the end of Phase I.20 Finally, for Phase III, Airwave proposes to “construct at least 1xRTT coverage to all 
or most of those rural telephone service areas within the Huron and Mitchell BTAs certificated by the 
South Dakota Public Service Commission to be served by telephone companies that participate in 
Airwave, and to many adjoining areas.”21 Similarly, GW proposes 1xRTT coverage “to all or most of 
those rural telephone service areas within the Mitchell BTA certificated by the South Dakota Public 
Service Commission to be served by Vivian Telephone Company, and to many adjoining areas.”22 Both 
Airwave and GW state that Phase III will be completed within three years of the end of the initial Phase I 
build-out.23
3. On July 29, 2005, Airwave and GW provided additional details regarding the Phase III 
coverage over the rural telephone service areas certificated by the South Dakota Public Service 
Commission.24 In particular, a map included in their Joint Supplement shows the areas served by the 
telephone cooperative members of Airwave and GW.25 These areas extend throughout the Huron and 
Mitchell BTAs, where there are few towns or major roadways.26 The map also shows the sparsely-
populated communities that will receive service after construction is completed.27 The parties contend 
that most of these communities lack reliable wireless services and that there is only analog cellular 
  
(...continued from previous page)
Commercial Mobile Services, Ninth Report, 19 FCC Rcd 20597, 20650, ¶ 129 (2004) (Ninth CMRS Competition 
Report).
13 See Airwave Supplement at 8, 11; GW Supplement at 8,11.
14 Airwave Supplement at 4; GW Supplement at 4.
15 Airwave Supplement at 2; GW Supplement at 2.
16 See Airwave Supplement at 4; GW Supplement at 4.
17 Airwave Supplement at 2; GW Supplement at 2.
18 Airwave Supplement at 5; GW Supplement at 5.
19 Airwave Supplement at 5; GW Supplement at 5.
20 Airwave Supplement at 5; GW Supplement at 5.
21 Airwave Supplement at 5.
22 GW Supplement at 5.  Vivian Telephone Company is a subsidiary of Golden West.  
23 Airwave Supplement at 5; GW Supplement at 5.
24 See Joint Supplement at 2-4.
25 Id. at Attachment A.
26 See id. at 6.
27 Id. at Attachment A.  In this Order, Appendix A lists the specific areas of coverage as proposed in the deployment 
plans.
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
4
service, or where there is digital cellular coverage, it is plagued by “poor building penetration and 
coverage gaps as soon as you exit the community.”28 They also point out that because of severe weather 
conditions, especially during the winter months when temperatures drop to well below freezing, reliable 
wireless communications are critical.29 Airwave and GW plan to provide reliable 1xRTT signal coverage 
“and eventually add EV-DO to a majority of these sites.”30 They also plan to cover rural areas between 
these communities, where there is “no reliable wireless service of any sort.”31
II. DISCUSSION
4. We find that a conditional waiver of the construction deadline in this case is warranted.32  
In particular, we conclude that in light of unique circumstances, the public interest will be served by 
extending the construction deadline and allowing Airwave and GW time to construct the advanced 
systems described in their three-phased deployment plans.  We therefore partially grant the requests for 
waiver by extending the construction deadline for the subject licenses until June 30, 2009.  As explained 
in greater detail below, the relief granted in this Order is conditioned on the timely completion of each 
phase of the build-out proposals as detailed in Appendix A.
5. As an initial matter, we agree with Airwave and GW that the Huron and Mitchell BTAs 
are unique because of their especially rural character.33 For example, in the Huron BTA the average 
population density is 6.19 persons per square mile, and in the Mitchell BTA it is 6.09 persons per square 
mile.34 This is substantially less than the Commission’s definition of rural areas, which is “100 persons 
  
28 Joint Supplement at 4.
29 See Airwave Supplement at 7; GW Supplement at 7.  The parties note that temperatures in South Dakota can drop 
to minus fifty-eight degrees Fahrenheit.
30 Joint Supplement at 4.  One of the next steps in the CDMA migration beyond 1xRTT is CDMA2000 1X EV-DO 
(evolution-data only, "EV-DO").  CDMA2000 1XEV-DO puts voice and data on separate channels to achieve a data 
rate of 2.4 Mbps.  See, e.g., Ninth CMRS Competition Report, 19 FCC Rcd at 20650 ¶¶ 128-129.
31 Joint Supplement at 5.
32 Under section 1.925 of the Commission’s rules, a waiver may be granted if the petitioner establishes either that: 
(1) the underlying purpose of the rule would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, 
and that grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (2) where the petitioner establishes unique or unusual 
factual circumstances, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome, or contrary to the public 
interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative.  47 C.F.R. § 1.925.  See Amendment of the Commission’s 
Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, GEN Docket No. 90-314, Memorandum Opinion and 
Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957, 5019 (1994) (Commission would consider waiving the PCS construction requirements on a 
case-by-case basis where circumstances are unique and public interest served), citing WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 
1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969).  Alternatively, pursuant to section 1.3, the Commission has authority to waive its rules if 
there is “good cause” to do so.  47 C.F.R. § 1.3.  See Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164 (D.C. 
Cir. 1990).  In addition, pursuant to sections 1.946(e) and 24.843(b) of the Commission’s rules, an extension of time 
to complete construction may be granted if the licensee shows that the failure to complete construction is due to 
causes beyond its control.  47 C.F.R. §§ 1.946(e), 24.843(b).  Section 1.946(e) lists specific circumstances that 
would not warrant an extension of time to complete construction.  47 C.F.R. § 1.946(e)(2)-(3).
33 See Airwave Supplement at 10; see also GW Supplement at 9-10.
34 Out of nine counties in the Huron BTA, only Beadle County and Hughes County have population densities greater 
than ten people per square mile, and both of these have relatively low total populations.  Beadle County’s population 
density is 13.5 people per square mile and its total population is 17,023.  Hughes County’s population density is 
22.2 people per square mile and its total population is 16,481.  U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census 2000.  Similarly,  
out of fifteen counties in the Mitchell BTA, only Davison County has a population density of more than ten people 
per square mile.  Davison County’s population density is 43 people per square mile and its total population is 
18,741.  Id.
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
5
per square mile or less.”35 Also, of the 493 BTAs in the United States, only sixteen have population 
densities as low as the Huron and Mitchell BTAs, making these some of the most rural market areas in the 
country.36
6. We also agree with Airwave and GW that these markets are unique because their 
populations are unusually dispersed.  For example, out of the twenty BTAs in the United States with the 
lowest population densities, there are only six, including Huron and Mitchell, where the largest 
population center accounts for less than 25% percent of the population of the BTA.37 This is significant 
because “high concentrations of subscribers make it easier for operators to provide adequate coverage 
with less infrastructure deployment.”38  Airwave and GW reason that the absence of a large population 
center, combined with the low population densities throughout these rural markets, are unique 
circumstances supporting an extension of the construction requirements.39
7. In addition, we find that the widespread provision of advanced, mobile voice and data 
PCS services (as described in the Airwave and GW proposals) will serve the public interest.  According to 
Airwave and GW, available wireless options in many parts of the Huron and Mitchell market areas are 
limited and unreliable.40 At the same time, there is a great need for wireless connectivity in these rural 
areas, where reliable communications can help save lives.  This is particularly true because of severe 
weather conditions in South Dakota.41 Thus, coverage over all of Interstate 90 within the Mitchell 
BTA—as planned in Phase III—will benefit local residents, commuters, travelers, and public safety 
personnel that use the highway.42 Consumers will also benefit from the introduction of advanced PCS 
  
35 Rural R&O and FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 19086-87, ¶ 11.  In that Order, the Commission established a baseline 
definition of “rural area” as those counties (or equivalent) with a population density of 100 persons per square mile 
or less, based upon the most recently available Census data.  Id.  One of the reasons that the Commission adopted 
the 100 persons per square mile definition was to “promote service to consumers in rural areas,” which is exactly 
what we hope to achieve with today’s action.  Id. at 19086, ¶ 10.
36 They are: Aberdeen, South Dakota (BTA 1), Anchorage, Alaska (BTA 14), Billings, Montana (BTA 41), Butte, 
Montana (BTA64), Casper, Wyoming (BTA 69), Dickinson, North Dakota (BTA 113), Fairbanks, Alaska (BTA 
136), Great Falls, Montana (BTA 171), Juneau, Alaska (BTA 221), Klamath Falls, Oregon (BTA 231), McCook, 
Nebraska (BTA 270), North Platte, Nebraska (BTA 325), Riverton, Wyoming (BTA 375), Rock Springs, Wyoming 
(BTA 381), Scottsbluff, Nebraska (BTA 411), and Williston, North Dakota (BTA 476).
37 In addition to Huron and Mitchell, the other four BTAs are Klamath Falls, Oregon (BTA 231), McCook, 
Nebraska (BTA 270), Riverton, Wyoming (BTA 375), and Scottsbluff, Nebraska (BTA 411).  Airwave states that if 
it were to provide service to the largest population centers in its markets, coverage would extend to only 23.4% in 
the Huron BTA and to 16.4% of the population in the Mitchell BTA.  Airwave Request at 4.
38 Implementation of Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993; Annual Report and 
Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions With Respect to Commercial Mobile Services, Tenth Report and Order, 
20 FCC Rcd 15908, 15927 ¶ 49, n.87 (2005)  (referring to Eugence C. Signorini, Wireless Coverage in the United 
States: Leaving a Lot to Be Desired, THE YANKEE GROUP REPORT, Vol. 1, No. 11, Aug. 2000, at 8).  
Therefore, to meet the 25% or 33% population coverage requirements under section 22.203 of the Commission’s 
rules, the licensees would need to build infrastructure covering two or more of the largest cities in each BTA.
39 Airwave Request at 4; GW Request at 14.
40 See, e.g., Joint Supplement at 4.
41 In Mitchell, S.D. for example, average low temperatures are near or below freezing seven months out of the year.  
In January, the average low is 4 degrees Fahrenheit and the record low was minus 50 degrees set in 1955.  These 
temperatures do not include wind-chill, which would make it feel even colder.  See 
http://weather.msn.com/local.aspx?wealocations=wc:USSD0226 (last accessed on Oct. 18, 2006).
42 See Joint Supplement at 4-5.
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
6
services throughout these market areas.43
8. We also find that the partial grant of the instant requests, conditioned on the timely
completion of each phase of the three-phased build-out plans, promotes one of the Commission’s primary 
policy objectives—the widespread provision of communications services44—as well as the Commission’s 
goal to develop wide-area PCS services in rural and other under-served areas.45 It also promotes statutory 
objectives, namely “the development and rapid deployment of new technologies, products, and services 
for the benefit of the public, including those residing in rural areas.”46 For example, Airwave and GW 
will provide advanced wireless services throughout the Huron and Mitchell BTAs, which as explained 
above, are some of the most rural market areas in the United States.  Indeed, in Phase III, coverage will 
include many communities that have populations of less than 200 people.  They will also provide service 
to several “extremely rural areas” that lie between these sparsely populated communities.47 Further, this 
action comports with the Commission’s goal to promote the deployment of wireless telecommunications 
services to tribal lands that have little or no access to such services.48 Airwave will provide 1xRTT 
service in Phase III to the Crow Creek Indian Reservation in the Fort Thompson area, where there is 
“only spotty coverage from towers located outside the reservation.”49 It will also serve the Lower Brule 
Indian Reservation, which also lacks reliable wireless service.50 Similarly, GW will provide service to the 
Lower Brule Indian Reservation and to portions of the Rosebud Indian Reservation.51 Thus, an extension 
of the construction deadline and full implementation of the build-out proposals will promote several 
Commission and statutory goals by making advanced wireless services available to extremely rural 
areas—some of which have limited or no access to reliable wireless communications—including tribal 
lands and communities with less than 200 residents.  In light of these public interest benefits as well as 
the uniquely rural nature of the Huron and Mitchell market areas, we find that an extension of the 
construction deadline in this case is warranted.  
9. For the reasons stated above, we partially grant the captioned requests for waiver and 
extend the five-year construction deadline for the licenses until June 30, 2009, at which time Airwave and 
GW must show that they are in compliance with the construction requirements in section 24.203.52  
  
43 See Airwave Supplement at 6; GW Supplement at 7.  Airwave and GW state that they will “provide a 1xRTT 
solution with reliable signal coverage, and eventually add EV-DO to a majority of the sites.”  Airwave Supplement 
at 6; GW Supplement at 7.
44 See Rural R&O and FNPRM, 19 FCC Rcd at 19145 ¶ 130.  See also Facilitating the Provision of Spectrum-Based 
Services to Rural Areas and promoting Opportunities for Rural Telephone Companies to Provide Spectrum-Based 
Services, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 18 FCC Rcd 20802, 20807-08 ¶ 8 (2003) (“it is an especially important 
Commission goal to facilitate access to service broadly, not just in urban markets but also in rural areas, to enable 
Americans who travel, reside or conduct business throughout the country to communicate effectively for the benefit 
of the general public interest.” Id.).
45 See Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, Memorandum 
Opinion and Order, 9 FCC Rcd 4957, 5018-20 ¶¶ 154-158 (1994).
46 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(3)(A); see 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 157.
47 Joint Supplement at 5; see Airwave Supplement at 5-7; GW Supplement at 5-6.
48 See, e.g., Extending Wireless Telecommunications Services to Tribal Lands, Report and Order and Further 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 15 FCC Rcd 11794, 11799 ¶ 14 (2000).
49 Airwave Supplement at 7.
50 See id.
51 GW Supplement at 7.
52 While Airwave and GW contend that the completion of Phase I will constitute substantial service sufficient to 
meet the five-year benchmark under section 24.203 of the Commission’s rules, we do not agree that completion of 
(continued....)
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
7
Because of the critical role that the three-phased build-out proposals have played in our decision today, 
we condition the relief granted in this Order on the timely completion of each phase of the plans in 
substantially the same manner as proposed by the parties and set forth in Appendix A.53 As a result, we 
require Airwave and GW to report the completion of each phase of their plans no later than fifteen days 
after the end of each phase.54 Failure by a licensee to meet the benchmarks or to timely file the 
construction notifications would invalidate the waivers granted today for that licensee.  In that case, the 
license(s) will have automatically terminated as of the June 30, 2004 construction deadline.55
10. Finally, as with other construction extension requests, we extend the restrictions on 
broadband PCS C-block licenses that are linked to the completion of the five-year construction 
requirement.  Specifically, under section 24.839(a) of the Commission’s rules, applications for 
assignment or transfer of control will not be granted unless certain conditions are met, including that the 
application may not be filed sooner than five years after the date of the initial license grant or following 
the licensee’s notification to the Commission that its five-year construction requirement has been 
satisfied.56 Moreover, section 1.2111 of the Commission’s rules requires unjust enrichment payments 
when C-block licenses are transferred or assigned prior to five years from the date of initial license 
grant.57 These restrictions were intended to coincide with the completion of the five-year construction 
requirement for broadband PCS licensees.58 Therefore, because we extend the five-year construction 
deadline for Airwave’s two C-block licenses, we likewise extend the prohibition of section 24.839 against 
the transfer of control or assignment of those licenses to non-eligible entities, and the unjust enrichment 
payment requirements of section 1.2111, for the period of the extension, or until Airwave has satisfied the 
five-year construction requirement for those licenses.
III. ORDERING CLAUSE
11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as 
amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.925 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. 
§§ 0.331, 1.925, that the request for waiver of the construction requirements for broadband PCS licenses 
filed by Airwave Wireless, L.L.C. on June 9, 2004, and amended on June 18, 2004, June 17, 2005, and 
amended again on July 29, 2005, IS HEREBY GRANTED to the extent described herein.
  
(...continued from previous page)
Phase I is sufficient to meet the substantial service requirement.  See Airwave Supplement at 4-5; see also GW 
Supplement at 4.  To satisfy the Commission’s substantial service standard, PCS licensees must provide service that 
is “sound, favorable, and substantially above a level of mediocre service which just might minimally warrant 
renewal.”  47 C.F.R. § 24.203(d).  Therefore we are allowing until June 2009 for these parties to progress towards 
full implementation of their deployment plans.  
53 Thus, for example, the parties have 90 days from the date of this order to complete Phase I. See Attachment A.
54 The parties must each file a Notification of Construction for each phase of their respective plans.
55 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.955(a)(2).  We also note that Airwave and GW only seek a waiver or extension of the five-year 
construction deadline, and that this Order does not modify the ten-year construction requirements for the licenses.  
Therefore, at their respective ten-year benchmarks, the licensees must file appropriate renewal applications and 
construction notifications. 
56 47 C.F.R. § 24.839(a).
57 47 C.F.R. § 1.2111.
58 See Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Regarding Installment Financing for Personal Communications 
Services (PCS) Licensees, WT Docket No. 97-82, Sixth Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 15 FCC 
Rcd 16266, 16290-91 (2000).
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
8
12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as 
amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and by section 0.331 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.331, that the 
requirements of sections 1.2111 and 24.839 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.2111, 24.839, be 
extended for the C-block licenses held by Airwave Wireless, L.L.C. as described herein.
13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as 
amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and sections 0.331 and 1.925 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. 
§§ 0.331, 1.925, that the request for waiver of the construction requirements for broadband PCS licenses 
filed by GW Wireless, Inc. on June 9, 2004, amended on June 23, 2005, and amended again on July 29, 
2005, IS HEREBY GRANTED to the extent described herein.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Thomas Derenge
Deputy Chief, Mobility Division
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
i
Attachment A
Airwave Wireless
BTA 301 -- Mitchell, South Dakota
Phase I
§ to be completed by April 30, 2007
§ construction notification due by May 15, 2007
Community: Population:
Mitchell 13,798
Kimball 745
Phase II
§ to be completed by April 30, 2008
§ construction notification due by May 15, 2008
Community: Population:
Chamberlain 2,338
Begin coverage
of I-90 N/A
(new 5-year construction deadline and license expiration: June  30, 2009)
Phase III
§ to be completed by April 30, 2010
§ construction notification due by May 15, 2010
Community: Population:
Alexandria 563
Armour 782
Ethan 330
Kimball 745
Mt. Vernon 477
Parkston 1,674
Plankinton 601
Platte 1,367
Pukwana 287
Tripp 711
White Lake 405
Woonsocket 720
Complete coverage 
over I-90 N/A
Areas between the Phase III counties:
Community: Population:
Academy 15
Aurora County 
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
ii
between White Lake 
and Plankington N/A 
Hanson County 
between Alexandria 
and Mitchell N/A
Stickney 334
West River 
along I-90 N/A
Complete coverage over I-90
Airwave Wireless
BTA 199 --Huron, South Dakota
Phase I 
§ to be completed by April 30, 2007
§ construction notification due by May 15, 2007
Community: Population:
Huron 12,448
Phase II
§ to be completed by April 30, 2008
§ construction notification due by May 15, 2008
Community: Population:
Pierre 13,876
Miller 1,530
(new 5-year construction deadline and license expiration: June  30, 2009)
Phase III
§ to be completed by April 30, 2010
§ construction notification due by May 15, 2010
Community: Population:
Gann Valley 130
Highmore 851
Onida 740
Wessington 248
Areas between the Phase III counties:
Community: Population:
Blunt 370
South of Miller N/A
North of Fort 
Thompson N/A
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
iii
GW Wireless
BTA 301 -- Mitchell, South Dakota
Phase I
§ to be completed by April 30, 2007
§ construction notification due by May 15, 2007
Community: Population:
Mitchell 13,798
Phase II
§ to be completed by April 30, 2008
§ construction notification due by May 15, 2008
Community: Population:
Kennebec 284
Murdo 679
Presho 654
Reliance 169
Vivian 143
begin coverage 
of I-90 N/A
(new 5-year construction deadline and license expiration: June  30, 2009)
Phase III
§ to be completed by April 30, 2010
§ construction notification due by May 15, 2010
Community: Population:
Avon 576
Bonesteel 297
Burke 756
Carter 52
Colome 309
Dallas 142
Dixon 159
Draper 123
Fairfax 144
Freeman 1,293
Gregory 1,384
Hamill 40
Herrick 139
Ideal 208
Iona 107
Lower Brule 655
Mission 730
Mosher 27
New Witten 87
Okaton 64
Federal Communications Commission DA 07-323
iv
Okreek 170
Olivet 74
Rosebud 1,538
Scotland 968
Springfield 834
White River 595
Winner 3,354
Wood 73
Complete coverage 
over I-90 N/A
Areas between the Phase III counties:
Community: Population:
Academy 15
Aurora County 
between White Lake 
and Plankington N/A 
Hanson County 
between Alexandria 
and Mitchell N/A
Stickney 334
West River 
along I-90 N/A