Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
DA 07-3992
September 21, 2007
JD Simpson
ATCONTACT COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
2539 N Highway 67
Sedalia, CO  80135
Re:  Call Sign E040025
 File No. SES-MOD-20070831-01189
 File No. SES-STA-20070831-01190
Dear Mr. Simpson:
On August 31, 2007, ATCONTACT COMMUNICATIONS, LLC (ATCONTACT) filed an 
application to modify the license for the above-captioned Ku-Band1 VSAT Network.  The 
application seeks to add additional remote antennas to the authorization.  ATCONTACT also 
filed an STA request to operate the additional antennas prior to action on the modification
application.  For the reasons discussed below, we dismiss both the modification application and 
STA request as defective without prejudice to refiling.2
Section 25.112 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112, requires the Commission to return, 
as unacceptable for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete, contains 
internal inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission's rules.  
ATCONTACT’S application is incomplete, rendering it unacceptable and subject to dismissal.  
ATCONTACT did not provide responses to Questions E28-E60 of Schedule B regarding specific 
frequency bands, antenna polarization, antenna size, transmit and receive antenna gains, emission 
designators, maximum EIRP per carrier, maximum EIRP density per carrier, total input power at 
antenna flange, total EIRP for all carriers, modulation and services, elevation and azimuth angles, 
satellite arc, and maximum EIRP density toward the horizon.  
In addition, Question 28 of Form 312 requires applicants to submit a radiation hazard study as an 
exhibit for new transmitting facilities such as the one proposed.3 ATCONTACT’s application did 
not include this required exhibit.
  
1 11.7-12.2 and 14.0-14.5 GHz bands.
2 If ATCONTACT refiles an application identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of supplying 
the corrected information, it need not pay an application fee.  See 47 C.F.R. § 1.109(d).
3  See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(b).
 Federal Communications Commission                  DA 07-3992
2
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. 
§25.112(a)(1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission’s rules on delegations of authority, 47 
C.F.R. §0.261, we dismiss ATCONTACT’s applications as incomplete without prejudice to 
refiling.  We urge ATCONTACT to ensure the accuracy and completeness of its representations 
to the Commission in any refiling.
Sincerely,
Scott A. Kotler
Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
Satellite Division
International Bureau
cc:  James M. Talens 
Counsel for ATCONTACT Communications, Inc.