Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
DA 08-1068
May 5, 2008
Mr. Robert W. Swanson
Vizada, Inc.
1101 Wootton Parkway, 10th Floor
Rockville, MD 20852
Re: Call Sign KA313
File No. SES-MOD-20080310-00256
Dear Mr. Swanson:
On March 10, 2008, Vizada, Inc. (Vizada) filed the above-captioned application to modify its Ku-Band1
Earth Station on board Vessel (ESV) license to add up to 400 new 1.5 meter antennas2 and add new 
emissions.  Pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a)(1), we 
dismiss without prejudice to refiling the portion of the application that seeks to use the 1M43G1W and 
2M35G1W emissions.
Section 25.112 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112, requires the Commission to return, as 
unacceptable for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete, contains internal 
inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission’s rules.  A portion of Vizada’s 
application is internally inconsistent, which renders it unacceptable and subject to dismissal.  The 
deficiency is as follows:
In response to item E48 of Schedule B, Vizada lists the maximum EIRP per carrier for emission 
1M43G1W as 55.0 dBW and for emission 2M35G1W as 57.2 dBW.  These values are higher than, and 
therefore inconsistent with, the 52.0 dBW Total EIRP for all carriers listed in response to item E40 of 
Schedule B.  Given these inconsistencies, we cannot determine the proposed emission power for 
emissions 1M43G1W and 2M35G1W.  Thus, the portion of Vizada’s application seeking to use the 
1M43G1W and 2M35G1W emissions in the 14.0-14.5 GHz band is defective.  
  
1 10.95-11.2, 11.45-12.2, 14.0-14.5 GHz frequency bands.
2 SeaTel Model 6006.
 Federal Communications Commission                  DA 08-1068 
2
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §25.112(a)(1), and 
Section 0.261 of the Commission’s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. §0.261, we dismiss the 
application to the extent above without prejudice to refiling.3
Sincerely,
Scott A. Kotler
Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
Satellite Division
International Bureau
  
3 If Vizada refiles an application identical to the portion dismissed, with the exception of supplying the 
corrected information, it need not pay an application fee.  See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1109(d).