Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
August 25, 2009
DA 09-1874
James A. Stenger, Esq.
Chadbourne & Parke LLP
1200 New Hampshire Ave N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
Dear Mr. Stenger:
On January 29, 2007, Communications Ventures, Inc. (CVI) filed an application to 
transfer control of CVI from Multi-Micro, Inc. (Multi-Micro) to Arizona Broadband, LLC 
(Arizona Broadband).1 On February 20, 2007, Ohio Valley Wireless, Ltd. (Ohio Valley) filed a 
petition to deny that application.2 For the reasons stated below, we dismiss the petition and all 
responsive pleadings as moot. 
On February 10, 2009, the Application was withdrawn.3 Furthermore, even before the 
Application was withdrawn, the parties had agreed that the issues raised by the Petition were 
moot.  Ohio Valley asked that conditions be placed upon the grant of the application.4 In 
response, CVI, Multi-Micro, and Arizona Broadband consent to Ohio Valley’s requested 
commitments.5 They ask that the Petition be dismissed as moot.6 In its reply, Ohio Valley 
represents that it “is fully satisfied with the commitments made in the Opposition and there is no 
part of the Petition that has not been rendered moot by the Opposition.”7
Section 1.939(g) of the Commission’s Rules provides that the Commission may dismiss a 
petition to deny if “the issues raised become moot . . .”8 In light of the fact that the Application 
has been withdrawn and all parties now agree that the issues raised in the Petition are moot, we 
will dismiss the Petition as moot.
  
1 File No. 0002890589 (Application).
2 Petition to Deny, Ohio Valley Wireless, Ltd. (filed Feb. 20, 2007) (Petition).
3 Public notice of the withdrawal of the Application was given on February 18, 2009.  See Wireless 
Telecommunications Bureau Assignment of License Authorization Applications, Transfer of Control of Licensee 
Applications, De Facto Transfer Lease Applications And Spectrum Manager Lease Notifications, Designated Entity 
Reportable Eligibility Event Applications, and Designated Entity Annual Reports Action, Public Notice, Report No. 
4739 (WTB Feb. 18, 2009) at 1.
4 Petition at 3.
5 Joint Opposition of Communications Ventures, Inc., Multi-Micro, Inc. and Arizona Broadband LLC to the Petition 
to Deny Filed by Ohio Valley Wireless, Ltd. (filed Mar. 5, 2007) at 3.
6 Id. at 4.
7 Response to Opposition to Petition to Deny (filed Mar. 6, 2007) at 1.
8 47 C.F.R. § 1.939(g).
James A. Stenger, Esq.  2
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 309 of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 309, and Section 1.939(g) of the 
Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.939(g), that the Petition to Deny filed by Ohio Valley 
Wireless, Ltd. on February 20, 2007, as well as all responsive pleadings, ARE DISMISSED AS 
MOOT.  
This actions are taken under delegated authority pursuant to Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of 
the Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.131, 0.331.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
John J. Schauble 
Deputy Chief, Broadband Division
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
cc : Michele C. Farqhuar, Esq.
Hogan & Hartson LLP
555 13th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Scott Ritchie
Multi-Micro, Inc.
1010 West University Drive, Suite 4
Mesa, AZ 85201
Dale E. Kipp
Communications Ventures, Inc.
1010 West University Drive, Suite 4
Mesa, AZ 85201