Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1983 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 APCC Services, Inc., ) ) Complainant, ) ) v. ) File No. EB-09-MD-002 ) True LD, LLC, ) West Star Telecommunications, LLC, and ) Global Access LD, LLC, a/k/a Global Access ) Telecom, a/k/a Global Access, Inc., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL Adopted: August 31, 2009 Released: September 2, 2009 By the Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On February 9, 2009, APCC Services, Inc. (“APCC”) filed a formal complaint1 against True LD, LLC, West Star Telecommunications, LLC, and Global Access LD, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) pursuant to section 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (“Act”).2 In its Complaint, APCC alleged that Defendants violated sections 201(b) and 276(b) of the Act by failing to pay dial-around compensation owed to certain pay phone providers and failing to meet certain other requirements.3 2. After a number of extensions of time,4 on August 27, 2009, APCC filed a Motion to Withdraw Formal Complaint with prejudice, stating that the parties have resolved their dispute.5 Defendants consent to the Motion. We are satisfied that dismissing the Complaint with 1 Formal Complaint, File No. EB-09-MD-002 (filed Feb. 9, 2009) (“Complaint”). 2 47 U.S.C. § 208. 3 Complaint at 2, 10-12, 18-20; 47 U.S.C. §§ 201(b) and 226(b). 4 Letter Rulings Granting Extension of Time, File No. EB-09-MD-002 (released March 4, 2009; April 30, 2009; May 22, 2009; June 4, 2009; June 19, 2009; and July 6, 2009) (granting consent motions extending time for filing answer). 5 Motion to Withdraw Formal Complaint, File No. EB-09-MD-002 (filed Aug. 27, 2009) (“Motion”). Federal Communications Commission DA 09-1983 2 prejudice will serve the public interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes, and by eliminating the need for further litigation and the expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and this Commission. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 208, sections 1.720- 1.736 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.720-1.736, and the authority delegated in section 0.111 and 0.311 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111 and 0.311, that the Complaint IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and that this proceeding IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Alexander P. Starr Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division Enforcement Bureau