Federal Communications Commission DA 10-1843
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C.  20554
In the Matter of
Oneida County Rural Telephone Co.
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
)
)
)
)
)
)
File No. EB-06-TC-3411
NAL/Acct. No. 200732170023
FRN: 0004337218
ORDER
Adopted: September 30, 2010 Released:  October 1, 2010  
By the Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau:
1. In this Order, which follows upon our Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture 
(“NAL”),1 we determine that no forfeiture penalty should be imposed on Oneida County Rural Telephone 
Co. (“Oneida”).
2. On March 29, 2007, the Enforcement Bureau issued an NAL in the amount of $100,000 
to Oneida for its apparent violation of the Commission’s rules by failing to prepare and maintain a CPNI 
certification that complies with section 64.2009(e).2 Consistent with section 503(b)(4) of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, Oneida was granted an opportunity to show, in writing, why 
no such forfeiture should be imposed.   
3. In response to the NAL, Oneida provided evidence that it was in compliance with the 
Commission’s CPNI rules.  Accordingly, we find that no forfeiture should be imposed.   
4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.80(f)(4) of the Commission’s 
rules, the proposed forfeiture in the NAL WILL NOT BE IMPOSED.  
5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First Class Mail 
and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Oneida County Rural Telephone Co. to its address of 
record.  
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Kimberly A. Wild
Assistant Division Chief
Telecommunications Consumers Division 
Enforcement Bureau
  
1 In the Matter of Oneida County Rural Telephone Co., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 
5521 (2007) (“NAL”).
2 Id.