Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1497 
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Annual CPNI Certification
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
)
)
)
)
)
)
File No.: See Appendix
NAL/Acct. No.: See Appendix
FRN: See Appendix
Order
Adopted:  September 1, 2011 Released:  September 1, 2011
By the Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau:
1. In this Order, which follows upon our Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture 
(“Omnibus NAL”),1 we determine that no forfeiture penalties should be imposed on the companies listed 
in the Appendix.
2. In the Omnibus NAL, we found several hundred companies apparently liable for 
forfeitures in the amount of $20,000 each for violating section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, 
as amended (the “Act”),2 section 64.2009(e) of the Commission’s rules,3 and the Commission’s EPIC 
CPNI Order4 because it appeared they had not filed a timely CPNI compliance certification for calendar 
year 2007.  Consistent with section 503(b)(4) of the Act, each of these companies was granted an 
opportunity to show, in writing, why no such forfeiture should be imposed.
3. Upon review of the record, and based upon additional information provided by the 
companies, we agree that no forfeiture penalties should be imposed on each of the companies listed in the 
Appendix.  
4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.80(f)(4) of the Commission’s 
rules, the proposed forfeiture issued to the companies in the attached Appendix WILL NOT BE 
IMPOSED.  
  
1 Annual CPNI Certification, Omnibus Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 24 FCC Rcd 2299 (Enf. Bur. 
2009) (“Omnibus NAL”).
2 47 U.S.C. § 222.
3 47 C.F.R. § 64.2009(e).
4 Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications Carriers’ Use of Customer 
Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information; IP-Enabled Services, CC Docket No. 96-115, 
WC Docket No. 04-36, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 6927, 6953 
(2007) (“EPIC CPNI Order”); aff’d sub nom. Nat’l Cable & Telecom. Assoc. v. FCC, 555 F.3d 996 (D.C. Cir. 
2009).
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1497 
2
5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First Class Mail 
and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to each of the companies in the attached Appendix.  
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Richard A. Hindman
Chief
Telecommunications Consumers Division
Enforcement Bureau
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1497 
3
APPENDIX
Company name and 
address
EB File No. NAL No. FRN
Gatevox Communications, 
Inc.
Attorney of record: 
Maldonado Law Group                     
3399 NW 72nd Avenue, 
Suite 216,                
Miami, FL 33122    
EB-08-TC-3961 200932170407 0016490773
Satteline Communications, 
Corp.
Attn.: Simon Kraus, CEO                          
161 Rte. 59        
201 Monsey, NY 10952
EB-08-TC-5303 200932170730 0016728214
TCS Telecom, Inc.
Attorney of record:  
Miguel A. Huerta                   
Smith Trostle LLP        
707 West Ave.,  Ste. 202               
Austin, TX 78701
EB-08-TC-5508 200932170784 0009930827
Ultra Com, Inc.
Attn.: Dennis H. Marchuk, 
President                           
899 Wedgewood DR.  
Crystal Lake, IL 60014                                 
EB-08-TC-5809 200932170854 0004263307