Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1710 
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Blue Casa Communications, Inc. d/b/a Blue Casa 
Communications, LLC
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
File Nos. EB-08-TC-3089, EB-07-TC-5001
NAL/Acct. Nos. 200932170239, 
200832170014
FRN: 0009051731
ORDER
Adopted:  October 13, 2011 Released:  October 14, 2011
By the Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau:
1. In this Order, which follows upon our Omnibus Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture 
(Omnibus NAL),1 as well our Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture of February 18, 2008,2 we 
determine that no forfeiture penalty should be imposed on Blue Casa Communications, Inc. d/b/a Blue Casa 
Communications, LLC (Blue Casa or Company).
2. In the Omnibus NAL, we found Blue Casa apparently liable for a forfeiture for violating 
section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Communications Act or Act),3 section 
64.2009(e) of the Commission’s rules,4 and the Commission’s EPIC CPNI Order,5 because it appeared that 
the Company had not filed a timely CPNI compliance certification for calendar year 2007.  Consistent with 
section 503(b)(4) of the Act, Blue Casa was granted an opportunity to show, in writing, why no such 
forfeiture should be imposed.
3. In the Feb. 18, 2008 NAL, we found that Blue Casa apparently violated section 1.717 of the 
Commission’s rules6 by failing to respond to two informal complaints served on Blue Casa by the 
Consumers and Governmental Affairs Bureau (CGB).7 Consistent with section 503(b)(4) of the Act, Blue 
Casa was granted an opportunity to show, in writing, why no such forfeiture should be imposed.
  
1 Annual CPNI Certification, Omnibus Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 24 FCC Rcd 2299 (2009) 
(Omnibus NAL).
2 Blue Casa Communications, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 23 FCC Rcd 2667 (2008) (Feb. 18, 
2008 NAL).
3 47 U.S.C. § 222.
4 47 C.F.R. § 64.2009(e).
5 Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications Carriers’ Use of Customer 
Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information; IP-Enabled Services, CC Docket No. 96-
115;WC Docket No. 04-36, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 6927, 6953 
(2007) (EPIC CPNI Order); aff’d sub nom. Nat’l Cable & Telecom. Assoc. v. FCC, 555 F.3d 996 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
47 C.F.R. § 1.717.
7 Feb. 18, 2008 NAL, 23 FCC Rcd at 2667, para. 1.
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-1710 
2
4. Upon review of the record, and based upon additional information provided by Blue 
Casa, we agree that no forfeiture penalties should be imposed on Blue Casa.  
5. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.80(f)(4) of the Commission’s 
rules, the proposed forfeitures issued to Blue Casa Communications, Inc. WILL NOT BE IMPOSED.  
6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First Class Mail 
and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to Katherine Barker Marshall, Attorney, Arent Fox LLP, 
Attorneys at Law, 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036-5339.  
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Richard A. Hindman
Chief
Telecommunications Consumers Division
Enforcement Bureau