Federal Communications Commission DA 11-523
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Access.1 New Jersey License Company, LLC
Licensee of Station WMGM-TV, 
Wildwood, New Jersey
)
)
)
)
)
)
File Number: EB-06-IH-3725
Facility ID Number:  61111
NAL/Acct. Number:  201132080024  
FRN:  0009510595
NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE 
Adopted:  March 24, 2011 Released:  March 24, 2011
By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:
I. INTRODUCTION
1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (“NAL”), we assess a monetary 
forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) against Access.1 New Jersey License 
Company, LLC (“Access.1” or “the Licensee”), licensee of Station WMGM-TV, Wildwood, New Jersey 
(“Station WMGM-TV” or “the Station”), for its apparent willful violation of section 317 of the 
Communications Act, as amended (“the Act”), and section 73.1212 of the Commission’s rules.1 As 
discussed below, we find that Access.1 apparently violated section 317 of the Act and the Commission’s 
sponsorship identification rule.
II. BACKGROUND
2. The Commission received a complaint jointly filed by Free Press and the Center for 
Media and Democracy (“CMD”) alleging that Access.1’s Station WMGM-TV had aired a Video News 
Release (“VNR”) produced for Matrixx Initiatives, the makers of Zicam cold remedy, without also airing 
a sponsorship identification announcement.2 The Enforcement Bureau (“Bureau”) issued a letter of 
inquiry to the Licensee concerning the allegations raised in the Complaint.3
3. Access.1 responded to the LOI and stated that Station WMGM-TV aired an edited 
version of the Matrixx Initiatives Zicam VNR on October 18, 2006 during the “Lifeline” health segment 
  
1 See 47 U.S.C. § 317(a)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 73.1212.  
2 See Complaint of Timothy Karr, Campaign Director, Free Press, and Diane Farsetta, Senior Researcher, Center for 
Media and Democracy, dated November 14, 2006 (“Complaint”).
3 See Letter from Hillary S. DeNigro, Chief, Investigations & Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, to Access.1 
New Jersey License Company, dated April 26, 2007 (“LOI”). 
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-523
2
that appears on the Station once a week.4 Access.1 further stated that it had received the VNR from D S 
Simon Productions.5
4. Access.1 provided a recording and transcript of the broadcast at issue.6 Before a 
commercial break, Station WMGM-TV’s anchor previewed upcoming segments, and stated:  “And we 
will show you how to treat the common cold, especially when you are traveling.”7 Following the break, 
the Station’s anchor introduced the VNR as follows:  “Health reporter Robin Stoloff joins us tonight to 
tell us how to take care of a common medical ailment.”  The transcript, in its entirety, is as follows:8
[Reporter]  A national survey by Harris Interactive, shows only nine percent of travelers over the 
age of thirty say they feel very knowledgeable about how to treat the common cold.  This is 
especially important as we begin the cold and flu season and one of the biggest travel times of the 
year.
[Voiceover]  Nearly two-thirds of U.S. travelers [thirty] and over say they are somewhat or not at 
all knowledgeable about treating the common cold, according to the new Zicam Travel Well 
Survey conducted by Harris Interactive.  Yet [two] out of [five] travelers surveyed say colds have 
negatively impacted their trips.
Allison Janse wrote Germ Freak’s Guide to Outwitting Colds & Flu, she says being a mother of 
premature twins made her start researching how to avoid germs.
[Caption:  Allison Janse, Author]  You can do everything I say in my book.  You can eat right, 
exercise, walk around in a bubble suit.  But, eventually, you’re gonna get sick.  And in m[y] 
research, I found that homeopathic zinc products can shorten the duration of your illness.
[Voiceover]  Travelers are at [an] increased risk of getting sick because of things like greater 
exposure to viruses, stress and other variables.  The survey showed [four] in [five] of the U.S. 
travelers surveyed believe the worst time to catch the common cold is while traveling.
Dr. Mark Siegel of New York University says that obtaining relief is possible, but that it’s 
important to begin treatment as soon as symptoms occur.
[Caption:  Dr. Marc Siegel, New York University] There is no cure for the common cold.  But 
there are some things you can do to get better. Especially in the first 48 hours.  You can take an 
intranasal zinc preparation, like Zicam.  To cut down on the severity and duration of symptoms.  
You can also take a decongestant.  Get more rest.  Drink some chicken soup.  And sleep.
[Voiceover]  Nearly [ninety] percent of the U[.]S[.] travelers survey [sic] say reducing the 
duration of the common cold would be important or very important for treating the common cold, 
  
4 See Letter from James L. Winston, Esquire, Rubin, Winston, Diercks, Harris & Cooke, L.L.P., counsel for 
Access.1 New Jersey License Company LLC, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications 
Commission, dated June 20, 2007, at 2-3, 4 & Exh. 4 (“LOI Response”).       
5 See id. at 2 & Exh. 4.
6 See id. at Exhs. 7-8. 
7 See id. at Exh. 8. 
8 Bracketed text within the block quote reflects minor, non-substantive edits.
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-523
3
but only [thirty-three] percent of those travelers who typically use over-the-counter medications 
to treat the common cold, have used a zinc cold remedy.
[Allison Janse] I think the survey showed me that people really need help figuring out how to 
treat a common cold when they’re on the go. For instance, most people don’t know that zinc 
products are available to help them.  I mean, yes, we’d like to avoid all germs and never get sick, 
but that’s not gonna happen. If you do get sick, there are things you can do to fight back.
[Reporter]  To see this report again or to find out more about zinc as a treatment for the common 
cold, go to our website, [www.nbc40.net], click on Health and then [go to] Lifeline.9
5. The recording of the broadcast showed approximately four different shots of the Zicam 
product mentioned in the script as well as a shot of the cover of the Zicam Travel Well Survey.  No other 
zinc cold remedies or products for treating the common cold were shown.10 The broadcast featured a 
physician, who specifically recommended the use of Zicam, but no other name brand cold remedy, during 
the first forty-eight hours of a cold to alleviate the severity and duration of symptoms.  Although use of a 
decongestant was mentioned as a treatment, no specific decongestant products were named or shown.11
6. In its LOI Response, Access.1 stated that the Station announced that the “Lifeline” 
segment was sponsored by Shore Memorial Hospital, and further stated that “neither Shore Memorial 
Hospital, nor anyone associated with Shore Memorial Hospital, was involved in the production or 
delivery of the VNR material to the Station.”12 Access.1 argued that no additional sponsorship 
identification announcement was required for the inclusion of the VNR material in the Station’s October 
18, 2006 “Lifeline” report.13 Specifically, Access.1 stated that because the Station and its employees 
received no consideration for broadcasting the VNR material and no report that would have required the 
Station to provide a sponsorship identification announcement, no additional sponsorship identification 
announcement was required.14 The Licensee asserts that its conduct was consistent with guidance in the 
Commission’s 2005 Public Notice concerning the use of VNR material.15
  
9 See id. at Exh. 7.
10 See id. at Exh. 8.
11 See id.  
12 See id. at 4 & Exh. 1.  See also id. at Exh. 8 (prior to the “Lifeline” report, the Station aired a full screen depiction 
of the Shore Memorial Hospital’s logo, below the caption “Sponsored By” and audio accompanying this material 
stated:  “’Lifeline’ with Robin Stoloff brought to you by Shore Memorial Hospital, dedicated to embracing your 
tomorrows”).
13 See id. at 4-7.
14 See id at 4-5, 7 & Exhs. 1-4.  
15 See id. at 8 (citing Commission Reminds Broadcast Licensees, Cable Operators and Others of Requirements 
Applicable to Video News Releases and Seeks Comment on the Use of Video New Releases by Broadcast Licensees 
and Cable Operators, Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd 8593 (2005) (“2005 Public Notice”)).
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-523
4
III. DISCUSSION 
A. Sponsorship Identification Laws
7. Section 317(a)(1) of the Act and section 73.1212(a) of the Commission’s rules require 
broadcast stations to broadcast an announcement disclosing whenever any matter is broadcast in exchange 
for valuable consideration “directly or indirectly paid or promised to or charged or accepted by, the 
station so broadcasting” at the time the material is aired.16 Specifically, section 317(a)(1) provides:
All matter broadcast by any radio station for which any money, service or other              
valuable consideration is directly or indirectly paid, or promised to or charged or                
accepted by, the station so broadcasting, from any person, shall, at the time the same                     
is so broadcast, be announced as paid for or furnished, as the case may be, by such  
person:  Provided, That “service or other valuable consideration” shall not include any 
service or property furnished without charge or at nominal charge for use on, or in 
connection with, a broadcast unless it is so furnished in consideration for an identification 
in a broadcast of any person, product, service, trademark, or brand name beyond an 
identification which is reasonably related to the use of such service or property on the 
broadcast.17
Section 73.1212(a) of the Commission’s rules, which implements section 317(a)(1) of the Act, further 
provides:
When a broadcast station transmits any matter for which money, service, or other 
valuable consideration is either directly or indirectly paid or promised to, or charged or 
accepted by such station, the station, at the time of the broadcast, shall announce:                
(1) That such matter is sponsored, paid for, or furnished, either in whole or in part, and
(2) By whom or on whose behalf such consideration was supplied:  Provided, however, 
That “service or other valuable consideration” shall not include any service or 
property furnished without or at a nominal charge for use on, or in connection with, a 
broadcast unless it is so furnished in consideration for an identification of any person, 
product, service, trademark, or brand name beyond an identification reasonably 
related to the use of such service or property on the broadcast.18  
8. The Commission has explained that the sponsorship identification rules are “grounded in 
the principle that listeners and viewers are entitled to know who seeks to persuade them.”19 The 
disclosures required by the sponsorship identification rules provide listeners and viewers with information 
concerning the source of material in order to prevent misleading or deceiving those listeners and 
viewers.20 As set forth above, pursuant to section 317 and the Commission’s implementing rule, the 
obligation to provide such a disclosure for material “furnished without a charge or at a nominal charge for 
use on, or in connection with, a broadcast” is triggered when the use of the material falls outside of the 
  
16 47 U.S.C. § 317(a); 47 C.F.R. § 73.1212(a).  
17 47 U.S.C. § 317(a)(1).  The clause from this subsection stating, “Provided, That ‘service or other valuable 
consideration’ shall not include . . . unless . . . .” is hereinafter referred to as the “proviso.”  
18 47 C.F.R. § 73.1212(a). 
19 See, e.g., 2005 Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd at 8593-94.  
20 See Sonshine Family Television, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 18686 (2007), 
Forfeiture Order, 24 FCC Rcd 14830, 14834 ¶ 12 (2009) (forfeiture reduced and paid).  
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-523
5
proviso because it involves “an identification of any person, product service, trademark or brand name 
beyond an identification reasonably related to the use of such service or property on the broadcast.”21
9. When Congress amended section 317 in 1960 and adopted the proviso, it provided 
twenty-seven examples regarding the types of consideration that would trigger the obligation to provide 
sponsorship identification and those that would not because they fell within the proviso.22 The 
Commission included those examples plus nine more in public notices released following its adoption of 
revised sponsorship identification rules in 1963 and 1975.23 Example 26 provides as follows:
26.  (a)  A bus company prepares a scenic travel film which it furnishes free to broadcast stations.  
No mention is made in the film of the company or its buses.  No announcement is required 
because there is no payment other than the matter furnished and there is no mention of the bus 
company.
(b)  Same situation as in (a), except that the bus, clearly identifiable as that of the bus 
company which supplied the film, is shown fleetingly in highway views in a manner reasonably 
related to that travel program.  No announcement is required.
(c)  Same situation as in (a), except that the bus, clearly identifiable as that of the bus 
company which supplied the film, is shown to an extent disproportionate to the subject matter of 
the film.  An announcement is required, because in this case by the use of the film the broadcaster 
has impliedly agreed to broadcast an identification beyond that reasonably related to the subject 
matter of the film.24
We reject Access.1’s argument that no sponsorship identification announcement was required because 
Station WMGM-TV and its employees did not receive and were not promised consideration for the 
broadcast of the VNR material and because the Station and its employees did not receive a report 
pursuant to section 507 of the Act that would have required it to provide a sponsorship identification 
announcement for the VNR material aired.25  As set forth above, section 317 and the Commission’s 
sponsorship identification rules also include a proviso concerning service or property furnished without 
charge or at nominal charge for use on a broadcast, and require a sponsorship identification 
announcement if the products or services are shown to an extent that is disproportionate to the subject 
matter of the broadcast.26  As the Commission's Public Notices have made clear, the definition of 
  
21 See 47 U.S.C. § 317(a)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 73.1212(a)(2).
22 H.R. Rep. No. 1800, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1, at 12-17 (1960) (“House Report”). 
23 See In re Applicability of Sponsorship Identification Rules, Public Notice, 40 FCC 141 (1963) (“1963 Public 
Notice”).  The 1963 Public Notice was updated in 1975.  See Applicability of Sponsorship Identification Rules, 
Public Notice, 40 Fed. Reg. 41936 (1975) (“1975 Public Notice”). 
24 1975 Public Notice, 40 Fed. Reg. at 41939, Example 26; 1963 Public Notice, 40 FCC at 148, Example 26.
25 See 47 U.S.C. §§ 317(b), 508.  Section 507 establishes a reporting scheme designed to require disclosure to the 
licensee of payments to other persons for the inclusion of matter in programming.  See 47 U.S.C. § 508.  Section 
317(b) requires sponsorship identification disclosures where a licensee receives a report under section 507 “of 
circumstances that would have required an announcement had the consideration been received by the licensee.”  47 
U.S.C. § 317(b).  See also 47 C.F.R. § 73.1212(c) (implementing sponsorship identification requirements where the 
licensee receives a report pursuant to section 507).  
26 See 47 U.S.C. § 317(a)(1); 47 C.F.R. § 73.1212(a)(2).  See also supra note 23.
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-523
6
consideration is extremely broad.27 Moreover, Commission precedent makes clear that VNR material 
constitutes “valuable consideration” within the meaning of section 317 that may require a sponsorship 
identification announcement under some circumstances.28 Furthermore, the 2005 Public Notice reminded 
broadcast licensees that applicable statutory provisions and the Commission’s rules generally require 
them to clearly disclose the nature, source and sponsorship of program matter that they air, including 
VNRs.29 The Commission also has warned that it will take enforcement action against broadcast stations 
that do not comply with the disclosure responsibilities set forth in the rules.30  
B. Access.1 Failed to Provide Requisite Sponsorship Identification Analysis
10. We now consider whether Access.1 was required to provide a sponsorship identification 
announcement for the VNR material broadcast on Station WMGM-TV.  In other words, did the use of the 
VNR material fall outside of the section 317(a)(1) proviso?  As set forth above, Example 26 from the 
House Report indicates that no announcement is required for a promotional film in which the company’s 
products or services are clearly identifiable and “shown fleetingly … in a manner reasonably related” to 
the subject matter of the film, but that announcement is required if the company’s products or services are 
“shown to an extent disproportionate to the subject matter of the film.”31  
11. The subject matter of the report at issue here, based on the recording and transcript, was 
how to treat the common cold.32 Yet, the VNR focuses almost exclusively on Matrixx’s Zicam product in 
its visual depictions or verbal identifications of products, and the VNR contained extensive images of 
Zicam – a total of four different shots, some of them close-up and some of them extended.33 As stated 
above, the VNR identifies the product by name.  In addition, the VNR features a physician associated 
with New York University who specifically recommends Zicam as a remedy for treating the common 
cold, but does not mention any other cold remedies by brand name.34  
12. We conclude that the identification of Matrixx’s Zicam cold product exceeded an 
identification that was reasonably related to the subject matter of the programming at issue.35 The VNR 
  
27 See 1975 Public Notice, 40 Fed. Reg. 41936; 1963 Public Notice, 40 FCC 141.
28 See Comcast Corporation, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 17474, 17477 ¶ 8, 17478 ¶¶ 
9-10, 17479 ¶ 11 (Enf. Bur. 2007) (forfeiture paid).  See also Advertising Council Request for Declaratory Ruling or 
Waiver Concerning Sponsorship Identification Rules, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 22616 (2002) (credit towards satisfaction 
of a statutorily-mandated matching PSA obligation constituted valuable consideration for airing programming with 
government-approved anti-drug and anti-alcohol themes); Westinghouse Broadcasting Co., Inc., Letter by Direction 
of the Commission, 40 FCC 28 (1958) (furnishing of films of a Senate hearing investigating a strike against the 
Kohler Company to a television station by the National Association of Manufacturers constituted “valuable 
consideration” under section 317).  
29 See 2005 Public Notice, 20 FCC Rcd at 8593-94.
30 See id.  
31 Compare 1975 Public Notice, 40 Fed. Reg. at 41939, Example 26(b); 1963 Public Notice, 40 FCC at 148, 
Example 26(b) with 1975 Public Notice, 40 Fed. Reg. at 41939, Example 26(c); 1963 Public Notice, 40 FCC at 148, 
Example 26(c).
32 See LOI Response at Exhs. 7-8.
33 See id.
34 See id.
35 By its use of the VNR, Station WMGM-TV “impliedly agreed to broadcast an identification beyond that 
reasonably related to the subject matter of the film.”  See 1975 Public Notice, 40 Fed. Reg. at 4139, Example 26(c); 
1963 Public Notice, 40 FCC Rcd at 148, Example 26(c).  
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-523
7
material in question therefore does not fall within the scope of the proviso set forth in section 317 and 
section 73.1212(a)(2), which is directed to material that contains only “fleeting or transient” references to 
products or brand names.36 Instead, like the bus company in Example 26(c), Zicam was shown to an 
extent disproportionate to the subject matter of the report, obligating Station WMGM-TV to provide a 
sponsorship identification announcement.37  
13. Although the Station provided a sponsorship identification announcement for Shore 
Memorial Hospital, which was another sponsor of the “Lifeline” segment in which the Zicam VNR 
appeared, this sponsorship announcement did not provide information concerning Matrixx’s sponsorship 
of the VNR material.  Because the material that aired on Station WMGM-TV fell outside the proviso, the 
Station should have aired a sponsorship identification announcement to alert viewers that Matrixx was the 
source of the VNR material seeking to persuade them.  We note that the risk of viewer confusion as to the 
source of the material may have been especially great here, because the Station provided viewers with an 
identification of Shore Memorial Hospital as the sponsor of the program segment, yet the commentary by 
the physician in the segment – i.e. during the VNR – was in fact material sponsored by Matrixx, the 
maker of Zicam.  For the foregoing reasons, we find that Access.1’s airing of VNR material on Station 
WMGM-TV’s October 18, 2006 news program without providing a sponsorship identification 
announcement was an apparent violation of section 317 of the Act and section 73.1212 of the 
Commission’s rules.38  
C. Proposed Action 
14. Under section 503(b)(1) of the Act, any person who is determined by the Commission to 
have willfully or repeatedly failed to comply with any provision of the Act or any rule, regulation or order 
issued by the Commission shall be liable to the United States for a forfeiture penalty.39 Section 312(f)(1) 
of the Act defines willful as “the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of [any] act, 
irrespective of any intent to violate” the law.40 The legislative history to section 312(f)(1) of the Act 
clarifies that this definition of willful applies to both sections 312 and 503(b) of the Act,41 and the 
Commission has so interpreted the term in the section 503(b) context.42 In order to impose such a 
penalty, the Commission must issue a notice of apparent liability, the notice must be received, and the 
person against whom the notice has been issued must have an opportunity to show, in writing, why no 
such penalty should be imposed.43 The Commission will then issue a forfeiture if it finds, by a 
  
36 Comcast Corp., 22 FCC Rcd at 17477.  
37 See 47 U.S.C. § 317; 47 C.F.R. § 73.1212(a)(2).
38 Because we find that Access.1 was required to provide sponsorship identification for this material as it fell outside 
the proviso, we need not address Access.1’s arguments that no announcement was required under the provisions of 
the Act and the Commission’s rules requiring announcements in connection with broadcasts for which the 
broadcaster receives a report pursuant to section 507 of the Act.  
39 See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B); 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(1).  See also 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(D) (providing that any 
person who is determined by the Commission to have violated any provision of section 1464 shall be liable for a 
forfeiture penalty).
40 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1).
41 See H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982).
42 See, e.g., Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388 
(1991), recons. denied, 7 FCC Rcd 3454 (1992).
43 See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b); 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(f).
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-523
8
preponderance of the evidence, that the person has willfully or repeatedly violated the Act or a 
Commission rule.44  
15. The Commission’s forfeiture guidelines establish a base forfeiture amount of four 
thousand dollars ($4,000) for sponsorship identification violations.45 In addition, the Commission’s rules 
provide that base forfeitures may be adjusted based upon consideration of the factors enumerated in 
section 503(b)(2)(E) of the Act46 and section 1.80(a)(4) of the Commission’s rules, which include “the 
nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation . . . and the degree of culpability, any history of 
prior offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as justice may require.”47 Based upon our review of 
the record in this case and the statutory factors identified above, we find that Access.1 is apparently liable 
for a forfeiture in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000).
IV. ORDERING CLAUSES
16. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 503(b) of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended,48 and sections 0.111, 0.311, 0.314 and 1.80 of the 
Commission’s rules,49 that Access.1 New Jersey License Company, LLC is hereby NOTIFIED of its 
APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE in the amount of four thousand dollars ($4,000) for its 
apparent willful violation of the sponsorship announcements requirements of section 317 of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and section 73.1212 of the Commission’s rules. 
17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.80 of the Commission’s rules, that 
within fifteen (15) days of the release date of this NAL, Access.1 New Jersey License Company, LLC, 
SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking 
reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture.  
18. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument, payable to the 
order of the Federal Communications Commission.  The payment must include the NAL/Account 
Number and FRN Number referenced above.  Payment by check or money order may be mailed to
Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 979088, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000.  Payment by 
overnight mail may be sent to U.S. Bank – Government Lockbox #979088, SL-MO-C2-GL, 1005 
Convention Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101.  Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 
021030004, receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and account number 27000001.  For payment by credit card, 
an FCC Form 159 (Remittance Advice) must be submitted. When completing the FCC Form 159, enter 
the NAL/Account number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID), and enter the letters “FORF” in 
block number 24A (payment type code).  Requests for full payment under an installment plan should be 
sent to: Chief Financial Officer -- Financial Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A625, 
Washington, D.C. 20554. Please contact the Financial Operations Group Help Desk at 1-877-480-3201 
or Email: ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov with any questions regarding payment procedures.  Access.1 New 
  
44 See, e.g., SBC Communications, Inc., Forfeiture Order, 17 FCC Rcd 7589, 7591 ¶ 4 (2002) (forfeiture paid).  
45 See The Commission’s Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate 
the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17115 (1197), recons. denied, 15 FCC 303 (1999) 
(“Forfeiture Policy Statement”); 47 C.F.R. § 1.80.  
46 See 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(E).
47 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(4).
48 See 47 U.S.C. §§ 317, 503(b).  
49 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80, 73.1212.
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-523
9
Jersey License Company, LLC must also send electronic notification on the date said payment is made to 
Terry.Cavanaugh@fcc.gov, Melanie.Godschall@fcc.gov, Anjali.Singh@fcc.gov, and 
Kenneth.Scheibel@fcc.gov. 
19. The written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture, if any, 
must include a detailed factual statement supported by appropriate documentation and affidavits pursuant 
to sections 1.80(f)(3) and 1.16 of the Commission’s rules.  The written statement shall be mailed to the 
Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 
445 12th Street, S.W., Room 4-C330, Washington, D.C. 20554, and MUST INCLUDE the NAL/Account 
Number referenced above.  To the extent practicable, any response should also be sent by e-mail to 
Terry.Cavanaugh@fcc.gov, Melanie.Godschall@fcc.gov, Anjali.Singh@fcc.gov, and 
Kenneth.Scheibel@fcc.gov.   
20. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a 
claim of inability to pay unless the respondent submits:  (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-
year period; (2) financial statements prepared according to generally accepted accounting practices 
(“GAAP”); or (3) some other reliable and objective documentation that accurately reflects the 
respondent’s current financial status.  Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for 
the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted.  
21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Complaint IS GRANTED to the extent 
indicated herein and IS OTHERWISE DENIED, and the Complaint proceeding IS HEREBY 
TERMINATED.50
22. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that a copy of this NAL shall be sent, by Certified 
Mail/Return Receipt Requested, to Access.1 New Jersey License Company, LLC, at its address of record 
and to its counsel, James L. Winston, Esquire, Rubin, Winston, Diercks, Harris & Cooke, L.L.P., 1201 
Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 200, Washington, D.C.  20036.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
P. Michele Ellison
Chief
Enforcement Bureau
  
50 For purposes of the forfeiture proceeding initiated by this NAL, Access.1 New Jersey License Company LLC, 
shall be the only party to this proceeding.