Federal Communications Commission DA 11-742
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Annual CPNI Certification
Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
File No. See Appendix
NAL/Acct. No. See Appendix
FRN: See Appendix
ORDER
Adopted:  April 27, 2011 Released:  April 27, 2011
By the Chief, Telecommunications Consumers Division, Enforcement Bureau:
1. In this Order, which follows upon our Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture 
(“Omnibus NAL”),1 we determine that no forfeiture penalties should be imposed on the companies listed in 
the Appendix.
2. In the Omnibus NAL, we found several companies apparently liable for forfeitures in the 
amount of $25,000 each for repeatedly violating section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as 
amended (the “Communications Act” or “Act”),2 section 64.2009(e) of the Commission’s rules,3 and the 
Commission’s EPIC CPNI Order,4 because it appeared that they had not filed a timely CPNI compliance 
certification for calendar years 2007 and 2008.  Consistent with section 503(b)(4) of the Act, each of these 
companies was granted an opportunity to show, in writing, why no such forfeiture should be imposed.  
3. Upon review of the record, and based upon additional information provided by the 
companies, we find that no forfeiture should be imposed.  
4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.80(f)(4) of the Commission’s 
rules, the proposed forfeiture issued to the companies in the attached Appendix WILL NOT BE 
IMPOSED.
  
1 Annual CPNI Certification, Omnibus Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 25 FCC Rcd 1790 (Enf. Bur. 
2010).
2 47 U.S.C. § 222.
3 47 C.F.R. § 64.2009(e).
4 Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications Carriers’ Use of Customer
Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information; IP-Enabled Services, CC Docket No. 96-115;
WC Docket No. 04-36, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 6927, 6953
(2007) (“EPIC CPNI Order”); aff’d sub nom. Nat’l Cable & Telecom. Assoc. v. FCC, 555 F.3d (D.C. Cir. 2009).
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-742
2
5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First Class Mail 
and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to each of the companies in the attached Appendix
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Richard A. Hindman
Chief
Telecommunications Consumers Division
Enforcement Bureau
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-742
3
APPENDIX
Company name and address EB File No. NAL No. FRN
Advanza Telecom, Inc.
Attorney of record:           
Law Office of Kristopher E.                                                                                                             
Twomey, P.C.                  
1725 “I” Street, N.W.,     
Suite 300        
Washington, D.C. 20006
EB-08-TC-2890 0017029141 200932170194
G-Link Communications, Inc.
Attorney of record:       
Russell Eddins, CEO                 
4396 Baldwin  Avenue,   
Suite 30                               
Little River, SC        
EB-09-TC-102 0016937807 200932170061