Federal Communications Commission DA 11-825 
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of
Cablevision Systems Corp.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
File Numbers EB-09-SE-012, 
EB-09-SE-013, EB-09-SE-014, 
EB-09-SE-015, EB-09-SE-016
NAL/Acct. Nos. 200932100034, 
200932100035, 200932100036, 
200932100037, 200932100038
FRN 0009725276
In the Matter of
Charter Communications, Inc.
)
)
)
)
)
File Numbers EB-09-SE-007, EB-09-SE-017
NAL/Acct. Nos. 200932100029, 
200932100039
FRN 0017179383
In the Matter of
Comcast Corporation
)
)
)
)
)
)
File Numbers EB-09-SE-003, 
EB-09-SE-004, EB-09-SE-009
NAL/Acct. Nos. 200932100025, 
200932100026, 200932100031
FRN 0015401581
In the Matter of
Cox Communications, Inc.
)
)
)
)
)
File Numbers EB-09-SE-010, EB-09-SE-011
NAL/Acct. Nos. 200932100032, 
200932100033
FRN 0016034050
In the Matter of
Harron Communications, LP
)
)
)
)
File Number EB-09-SE-008
NAL/Acct. No. 200932100030
FRN 0016642761
In the Matter of
Time Warner Cable, Inc.
)
)
)
)
)
File Numbers EB-09-SE-005, EB-09-SE-006
NAL/Acct. Nos. 200932100027, 
200932100028
FRN 0016618670
ORDER
Adopted:  May 4, 2011 Released:  May 4, 2011  
By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:
1. In this Order, which follows upon a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order 
(“NAL”) issued in each of the above captioned cases on January 19, 2009,1 we determine that no 
  
1 Comcast Corporation, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 1049 (Enf. Bur. 2009); 
Comcast Corporation, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 1054 (Enf. Bur. 2009); 
Time Warner Cable, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order,  24 FCC Rcd 1059 (Enf. Bur. 
2009); Time Warner Cable, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 1064 (Enf. Bur. 
2009); Charter Communications, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 1069 
(Enf. Bur. 2009); Harron Communications, LP, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 
Federal Communications Commission DA 11-825
2
forfeiture penalties should be imposed in these cases.
2. In each NAL, we found a cable operator apparently liable for violating section 76.1603(b) of 
the Commission’s rules,2 because complaints submitted to the Commission indicated that the operator had 
not provided adequate notice of changes in rates, programming services, or channel positions to its 
subscribers.  Consistent with section 503(b)(4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,3 each of 
these companies was granted an opportunity to show, in writing, why no such forfeiture should be 
imposed.  
3. In response to the NAL, each cable operator sufficiently demonstrated that it had provided the 
advanced notice required under our rules.4 Therefore, we find that no forfeiture penalty should be 
imposed.
4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 503(b) of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.80(f)(4) of the Commission’s 
rules, the proposed forfeitures issued in the above captioned proceedings WILL NOT BE IMPOSED.5
5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent by First Class Mail and 
Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to each counsel of record in the above captioned proceedings.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
P. Michele Ellison
Chief, Enforcement Bureau
  
1074 (Enf. Bur. 2009); Comcast Corporation, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 
1079 (Enf. Bur. 2009); Cox Communications, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 24 FCC 
Rcd 1084 (Enf. Bur. 2009); Cox Communications, Inc., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 24 
FCC Rcd 1089 (Enf. Bur. 2009); Cablevision Systems Corp., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 
24 FCC Rcd 1094 (Enf. Bur. 2009); Cablevision Systems Corp., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and 
Order, 24 FCC Rcd 1099 (Enf. Bur. 2009); Cablevision Systems Corp., Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture 
and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 1104 (Enf. Bur. 2009); Cablevision Systems Corp., Notice of Apparent Liability for 
Forfeiture and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 1109 (Enf. Bur. 2009); Cablevision Systems Corp., Notice of Apparent Liability 
for Forfeiture and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 1114 (Enf. Bur. 2009); Charter Communications, Inc., Notice of Apparent 
Liability for Forfeiture and Order, 24 FCC Rcd 1119 (Enf. Bur. 2009). 
2 47 C.F.R. § 76.1603(b).
3 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(4).
4 Comcast Responses to Notice of Apparent Liability and Request for Cancellation of Proposed Forfeiture (filed 
March 20, 2009) (EB-08-SE-003, EB-08-SE-004, EB-08-SE-009); Time Warner Cable, Inc. Responses to Notices 
of Apparent Liability and Request for Cancellation of Proposed Forfeitures (filed March 20, 2009) (EB-08-SE-005, 
EB-08-SE-006); Charter Responses to Notice of Apparent Liability (filed March 20, 2009) (EB-09-SE-007, EB-09-
SE-017); Harron Communications, L.P. Response to Notice of Apparent Liability (filed March 20, 2009) (EB-09-
SE-008); Cox Statements in Response to Notice of Apparent Liability and Request for Cancellation of Proposed 
Forfeiture (filed March 20, 2009) (EB-09-SE-010, EB-08-SE-011 (newspaper notice pertaining to CSPAN2 made 
available to the public 30 days prior to migration)); Cablevision Systems Corp. Response to Notice of Apparent 
Liability (filed March 20, 2009) (EB-09-SE-012, EB-09-SE-013, EB-09-SE-014, EB-09-SE-015, EB-09-SE-016).
5 The customer refund portions of the NAL/Order in each of the above captioned cases were previously set aside.  
See Comcast Corporation, et al., Order, 24 FCC Rcd 1559 (2009).