Federal Communications Commission DA 12-1666 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Requests for Waiver and Review of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Annette Island School District Juneau, Alaska, et al. Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) File Nos. SLD-746414, et al. CC Docket No. 02-6 ORDER Adopted: October 17, 2012 Released: October 17, 2012 By the Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau: 1. Consistent with precedent,1 we grant 14 requests from petitioners2 seeking review of decisions made by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) under the E-rate program (more formally known as the schools and libraries universal service support program).3 In each case, USAC denied or reduced funding because it found that the applicant failed to timely submit its FCC Form 486. Based on the facts and circumstances of these specific cases, we find that good cause exists to grant these appeals.4 On our own motion, we also waive section 54.507(d) of the Commission’s rules, and direct USAC to waive any procedural deadlines, such as the invoicing deadline, that might be necessary 1 See Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Alaska Gateway School District, Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-412028, et al., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, 21 FCC Rcd 10182 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2006) (granting 128 appeals after finding good cause to waive the deadline for filing FCC Form 486). See also Requests for Review and Waiver of the Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Albertville City Schools, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-739495, et al., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, 27 FCC Rcd 6094 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2012) (granting 12 appeals after finding good cause to waive the deadline for filing FCC Form 486). 2 The requests for waiver and review are listed in the appendix. 3 Section 54.719(c) of the Commission’s rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of USAC may seek review from the Commission. 47 C.F.R. § 54.719(c). 4 Generally, the Commission’s rules may be waived if good cause is shown. 47 C.F.R. § 1.3. The Commission may exercise its discretion to waive a rule where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (Northeast Cellular). In addition, the Commission may take into account considerations of hardship, equity, or more effective implementation of overall policy on an individual basis. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Waiver of the Commission’s rules is appropriate only if both (i) special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and (ii) such deviation will serve the public interest. NetworkIP, LLC v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 125-128 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Northeast Cellular, 897 F.2d at 1166. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-1666 2 to effectuate our ruling.5 We find good cause to waive section 54.507(d) because filing an appeal of a denial of funding is likely to cause petitioners to miss the program’s subsequent procedural deadlines in that funding year. Consistent with precedent, we also waive section 54.720 of the Commission’s rules, which requires applicants to seek review of a USAC decision within 60 days, for Cardinal Mooney High School, which submitted its appeal to the Commission only a few days late.6 2. We therefore remand the applications listed in the appendix to USAC for further action consistent with this order. To ensure that those applications are resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to complete its review of each application listed in the appendix, and issue a funding commitment or denial based on a complete review and analysis, no later than 90 calendar days from the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or as to the petitioners’ applications. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and those applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that sections 54.507(d) and 54.720 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.507(d) and 54.720, ARE WAIVED for the petitioners listed in the appendix to the limited extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 5 47 C.F.R. § 54.507(d) (requiring non-recurring services to be implemented by September 30 following the close of the funding year). 6 See Requests for Review and/or Waiver of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by ABC Unified School District, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-584091, Order, 26 FCC Rcd 11019, 11019, para. 2 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2011) (granting a waiver of filing deadline for an appeal because it was submitted to the Commission only a few days late). Federal Communications Commission DA 12-1666 3 APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed Annette Island School District Metlakatla, Alaska 746414 2010 Jul. 10, 2012 Antigo School District Antigo, Wisconsin 735567 2010 May 24, 2012 Auburn City School District Auburn, Alabama 622008, 658591 2008, 2009 Apr. 4, 2012 Austin Area School District Austin, Pennsylvania 812299 2011 Aug. 10, 2012 Cardinal Mooney High School Youngstown, Ohio 820997 2011 Sept. 26, 2012 Cleveland City School District Cleveland, Ohio 768082 2010 Sept. 20, 2012 Harmony Emge School District 75 Belleville, Illinois 722967 2010 Aug. 17, 2012 Haverhill School District Haverhill, Massachusetts 800329 2011 Sept. 12, 2012 Holy Family School Bronx, New York 768790 2010 Aug. 13, 2012 Lincoln-King Academy Detroit, Michigan 799706, 803834 2011 Jul. 25, 2012 Salem Central School District Salem, New York 749795 2010 Jun. 18, 2012 Montgomery County Intermediate Unit Norristown, Pennsylvania 788227 2011 Sept. 19, 2012 Washington-Parks Academy Redford, Michigan 799728 2011 Aug. 6, 2012 Waterloo Community Unit School District 5 Waterloo, Illinois 809100 2011 Sept. 5, 2012