Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 1 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the matter of WARREN C. HAVENS SKYBRIDGE SPECTRUM FOUNDATION VERDE SYSTEMS, LLC And its predecessor in interest, TELESAURUS VPC, LLC Applications for Waiver and/or Extension of the Five and Ten Year Construction Deadlines Applications for Renewal of 220 MHz Licenses ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) See Attachment A for Calls Signs and Associated FCC File Nos. Order Adopted: May 31, 2012 Released: May 31, 2012 By the Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this order, we address numerous filings made by Warren C. Havens (“Warren Havens”), Telesaurus VPC, LLC (“Telesaurus”), Verde Systems, LLC (“Verde”), and Skybridge Spectrum Foundation (“Skybridge”)1 regarding their 220 MHz licenses.2 We hereby grant Warren Havens’ petition for reconsideration of the pending termination status of call sign WQHZ610 and consider the license status along with the other Skybridge Licenses herein.3 However, we deny: (1) the requests for extension of the 1 We note for the record that Warren Havens is the president of Verde, Telesaurus, and Skybridge and is a signatory to all of the applications addressed in this order. Where appropriate, we refer to filings, arguments, and assertions made by Warren Havens and his companies jointly as having been made by “Havens” or “Applicants.” When referring to Warren Havens individually, we refer to him as “Warren Havens.” 2 See Attachment A for a complete list of the 394 licenses, their associated call signs, the FCC file numbers of their associated applications, and their associated construction and renewal deadlines. Skybridge is the licensee for call signs WQHZ577-773 (“Skybridge Licenses”). Warren Havens is the licensee for call signs WPOI514-622, WPOI843, WPOJ290-306, WPOK862-869, WPOK871-889, WPOK893-900, and WPOK933. Verde is the licensee for call signs WPOK890-892 and WPOK901-926, and WPOK928-932 (these licenses were assigned from Telesaurus to Verde). Since, at different points in time with respect to the issues addressed in this order, Warren Havens filed jointly with Verde and Telesaurus and Warren Havens is the president of both companies, we refer to the licenses currently held by Warren Havens and Verde (previously, Telesaurus) collectively as the “Havens Licenses” except where reference to specific licenses or their respective licensees is necessary. 3 See FCC File No. 003208764 (“WQHZ610 Petition”). Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 2 five and ten-year construction deadlines for the Havens Licenses;4 (2) the renewal applications for the Havens and Skybridge licenses;5 (3) the requests to consolidate all of the subject licenses under a single call sign;6 and (4) the requests for waiver or reduction of filing fees associated with these applications.7 Finally, we dismiss as moot the Petitions to Deny filed by Maritime Communications/Land Mobile, LLC (“Maritime”) and all subsequent responsive filings by Maritime and/or Havens.8 Accordingly, the Havens Licenses automatically terminated on November 5, 2007, the date of their first construction deadline, and the Skybridge Licenses automatically terminated on the date that each license expired.9 4 See Warren Havens and Telesaurus VPC LLC, Petition to Waive or Extend the Five-Year Construction Requirement (filed November 4, 2007) (“2007 Extension Request”); Warren Havens and Telesaurus VPC, Supplement to Pending 220-222 MHz Extension Requests (filed June 27, 2008) (“June 2008 Supplement”); Warren C. Havens Regional and EA Licenses, Amendment of Pending 2007 Petition to Waive or Extend the Five-Year Construction Requirement and the Ten-Year Construction Requirement (filed March 23, 2009) (“March 2009 Amended Extension Request”); Warren C. Havens and Verde Systems LLC, Fee Waiver and Refund Request, Amendment to Pending Extension Request Due to Lack of FCC Decision On It, Request for One “Ten Year” Construction Deadline of October 7, 2015, and Supportive Showing for Amended Extension Request, Renewal Expectancy Showing for Renewal Applications for all the Subject Licenses (filed October 7, 2009) (“Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Applications”); Warren Havens, Verde Systems LLC, and Skybridge Spectrum Foundation, Supplement to Extension and Renewal Applications (filed September 23, 2010) (“September 2010 Supplement”) (See Attachment A for associated FCC file numbers). 5 See Skybridge Spectrum Foundation, 220 MHz Licenses: Renewal Applications (filed March 23, 2009) (“Skybridge March 2009 Renewal Applications”); Skybridge Spectrum Foundation, 220 MHz Licenses: Renewal Applications (filed October 6, 2009) (“Skybridge October 2009 Renewal Applications”) (See Attachment A for associated FCC file numbers) (Except where reference to a specific application is necessary, we refer to the Skybridge March 2009 Renewal Applications and the Skybridge October 2009 Renewal Applications collectively as the “Skybridge Renewal Applications”); Warren Havens, 220 MHz Licenses: Renewal Applications (filed March 23, 2009) (“Havens March 2009 Renewal Applications”); Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Applications; and September 2010 Supplement. 6 See 2007 Extension Request at 9. 7 See 2007 Extension Request at 10; Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Applications at 2. 8 See Maritime Communications/Land Mobile LLC, Petition to Deny (filed November 6, 2009) (“Maritime Petition to Deny”); Maritime Communications/Land Mobile LLC, Petition to Deny Fee Waiver Request (filed November 6, 2009) (“Maritime Petition to Deny Fee Waiver”); Warren Havens, Verde Systems, LLC, and Skybridge Spectrum Foundation, Opposition to Maritime Petition to Deny (filed November 19, 2009) (“Opposition to Maritime Petition to Deny”); Maritime Communications/Land Mobile LLC, Reply to Opposition to Petition to Deny (filed November 25, 2009) (“Maritime Reply”); Warren Havens, Verde Systems, LLC, and Skybridge Spectrum Foundation, Supplement to Applications and Opposition to Petition to Deny (filed January 16, 2010) (“Havens January 2010 Supplement); Warren Havens, Verde Systems, LLC, and Skybridge Spectrum Foundation, Request to Accept Supplement to Applications and Opposition to Petition to Deny (filed January 16, 2010) (“Havens Request to Accept January 2010 Supplement”); Maritime Communications/Land Mobile LLC, Opposition to Request to Accept Supplement to Applications and Opposition to Petition to Deny (filed January 28, 2010) (“Maritime Opposition to Havens Request to Accept Supplement”); Maritime Communications/Land Mobile LLC, Opposition to Supplement to Applications and Opposition to Petition to Deny (filed January 28, 2010) (“Maritime Opposition to Havens January 2010 Supplement”); Maritime Communications/Land Mobile LLC, Petition to Deny Amended Application (filed October 5, 2010) (erratum filed October 7, 2010) (“Maritime Petition to Deny Amended Applications”); Warren Havens, Verde Systems, LLC, and Skybridge Spectrum Foundation, Opposition to Petition to Deny Amended Applications (filed October 20, 2010) (“Havens Opposition to Petition to Deny Amended Applications”); Maritime Communications/Land Mobile LLC, Reply to Opposition to Petition to Deny Amended Application (filed October 5, 2010) (“Maritime Reply to Opposition to Petition to Deny Amended Applications”). All filings referenced in this note apply to FCC file numbers: 0003990344-379, 0003989107-176, 0003990398-431, 0003223118-153, and 0003223081-114. See Attachment A for associated call signs. 9 See Attachment A for applicable license expiration dates. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 3 II. BACKGROUND 2. The Havens Licenses were originally granted in 1999 as part of Auction 24.10 Pursuant to Section 90.767 of the Commission’s rules, an Economic Area (“EA”) or Regional Economic Area Grouping (“REAG”) 220 MHz licensee must construct a sufficient number of base stations for land mobile and/or paging operations to “provide coverage to at least one-third of the population of its EA or REAG within five years of the issuance of its initial license and at least two-thirds of the population of its EA or REAG within ten years of the issuance of its initial license.”11 Alternately, licensees may provide substantial service to their licensed area at the appropriate five-year and ten-year benchmarks.12 Further, pursuant to Section 1.946(c), “[i]f a licensee fails to commence service or operations by the expiration of its construction period or to meet its coverage or substantial service obligations by the expiration of its coverage period, its authorization terminates automatically, without specific Commission action, on the date the construction or coverage period expires.”13 3. On January 12, 2004, Warren Havens filed requests for extension or removal of the five-year construction deadline set forth in Section 90.767(a) of the Commission’s rules14 for his 220 MHz licenses.15 Warren Havens argued, in part, that extension or waiver of the construction requirement was justified due to a lack of appropriate equipment available for use in the 220 MHz band.16 In response, on July 13, 2004, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (“Bureau”) released a Memorandum Opinion and Order extending the five-year construction deadlines to November 5, 2007 for all Phase II17 EA and REAG 220 MHz licenses that had filed requests for extension or whose first construction deadline fell after the date of the order.18 The Bureau found that the public interest would be served by granting these 220 MHz licensees, including Warren Havens, this extension and that an additional three years would be sufficient time for the licensees to construct their systems using available or soon to be released equipment.19 4. On October 24, 2007, Warren Havens submitted applications to disaggregate a large portion of the spectrum in each of his 220 MHz licenses and assign it to Skybridge.20 Telesaurus filed similar 10 See Phase II 220 MHz Spectrum Auction Closes, Public Notice, 14 FCC Rcd 11218 (July 1999). Some of the subject licenses were acquired by Havens in secondary market transactions after the close of Auction 24. 11 47 C.F.R. § 90.767(a). For consistency, we refer to this as the “construction requirement” or “construction deadline.” 12 Id. 13 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(c). 14 47 C.F.R. § 90.767(a). 15 See Warren Havens, Petition to Waive or Extend the Five-Year Construction Requirement: Partial Waiver of Section 90.767, with requests to apply to other Regional and EA Licenses (Jan. 12, 2004) (“2004 Extension Request”). 16 2004 Extension Request at 7-17. 17 See Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission’s Rules to Provide for the Use of the 220-222 MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Service, Third Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 10943 (1997) (“Third Report and Order”) (Establishing rules to govern the operation and licensing of the 220 MHz band, including the Phase II licenses.) 18 See Warren C. Havens, Bizcom USA, and Cornerstone SMR, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 12994 ¶ 19 (WTB-2004) (“220 MHz Extension Order”). 19 Id. at ¶ 20. 20 See FCC File No. 0003208764 disaggregating and assigning spectrum from call signs WPOI514-622, WPOI843, WPOJ290-306, WPOK862-864, WPOK866-869, WPOK871-877, WPOK879-889, and WPOK893-900, and (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 4 applications on November 1, 2007.21 For each of the subject licenses, Warren Havens and Telesaurus maintained only a fraction of the original licensed spectrum.22 In addition, for each of the licenses, save for call sign WQHZ610, Warren Havens and Telesaurus indicated that the assignor would be responsible for meeting the construction deadlines set forth in Section 90.767 of the Commission’s rules.23 For call sign WQHZ610, Warren Havens indicated that the assignor and assignee would be jointly responsible for meeting the build-out deadlines.24 Warren Havens subsequently claimed that the difference in the WQHZ610 application was an administrative error and asked the Bureau to modify the application for to render it consistent with the applications for the other call signs.25 5. On November 4, 2007, Warren Havens and Telesaurus applied for waiver or further extension of the five-year construction deadline for their Licenses pursuant to Section 1.946(e) of the Commission’s rules.26 Warren Havens and Telesaurus advance several arguments in favor of their extension request, including that: (1) there is a continuing lack of 5 kHz trunked equipment for the 220 MHz band, hampering build-out capabilities; (2) that they have conducted extensive due diligence with respect to the use of Terrestrial Trunked Radio (“TETRA”), Digital Mobile Radio (“DMR”), and other Intelligent Transportation Systems (“ITS”) for use in the 220 MHz band; (3) that the use of the Licenses for ITS in conjunction with 900 MHz LMS licenses held by Havens-affiliated entities constituted the best use of the spectrum; (4) that Warren Havens had acquired several of his Licenses in a bankruptcy proceeding that had not concluded until 2007; and (5) that the disaggregation of spectrum to Skybridge27 constituted a donation for public interest uses.28 In addition, Warren Havens and Telesaurus request that they each be granted a consolidated license for their 220 MHz holdings and that some or all of the fees associated with the Application be waived.29 Warren Havens and Telesaurus also contend that the Application meets the extension standards set forth in Section 1.946(e)(1) of the Commission’s rules30 and the waiver standard set forth in Section 1.925 of the Commission’s rules.31 However, they do not specifically plead the requisite elements of the waiver standard.32 On June 27, 2008, Warren Havens and Telesaurus filed a supplement to the 2007 Extension Request that purports to show the applicants’ due diligence in seeking to obtain (...continued from previous page) WQHZ610; FCC File No. 0003218561 disaggregating and assigning call sign WPOK933; and FCC File No.0003210896 disaggregating and assigning call signs WPOK865 and WPOK878. 21 See FCC File No. 0003218990 disaggregating and assigning spectrum from call signs WPOK891-892, WPOK901-908, WPOK910-925, and WPOK928-932; and FCC File No.0003218951 disaggregating and assigning spectrum from call signs WPOK890, WPOK909, and WPOK926. The applications in notes 19 and 20 are collectively referred to as the “Havens Disaggregation Applications.” 22 This varies from license to license but, in many cases, the original licensee retained 20 percent or less of the spectrum in each license area. 23 See Havens Disaggregation Applications, Schedule B. 24 See FCC File No. 0003208764 . 25 See WQHZ610 Petition at 1. 26 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(e); 2007 Extension Request. 27 See supra, paragraph 4. 28 2007 Extension Request at 5-9. 29 Id. at 9-10. 30 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(e)(1). 31 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.925; 2007 Extension Request at 4 and 9. 32 Id. at 9 (The section titled “Section 1.946(e)(1) and Waiver Standards Met” states only that “[t]his is evident from the substance of this request.”). Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 5 TETRA technology for use with their Licenses.33 6. On March 23, 2009, Warren Havens filed renewal applications for his Licenses.34 In these Renewal Applications, Warren Havens argues that he and his companies engaged in substantial due diligence to research and develop ITS technology and services for use in the 220 MHz band.35 He also claims that, “[h]ad the FCC ruled on the 2007 Extension Request, and it was granted, then [he] could have proceeded with the needed further development of technology and equipment to construct the licenses…and constructed today or, at minimum would have been much further along in completing due diligence to obtain the advanced 220 MHz technology and equipment for the nationwide ITS wireless plan for which the Licenses are dedicated…”36 He asserts that these showings, along with those set forth in the 2007 Extension Request and the March 2009 Amended Extension Request, are sufficient to satisfy the renewal and renewal expectancy requirements in Section 90.74337 of the Commission’s Rules.38 7. On the same day, Warren Havens also filed an amendment to his 2007 Extension Request.39 In this Amended Extension Request, Warren Havens requests an extension of both the five and ten-year construction deadlines for his Licenses until March 23, 2015.40 Warren Havens again claims that he has conducted substantial due diligence to obtain advanced wireless technology to put the 220 MHz spectrum to its highest and best use.41 He also restates, reiterates, and incorporates the arguments and assertions from his prior filings.42 8. On March 23, 2009, Skybridge also filed renewal applications for several of its Licenses.43 Skybridge claims that, pursuant to the earlier disaggregation and assignment action, its licenses do not include construction requirements.44 As a result, according to Skybridge, it “had and has no substantial service obligation, and thus has no substantial service showing to make.”45 Skybridge asserts that it “is using all of the subject Licenses in active research and development, and thereafter deployment, of advanced wireless for the nation’s Intelligent Transportation Systems (‘ITS’) and associated smart critical infrastructure and environment-resource monitoring and protection….”46 However, Skybridge does not claim to have built any facilities or provided any actual service in its license areas. Skybridge also references the Havens March 2009 Renewal Applications in support of its claims.47 Skybridge filed a similar renewal application for its remaining licenses on October 6, 2009, which referenced and incorporated the Skybridge March 2009 Renewal Applications and provided additional information 33 See June 2008 Supplement. 34 See Havens March 2009 Renewal Applications. 35 Id. at 2-4 and Attachments 1-3. 36 Id. at 1. 37 47 C.F.R. § 90.743; see infra, Section III(C). 38 See Havens March 2009 Renewal Applications at 4. 39 See March 2009 Amended Extension Request. 40 Id. at 2. 41 Id. at 4. 42 Id. at 2-3. 43 See Skybridge March 2009 Renewal Applications. 44 Id. at 1. 45 Id. at 1. 46 Id. at 1. 47 Id. at 2. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 6 regarding its plans to provide ITS, and specifically Network-RTK (“N-RTK”), services over its 220 MHz spectrum.48 9. On October 7, 2009, Warren Havens and Verde filed a joint application to: (1) renew all of the Havens and Verde Licenses that were not included in the Havens March 2009 Renewal Applications; (2) amend and supplement the 2007 Extension Request for those Licenses that were not included in the Havens March 2009 Extension Request; and (3) obtain waivers of the fees associated with the renewal and extension filings.49 This Application restates and incorporates many of the renewal and extension showings made in the prior filings of Warren Havens, Verde, and Skybridge.50 In addition, Warren Havens and Verde argue that they have “demonstrated important research and developments to put the spectrum to the highest and best use… with a focus… in support of N-RTK which is one of the most important new forms of wireless for the nation.”51 They also contend that the Applications meet the waiver standard set forth in Section 1.925 of the Commission’s rules52 because: (1) the future use of the licenses will be the highest and best use; (2) the licenses will be used by a nonprofit corporation that is legally required to use the licenses in direct support of government agency needs and other public interest purposes; (3) until recently, no commercially viable equipment was available for the subject spectrum and the equipment available now will require modification into N-RTK GNSS receivers; and (4) application of the construction deadline will frustrate the purpose of the rule.53 Warren Havens and Verde argue that even though they have requested several construction deadline extensions, the amended Applications should be granted for “entirely clear public interest reasons” in that the spectrum at issue “will, at last, be put to an excellent purpose – one that did not exist until recently.”54 However, Warren Havens and Verde do not claim that they are providing service, substantial or otherwise, within their respective license areas. On September 23, 2010, Warren Havens, Verde, and Skybridge filed a further supplement to their Extension and Renewal Applications to “demonstrate major additional due diligence and otherwise to support the previous requests for either extension or renewal as clearly in the public interest to grant.”55 10. On November 6, 2009, Maritime filed Petitions to Deny the Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Applications, the Skybridge October 2009 Renewal Applications, and the associated request for a fee waiver.56 Maritime asserts that these Applications are procedurally defective and were filed improperly. Further, Maritime argues that Commission precedent compels denial of the applications and that Skybridge has not made its case for renewal.57 Maritime also questions Warren Havens’ candor based on his actions in other dockets.58 11. On November 19, 2009, Warren Havens, Verde, and Skybridge filed an Opposition to 48 See Skybridge October 2009 Renewal Applications. 49 See Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Applications. 50 Id. 51 Id. at 8. 52 47 C.F.R. § 1.925. 53 Id. 54 Id. at 9. 55 See September 2010 Supplement at 1-2. 56 See Maritime Petition to Deny and Maritime Petition to Deny Fee Waiver. 57 See Maritime Petition to Deny at 2-11. 58 Id. at 11-14. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 7 Maritime’s Petition to Deny.59 Havens contends that Maritime: (1) lacked standing to bring its Petition to Deny; (2) that the Petition to Deny was an impermissible “strike petition”; (3) and that the Petition contains numerous other procedural defects.60 Havens also counters Maritime’s arguments regarding the validity of the Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Requests.61 Maritime filed a Reply to the Opposition on November 25, 2009.62 12. On January 16, 2010, Warren Havens, Verde, and Skybridge submitted a supplement to the Applications and the Opposition.63 In the Supplement, the Applicants again assert that N-RTK is the highest and best use of the subject spectrum and present evidence of their ongoing diligence to obtain the requisite technology and approvals to deploy N-RTK across the Havens and Skybridge Licenses.64 On January 28, 2010, Maritime filed Oppositions to the January 2010 Supplement and the Request to Accept the January 2010 Supplement.65 Subsequently, on October 5, 2010, Maritime filed a Petition to Deny the Amended Applications, contending that the amendments “provided no information even to suggest that he [Havens] had constructed any facility during the ten years that he held the licenses…”66 Warren Havens, Verde, and Skybridge filed an Opposition to this Petition to Deny on October 20, 201067 and Maritime submitted a Reply on November 1, 2010.68 III. DISCUSSION 13. After careful review of the record and considering all of the relevant circumstances, we grant Warren Havens’ petition for reconsideration of the pending termination status of call sign WQHZ610. We deny: (1) the Extension and Renewal Applications filed by Warren Havens, Verde, and Skybridge for all of their 220 MHz Licenses, including WQHZ610; (2) the requests for waivers of filing fees associated with the subject applications; and (3) the requests for consolidation of the subject licenses under a single call sign for each licensee. We also dismiss as moot the Petitions to Deny filed by Maritime as well as all subsequent responsive filings by Maritime or Havens. A. Treatment of WQHZ610 14. License WQHZ610 was assigned to Skybridge, along with 196 other licenses, pursuant to the Havens Disaggregation Applications.69 For the other licenses, Warren Havens selected “Disaggregation Option 1,” which kept the construction requirement with the original licenses. However, for WQHZ610, Warren Havens selected “Disaggregation Option 3,” which assigned the construction requirement jointly between the original license and the new Skybridge license. Neither Skybridge nor Warren Havens filed a 59 See Opposition to Maritime Petition to Deny. All citations are to the errata version of the Opposition, which was filed on November 20, 2009. 60 Id. 61 Id. 62 See Maritime Reply. 63 Havens January 2010 Supplement and Havens Request to Accept January 2010 Supplement. 64 Id. at 5-7. 65 See Maritime Opposition to Havens January 2010 Supplement and Maritime Opposition to Havens Request to Accept Supplement. 66 Maritime Petition to Deny Amended Applications at 2. 67 See Havens Opposition to Petition to Deny Amended Application. 68 See Maritime Reply to Opposition to Petition to Deny Amended Application. 69 See Havens Disaggregation Applications; WQHZ610 Petition at 1. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 8 timely construction notification and, as a result, WQHZ610 was automatically placed in “termination pending” status and a notification was issued to this effect.70 Warren Havens and Skybridge subsequently filed the Petition for Reconsideration, asserting that “[i]t was not the intent or per the agreement of Petitioners, but a mistake due to simple oversight to have listed Disaggregation Option #3 for the License on the Application” and asked the Bureau to return the license to active status.71 15. We find that Warren Havens and Skybridge have provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the selection of Disaggregation Option Number 3 for license WQHZ610 was due to an inadvertent oversight by the parties. Accordingly, we grant the parties’ request to treat the license as if Disaggregation Option 1 had been selected. As a result, license WQHZ610 is considered along with the rest of the Skybridge licenses in the remainder of this Order, and automatically terminated along with the other Skybridge Licenses for the reasons set forth in Section III(D) below. B. Extension of the Construction Deadlines 16. Under Section 1.946(e) of the Commission’s rules, an extension of time to complete construction “may be granted if the licensee shows that the failure to meet the construction or coverage deadline is due to involuntary loss of site or other causes beyond its control.”72 Section 1.946 also lists specific circumstances where extension requests will not be granted, including delays caused by a failure to obtain financing, because the license undergoes a transfer of control, or because the licensee fails to order equipment in a timely manner.73 The applicable extension standard must be considered in conjunction with Section 309(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, which states that the Commission shall include performance requirements to ensure prompt delivery of services, to prevent stockpiling and warehousing of spectrum by licensees, and to promote investment and deployment of new technologies and services.74 17. As noted above, in the 2007 Extension Request, Warren Havens and Telesaurus claim that “there is no equipment produced and supported by an equipment vendor that is available for construction and operation of the [s]ubject [l]icenses for their intended primary trunked-system purpose on their 5 kHz- wide channels, and this lack of equipment is beyond the control of the [l]icensees….”75 Warren Havens and Telesaurus also ask the Bureau to give special consideration to the fact that: (1) they acquired several of their licenses in a bankruptcy proceeding; (2) that they have donated a significant amount of spectrum to public interest causes (in the form of the licenses assigned and disaggregated to Skybridge); and (3) they, along with their affiliates, have engaged in extensive “due diligence” to develop ITS services for use on the 220 MHz band, which they believe is the best use of the band.76 However, the Applicants have voluntarily chosen not to construct facilities within their license areas, nor have they provided concrete near term plans to provide actual service in those areas.77 Therefore, we find that the arguments raised by 70 See Notice of Termination Pending Status for Call Sign WQHZ610 (sent December 12, 2007); see also Havens Disaggregation Applications; WQHZ610 Petition at 1. 71 WQHZ610 Petition at 1. 72 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(e). 73 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.946(e)(2)-(3). 74 See 47 U.S.C § 309(j)(4)(B). 75 2007 Extension Request at 4. 76 Id. at 5-9 and Attachments. 77 The Applicants’ lack of a concrete plan for their Licenses is further demonstrated by the shifting and seemingly contradictory nature of their plans for the spectrum and justifications for seeking an extension of the construction deadline. In the 2004 Extension Request, Warren Havens claims that an extension is warranted primarily because of the lack of 5 kHz trunked equipment available for use in the 220 MHz spectrum band. See 2004 Extension Request (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 9 the Applicants do not justify further extension of the construction deadlines for the Havens Licenses. Indeed, we believe that granting the Extension Request would undermine the fundamental goals of the Commission’s performance requirements, specifically the promotion and rapid deployment of services to the public and the prevention of spectrum warehousing. 18. As an initial matter, we find that equipment was readily available for use in the 220 MHz band prior to the construction deadlines. In the 220 MHz Extension Order, the Bureau noted that there were several factors that would allow 220 MHz licensees to effectively develop and use their licenses in the near term, prior to the extended deadline.78 Specifically, the Bureau cited to comments in the record that indicated that: (1) new digital equipment could be made available in the near term; (2) licensees were aggregating multiple 5 kHz channels to utilize 12.5 kHz equipment that was already available in the band; and (3) that the flexibility provided in the 1997 restructuring of the 220 MHz service rules would allow licensees to take advantage of a wide variety of new uses of the band, including fixed data applications.79 Indeed, a search of the Commission’s equipment authorization database reveals that numerous pieces of equipment were made available for use by 220 MHz licensees prior to the construction deadlines for the Havens Licenses.80 Moreover, between 2004 and 2007, several 220 MHz licensees took advantage of the relief granted by the Bureau to meet their construction requirements and begin offering service in their license areas.81 However, despite the availability of equipment, the Applicants opted not to meet their construction obligations and instead chose to pursue technology and services for which equipment was not available. 19. We have consistently found that voluntary business decisions are not circumstances beyond the licensee’s control within the meaning of Section 1.946 and, as such, do not constitute a valid basis for regulatory relief.82 In addition, prior to the 220 MHz auctions, the Commission stated that: (...continued from previous page) at 7-17. In the 2007 Extension Request, Warren Havens and Telesaurus assert that an extension should be granted based on the unavailability of 5 kHz equipment, but also claim that they have performed substantial due diligence to remove obstacles hindering the use of TETRA (25 kHz channels) and/or DRM (12.5 kHz channels) technologies. They assert that these technologies constitute the best use of the 220 MHz spectrum. See 2007 Extension Request at 8 and Exhibits. The June 2008 Supplement is entirely dedicated to detailing Warren Havens and Telesaurus’s efforts to develop and obtain TETRA technology and equipment for use in the 220 MHz spectrum. They make no mention of 5 kHz trunked equipment whatsoever. See June 2008 Supplement at 1-3 and Exhibits. In the March 2009 Amended Extension Request and the Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Applications, Warren Havens and Verde again alter their plans by seeking until 2015 to meet their five and ten-year construction obligations and introducing a proposal to support “Network RTK (‘N-RTK’) nationwide for government agencies, ITS public safety and emergency response operations, and many other critical industries and operations.” See March 2009 Amended Extension Request at 5 and Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Applications at 8-9. 78 See 220 MHz Extension Order at ¶¶ 16-18. 79 Id; see also Third Report and Order. 80Equipment authorization search for the 220-22 MHz band can be performed at: https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/genericsearch.cfm. 81 See, e.g., Coverage Notifications of Data Radio Management Co, Inc. for Call Signs WPOK830, WPOK831, and WPOK834 (filed October 7, 2009); Coverage Notifications of ESP Wireless Technology Group for Call Signs WPOJ377 and WPOJ389 (filed April 13, 2009); Coverage Notifications of Communications Specialists Inc. for Call Signs WPOI493, WPOI494, WPOI495, WPOI496, WPOI497 (filed January 6, 2009). 82 See, e.g., Redwood Wireless Minnesota, LLC, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 22416 (WTB-CWD 2002) (construction delays resulting from business disputes were exercise of business judgment and were not outside Petitioner’s control); Eldorado Communications LLC, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 24613 (WTB-CWD 2002) (licensee’s determination to initially deploy TDMA system and subsequently to adopt GSM with months remaining before construction deadline was business decision within its control); Bristol MAS Partners, Order, 14 FCC Rcd 5007 (WTB-PSPWD 1999) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 10 [t]he Commission makes no warranties about the use of this spectrum for particular services. Applicants should be aware that a Commission auction represents an opportunity to become a Commission licensee in this service, subject to certain conditions and regulations. A Commission auction does not constitute an endorsement by the Commission of any particular services, technologies, or products, nor does a Commission license constitute a guarantee of business success. Applicants should perform their individual due diligence before proceeding as they would with any new business venture.83 Thus, auction participants received clear notice that they would be expected to meet the construction requirements set forth in the Commission’s rules, regardless of the business plans or strategies they ultimately chose to pursue. 20. Rather than taking advantage of the regulatory relief granted by the Commission and the expanded equipment options in the 220 MHz band to provide actual service to the public, the Applicants made a voluntary business decision to pursue alternate technologies and rely on continued extensions of the construction deadlines. While the Applicants may have desired to provide ITS services within their license areas, the unavailability of the specific type of equipment required to support their chosen business model does not constitute valid grounds for an extension under the Commission’s rules. In addition, Applicants’ claimed “due diligence” regarding the future use of ITS, TETRA, and N-RTK services is irrelevant because no material progress was made towards actual construction or provision of services. While licensees are free to investigate, invest in, and pursue a wide range of technologies and service options, regulatory compliance is ultimately demonstrated by material accomplishments in the use of the spectrum resource to provide service. If granted, the extensions would result in a significant portion of the 220 MHz band remaining fallow across the country for a period of as much as 16 years entirely due to Applicants’ voluntary decision to pursue alternate technologies instead of deploying viable, existing equipment within their license areas. Accordingly, we find that: (1) Applicants have not provided actual service in their license areas; (2) this failure was not caused by circumstances beyond their control; (3) the claimed due diligence, conceptual plans, or other factors described in Applicants’ filings do not support a further extension of the construction deadline; (4) Applicants have presented no compelling precedent or evidence to support their request for special considerations based on their donation of spectrum to Skybridge or their acquisition of certain 220 MHz licenses during a bankruptcy proceeding; and (5) allowing Warren Havens and Verde to continue to hold these licenses without constructing facilities or providing any actual service would undermine the purpose of the Commission’s rules and Section 309(j) of the Communications Act.84 (...continued from previous page) (equipment installation or delivery not delayed for some unique reason and licensee failing to obtain equipment was business decision); AAT Electronics Corporation, 93 FCC 2d 1034 (1983) (decision not to market service aggressively because of equipment uncertainties is within licensee’s control); Business Radio Communications Systems, Inc., 102 FCC 2d 714 (1985) (construction delay caused by zoning challenge not a circumstance beyond licensee's control); Texas Two-Way, Inc., 98 FCC 2d 1300 (1984), aff'd sub nom., Texas Two-Way, Inc. v. FCC, 762 F.2d 138 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (licensee is responsible for delay resulting from interference caused by construction adjacent to construction site because site selection was an independent business decision); Letter dated May 6, 2011 from Thomas Derenge, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Dean S. Kozel, Longhorn Communications Inc., 26 FCC Rcd 6716 (WTB-MD 2011); Letter dated June 26, 2009 from Roger S. Noel, Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau to David G. Boyle, 24 FCC Rcd 8600 (WTB- MD 2009). 83 Third Report and Order at ¶ 19. 84 See Letter dated May 6, 2011 from Thomas Derenge, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Dean S. Kozel, Longhorn Communications Inc., 26 FCC Rcd 6716 (WTB-MD 2011) (finding that an extension request based on the licensee’s pursuit of alternate business plans could undercut (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 11 21. We note that these findings are consistent with our treatment of other 220 MHz licensees that sought additional relief from their construction deadlines after the release of the 220 MHz Extension Order. In these cases, we denied licensees’ requests for further extensions based largely on the fact that viable equipment was available and that other licensees had effectively used that equipment to meet their construction requirements and begin providing service within their license areas.85 Our findings are also consistent with our treatment of similarly situated licensees in the 218-219 MHz service band.86 C. Waiver of the Construction Deadlines 22. Under Section 1.925 of the Commission’s rules, a waiver may be granted if the petitioner establishes either that: (1) the underlying purpose of the rule would not be served or would be frustrated by application to the instant case, and that grant of the waiver would be in the public interest; or (2) where the petitioner establishes unique or unusual factual circumstances, application of the rule would be inequitable, unduly burdensome, or contrary to the public interest, or the applicant has no reasonable alternative.87 23. In the 2007 Extension Request, Warren Havens and Telesaurus assert that they are entitled to a waiver of the construction requirements for the Havens Licenses. However, they do not specifically plead the elements required for a waiver under Section 1.925 and instead claim that satisfaction of the waiver standards “is evident from the substance of this request.”88 Later, in the Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Applications, the Applicants argue they are entitled to a waiver of the construction requirements since: (1) the future use of the licenses will be the highest and best use; (2) the licenses will be used by a nonprofit corporation that is legally required to use the licenses in direct support of government agency needs and other public interest purposes; (3) until recently, no commercially viable equipment was available for the subject spectrum and the equipment available now will require modification into N-RTK GNSS receivers; and (4) application of the construction deadline will frustrate the underlying purpose of the construction requirements.89 24. After review of the Applicants’ Extension Requests, as well as all relevant amendments and supplements, we find that waivers of the five and ten-year construction deadlines would not serve the underlying purpose of the construction rules or the public interest. As detailed in Section III(B) of this order, the Applicants made a voluntary business decision to pursue technologies and business strategies that were unsupported by the existing equipment ecosystem and we do not typically grant licensees relief (...continued from previous page) the public interest if it is not supported by evidence that such business plans could be accomplished in the near term). 85 See, e.g., Letter dated June 26, 2009, from Roger S. Noel, Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Nancy J. Douglas, Douglas SMR Works, Inc., 24 FCC Rcd 8596 (WTB-MD 2009); Letter dated June 26, 2009, from Roger S. Noel, Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Robert LaRue, Know LaRue Separate Property Trust, 24 FCC Rcd 8621 (WTB-MD 2009); Letter dated June 26, 2009, from Roger S. Noel, Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Kansas City Wireless Partners, LLP, 24 FCC Rcd 8625 (WTB-MD 2009); Letter dated June 26, 2009, from Roger S. Noel, Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to David G. Boyle, 24 FCC Rcd 8600 (WTB-MD 2009). 86 See, e.g., Letter dated May 31, 2005 from Katherine M. Harris, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Buddy C. Stanley, ITV, Inc., 20 FCC Rcd 9548, recon den., Application of ITV, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 1908 (WTB-CWD 2007); Letter dated January 31, 2007, from Thomas P. Derenge, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Stephen E. Coran, Esquire, Counsel for U.S. Telemetry, 22 FCC Rcd 1921 (WTB-MD 2007). 87 47 C.F.R. § 1.925. 88 See 2007 Extension Request at 9. 89 See Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Application at 8-9. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 12 from their construction requirements for the consequences of voluntary business decisions. Moreover, the Applicants have not provided evidence that their shifting plans for the use of his 220 MHz licenses would lead to the near term use of the spectrum in question.90 Thus, we do not believe that the Applicants have presented convincing evidence that enforcement of the construction deadline would frustrate the purpose of the rule or be otherwise inequitable, unduly burdensome, or contrary to the public interest. Indeed, the very purpose of the Commission’s performance requirements is to ensure the prompt delivery of wireless services over licensed spectrum and to prevent spectrum warehousing.91 We also find that the Applicants’ business plan does not warrant a waiver of the construction obligation on public interest grounds, despite their avowed pursuit of the “highest and best” use of the spectrum. To the contrary, we find that granting the Applicants’ waiver request would harm the public interest since it would run counter to established Commission precedent and could encourage other present and future licensees to voluntarily pursue regulatory relief instead of providing actual service in their license areas. 25. Therefore, for the reasons set forth above, the 2007 Extension Requests, as well as all amendments and supplements thereto, are denied and the Havens Licenses automatically terminated on November 5, 2007.92 D. Renewal for Skybridge Licenses 26. Section 90.743 of the Commission’s rules requires 220 MHz licensees seeking renewal to demonstrate that they have “provided ‘substantial’ service during their past license term.” 93 For purposes of this rule, “substantial service” is defined as “service that is sound, favorable, and substantially above a level of mediocre service that just might minimally warrant renewal.”94 27. In its Renewal Applications, Skybridge claims that, since it acquired its licenses via disaggregation and assignment from Warren Havens and Verde and the construction obligations remained with the Havens Licenses,95 it is not required to make a substantial service showing to obtain a renewal under Section 90.743.96 Under Section 90.1019(d)(2) of the Commission’s rules, 220 MHz licensees are permitted to disaggregate spectrum so long as they “certify in FCC Form 601 which of the parties will be responsible for meeting the five-year and ten-year construction requirements for the particular market…”97 In establishing this rule, the Commission stated that: Consistent with other wireless services, we will allow the parties to the assignment agreement involving a covered Phase II license to negotiate and choose who will be responsible for satisfying the Commission’s construction requirements…the parties involved [in an assignment agreement] should have the flexibility to determine their respective responsibilities for satisfying the Commission’s construction requirements…[i]f one party takes responsibility for meeting the construction requirement and later fails to do so, that party’s license will be subject to forfeiture, 90 See supra Section III(B). 91 See 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(4)(B). 92 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 90.767(c); 90.1019(d)(2). 93 47 C.F.R. § 90.743(a)(1). 94 Id. 95 See Havens Disaggregation Applications. 96 See Skybridge March 2009 Renewal Applications at 1; Skybridge October 2009 Renewal Applications at 1. 97 47 C.F.R. § 90.1019(d)(2). Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 13 but the other party’s license will not be affected [emphasis added].98 However, this flexibility is clearly limited to “construction requirements.” The Commission also noted that “if one party (generally the original licensee) certifies that it will meet all future construction requirements, the other party need only demonstrate that it is providing ‘substantial service’ for its remaining license.”99 At no point does the Commission indicate that an assignee may be absolved from having to demonstrate that it meets the renewal standard under Section 90.743(a), including the requirement to provide substantial service within its license area.100 28. We find that Skybridge has failed to demonstrate that it has met its license renewal requirements for any of its licensees. Skybridge does not establish that it is providing any type of service with its licenses, much less a level of service that would satisfy the substantial service standard.101 Instead, Skybridge claims that it is using all of its Licenses for the active research and development of ITS systems and has not provided service to any of its license areas.102 Skybridge also claims that it has acquired a large endowment for charitable purposes and that it intends to use its Licenses towards the public interest, including providing N-RTK services at no charge.103 We find these factors unpersuasive because substantial service is a results-oriented requirement that mandates the provision of actual service within a license area during the applicable period (i.e. the license term).104 Indeed, we have previously found that a licensee’s plans for future construction and services are not sufficient to establish that said licensee has met its substantial service obligation.105 Therefore, Skybridge’s claimed “due diligence” and research regarding ITS is not sufficient to satisfy the substantial service standard set forth in Section 90.743. 29. Moreover, Section 309(j) of the Communications Act makes it clear that the purpose of performance requirements for licenses acquired via competitive bidding is to “ensure prompt delivery of service to rural areas, to prevent stockpiling or warehousing of spectrum by licensees or permitees, and to promote investment in and rapid deployment of new technologies and services.”106 At the end of its 10 year license term, Skybridge has not demonstrated that it is providing a meaningful service that meets the definition of substantial service or the underlying purpose of the Commission’s performance requirements (which include substantial service requirements). Interestingly, Skybridge goes so far as to argue that, due to its chosen disaggregation option, it has no affirmative obligation to construct its licenses at all.107 Such a finding would contradict the Commission’s stated goals in establishing the disaggregation and partition rules for the 220 MHz band as well as established precedent. Moreover, it would undermine the 98 Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission’s Rules to Provide for the Use of the 220-222MHz Band by the Private Land Mobile Radio Service, Fifth Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 24615, 24633 at ¶ 24 (1998). 99 Id. 100 See 47 C.F.R. § 90.743(a). 101 See 47 C.F.R. § 90.743(a)(1). 102 See Skybridge March 2009 Renewal Application at 1. 103 See id. and Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Applications at 7. 104 See, e.g., Scott D. Reiter, Demonstration of Substantial Service for PCS Station WPTB505, Order, 25 FCC Rcd 3974 (2010); Chasetel Licensee Corp., Request for Extension of Broadband PCS Construction Requirements and Construction Notification for Call Sign KNLF468 in Middlesboro-Harlan, KY BTA, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 9351 (2002). 105 See, e.g., Letter from Thomas Derenge, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, to Scott D. Reiter, Substantial Service Showing for WPTB505, 22 FCC Rcd 8635 (WTB-2007) at 3 (FCC File No. 0002727118). 106 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(4)(B). 107 Skybridge March 2009 Renewal Applications at 1. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 14 Commission’s public interest goals and effectively negate the purpose of its renewal requirements, essentially allowing speculators to obtain the public resource of spectrum and hold onto it forever without putting it to use in the public interest. Accordingly, we find that Skybridge has not met the requirements for renewal for its Licenses and, as a result, those Licenses automatically terminated at the end of their terms.108 E. Call Sign Consolidation 30. We deny the requests of Havens, Verde, and Skybridge to have their Licenses consolidated under a single call sign for each party.109 These requests are moot since all of the affected Licenses have automatically terminated pursuant to this order. Thus, it is not necessary to consider the merits of these requests. F. Fee Waiver 31. We deny the requests of Havens, Verde, and Skybridge for waiver of fees associated with their applications.110 The Petitioners do not provide sufficient evidence or legal authority for their request. We therefore find that there is no compelling reason to support such a waiver, particularly given that all of the associated applications filed by the parties have been denied in this order. G. Issues Raised by Maritime’s Petition to Deny and Subsequent Filings 32. Maritime raised several issues related to a subset of the Havens Renewal and Extension Applications in its Petition to Deny and Petition to Deny Fee Waiver.111 However, since we reached our conclusions regarding the disposition of the Havens Extension and Renewal Applications and the Skybridge Renewal Applications independently, we hereby dismiss the Maritime Petition to Deny, the Maritime Petition to Deny Fee Waiver, the Opposition to the Petition to Deny, and all other Maritime filings referenced above as moot. IV. CONCLUSION 33. For the reasons set forth above, all of the Renewal Applications and Extension Requests filed by Warren Havens, Telesaurus, Verde and Skybridge are hereby denied. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 34. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 0.131, 0.331, 1.925 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.131, 0.331, 1.925, that Havens and Skybridge’s request to consider License WQHZ610 along with the other Skybridge Licenses, IS HEREBY GRANTED. 35. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 0.131, 0.331, 1.925, 1.946(c) and (e), 1.955(a)(2), and 90.767 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.131, 0.331, 1.925, 1.946(c), 1.946(e), 1.955(a)(2), and 90.767 that the 2007 Extension Requests (including all Supplements and Amendments) for the Havens Licenses, 108 We note for the record that we do not address the Havens Renewal Applications in this section since those applications are rendered moot by our findings above. However, since the Applicants failed to demonstrate “substantial service” in his Renewal Applications, they would also be denied for the reasons set forth in this section. 109 See 2007 Extension Request at 1; March 2009 Amended Extension Request at 3. 110 See Havens November 2007 Extension Request at 10; Havens/Verde Extension and Renewal Applications at 2. 111 See Maritime Petition to Deny; Maritime Petition to Deny Fee Waiver. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 15 ARE HEREBY DENIED. Accordingly, all Havens Licenses, as outlined in Appendix A, TERMINATED AUTOMATICALLY ON NOVEMBER 5, 2007. 36. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 0.131, 0.331, 1.949, 1.955 and 90.743 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.131, 0.331, 1.949, 1.955 and 90.743 that the Skybridge Renewal Applications, ARE HEREBY DENIED. Accordingly, all Skybridge licenses outlined in Appendix A TERMINATED AUTOMATICALLY AT THE END OF THEIR INITIAL LICENSE TERM. 37. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 0.131, 0.331, 1.949, and 90.743 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.131, 0.331, 1.949, and 90.743 that the Havens Renewal Applications, ARE HEREBY DISMISSED AS MOOT. 38. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 0.131, 0.331, 1.925 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.131, 0.331, 1.925, that Havens’ and Skybridge’s requests for waiver of certain fees associated with their applications and license consolidation request ARE HEREBY DENIED. 39. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 0.131 and 0.331 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.131, 0.331, that the Maritime Petition to Deny, the Maritime Petition to Deny Fee Waiver, the Opposition to the Petition to Deny, and all other Maritime filings referenced in this Order ARE HEREBY DISMISSED AS MOOT. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas P. Derenge Deputy Chief, Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 16 ATTACHMENT A License Grant Date Call Sign Licensee Name First Construction Deadline Second Construction Deadline Extension Request - FCC File Number Renewal Application - FCC File Number License Expiration Date 03/23/99 WPOI514 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222953 0003783529 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI515 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222954 0003783599 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI516 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222955 0003783530 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI517 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222956 0003783609 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI518 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222957 0003783531 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI519 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222958 0003783532 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI520 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222959 0003783620 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI521 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222960 0003783626 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI522 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222961 0003783533 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI523 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222962 0003783641 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI524 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222963 0003783534 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI525 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222964 0003783600 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI526 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222965 0003783642 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI527 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222966 0003783535 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI528 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222967 0003783536 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI529 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222968 0003783537 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI530 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222969 0003783538 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI531 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222970 0003783627 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI532 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222971 0003783640 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI533 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222972 0003783539 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI534 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222973 0003783540 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI535 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222974 0003783541 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI536 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222975 0003783601 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI537 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222976 0003783643 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI538 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222977 0003783542 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI539 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222978 0003783543 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI540 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222979 0003783544 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI541 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222980 0003783616 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI542 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222981 0003783628 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI543 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222982 0003783545 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI544 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222983 0003783546 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI545 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222984 0003783547 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI546 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222985 0003783602 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI547 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222986 0003783621 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI548 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222987 0003783610 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI549 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222988 0003783548 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI550 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222989 0003783644 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI551 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222990 0003783549 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI552 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222991 0003783550 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI553 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222992 0003783629 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI554 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222993 0003783551 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI555 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222994 0003783552 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI556 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222995 0003783603 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI557 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222996 0003783553 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI558 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222997 0003783611 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI559 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222998 0003783554 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI560 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003222999 0003783555 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI561 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223000 0003783622 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI562 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223001 0003783630 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI563 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223002 0003783556 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI564 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223003 0003783617 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI565 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223004 0003783557 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI566 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223005 0003783639 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI567 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223006 0003783645 03/23/09 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 17 License Grant Date Call Sign Licensee Name First Construction Deadline Second Construction Deadline Extension Request - FCC File Number Renewal Application - FCC File Number License Expiration Date 03/23/99 WPOI568 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223007 0003783558 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI569 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223008 0003783559 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI570 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223009 0003783560 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI571 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223010 0003783561 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI572 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223011 0003783631 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI573 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223012 0003783612 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI574 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223013 0003783562 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI575 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223014 0003783563 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI576 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223015 0003783564 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI577 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223016 0003783604 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI578 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223017 0003783646 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI579 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223018 0003783565 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI580 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223019 0003783566 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI581 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223020 0003783567 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI582 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223021 0003783618 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI583 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223022 0003783632 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI584 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223023 0003783568 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI585 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223024 0003783569 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI586 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223025 0003783570 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI587 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223026 0003783605 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI588 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223027 0003783623 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI589 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223028 0003783653 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI590 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223029 0003783571 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI591 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223030 0003783647 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI592 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223031 0003783572 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI593 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223032 0003783573 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI594 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223033 0003783633 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI595 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223034 0003783574 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI596 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223035 0003783575 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI597 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223036 0003783652 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI598 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223037 0003783576 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI599 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223038 0003783613 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI600 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223039 0003783577 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI601 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223040 0003783578 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI602 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223041 0003783624 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI603 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223042 0003783634 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI604 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223043 0003783579 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI605 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223044 0003783619 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI606 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223045 0003783580 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI607 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223046 0003783606 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI608 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223047 0003783648 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI609 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223048 0003783581 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI610 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223049 0003783582 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI611 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223050 0003783583 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI612 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223051 0003783584 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI613 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223052 0003783635 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI614 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223053 0003783614 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI615 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223054 0003783585 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI616 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223055 0003783586 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI617 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223056 0003783587 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI618 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223057 0003783607 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI619 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223058 0003783649 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI620 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223059 0003783588 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOI621 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223060 0003783589 03/23/09 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 18 License Grant Date Call Sign Licensee Name First Construction Deadline Second Construction Deadline Extension Request - FCC File Number Renewal Application - FCC File Number License Expiration Date 03/23/99 WPOI622 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223061 0003783590 03/23/09 03/22/99 WPOI843 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/22/09 0003223062 0003781371 03/22/09 03/23/99 WPOJ290 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223063 0003783654 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ291 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223064 0003783636 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ292 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223065 0003783591 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ293 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223066 0003783592 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ294 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223067 0003783593 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ295 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223068 0003783608 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ296 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223069 0003783625 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ297 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223070 0003783615 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ298 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223071 0003783594 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ299 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223072 0003783650 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ300 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223073 0003783595 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ301 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223074 0003783596 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ302 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223075 0003783637 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ303 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223076 0003783597 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ304 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223077 0003783638 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ305 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223078 0003783598 03/23/09 03/23/99 WPOJ306 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 03/23/09 0003223079 0003783651 03/23/09 10/07/99 WPOK862 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223118 0003990376 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK863 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223119 0003990345 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK864 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223120 0003990344 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK865 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223121 0003990346 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK866 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223122 0003990347 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK867 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223123 0003990348 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK868 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223124 0003990373 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK869 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223125 0003990349 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK871 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223126 0003990371 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK872 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223127 0003990350 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK873 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223128 0003990369 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK874 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223129 0003990377 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK875 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223130 0003990351 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK876 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223131 0003990352 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK877 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223132 0003990353 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK878 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223133 0003990354 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK879 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223134 0003990374 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK880 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223135 0003990355 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK881 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223136 0003990367 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK882 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223137 0003990356 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK883 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223138 0003990357 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK884 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223139 0003990378 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK885 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223140 0003990358 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK886 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223141 0003990359 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK887 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223142 0003990360 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK888 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223143 0003990375 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK889 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223144 0003990370 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK890 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223081 0003990428 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK891 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223082 0003990398 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK892 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223083 0003990399 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK893 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223145 0003990361 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK894 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223146 0003990362 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK895 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223147 0003990363 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK896 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223148 0003990364 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK897 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223149 0003990379 10/07/09 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 19 License Grant Date Call Sign Licensee Name First Construction Deadline Second Construction Deadline Extension Request - FCC File Number Renewal Application - FCC File Number License Expiration Date 10/07/99 WPOK898 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223150 0003990368 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK899 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223151 0003990372 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK900 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223152 0003990365 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK901 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223084 0003990400 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK902 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223085 0003990401 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK903 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223086 0003990402 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK904 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223087 0003990425 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK905 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223088 0003990403 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK906 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223089 0003990404 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK907 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223090 0003990423 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK908 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223091 0003990429 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK909 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223092 0003990421 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK910 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223093 0003990405 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK911 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223094 0003990406 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK912 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223095 0003990407 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK913 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223096 0003990408 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK914 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223097 0003990426 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK915 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223098 0003990409 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK916 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223099 0003990410 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK917 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223100 0003990411 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK918 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223101 0003990430 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK919 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223102 0003990412 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK920 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223103 0003990413 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK921 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223104 0003990414 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK922 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223105 0003990427 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK923 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223106 0003990415 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK924 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223107 0003990422 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK925 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223108 0003990416 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK926 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223109 0003990417 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK928 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223110 0003990418 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK929 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223111 0003990419 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK930 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223112 0003990431 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK931 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223113 0003990424 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK932 Verde Systems LLC 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223114 0003990420 10/07/09 10/07/99 WPOK933 Havens, Warren C 11/05/07 10/07/09 0003223153 0003990366 10/07/09 10/26/07 WQHZ577 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989107 10/07/09 10/26/07 WQHZ578 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989150 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ579 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710186 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ580 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710256 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ581 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710187 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ582 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710266 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ583 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710188 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ584 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710189 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ585 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710277 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ586 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710283 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ587 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710190 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ588 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710298 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ589 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710191 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ590 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710257 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ591 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710299 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ592 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710192 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ593 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710193 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ594 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710194 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ595 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710195 03/23/09 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 20 License Grant Date Call Sign Licensee Name First Construction Deadline Second Construction Deadline Extension Request - FCC File Number Renewal Application - FCC File Number License Expiration Date 10/24/07 WQHZ596 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710284 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ597 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710297 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ598 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710196 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ599 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710197 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ600 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710198 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ601 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710258 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ602 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710300 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ603 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710199 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ604 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710200 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ605 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710201 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ606 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710273 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ607 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710285 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ608 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710202 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ609 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710203 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ611 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710204 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ612 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710259 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ613 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710278 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ614 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710267 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ615 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710205 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ616 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710301 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ617 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710206 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ618 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710207 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ619 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710286 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ620 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710208 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ621 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710209 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ622 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710260 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ623 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710210 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ624 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710268 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ625 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710211 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ626 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710212 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ627 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710279 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ628 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710287 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ629 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710213 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ630 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710274 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ631 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710214 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ632 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710296 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ633 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710302 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ634 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710215 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ635 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710216 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ636 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710217 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ637 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710218 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ638 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710288 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ639 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710269 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ640 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710219 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ641 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710220 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ642 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710221 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ643 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710261 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ644 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710303 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ645 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710222 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ646 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710223 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ647 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710224 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ648 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710275 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ649 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710289 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ650 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710225 03/23/09 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 21 License Grant Date Call Sign Licensee Name First Construction Deadline Second Construction Deadline Extension Request - FCC File Number Renewal Application - FCC File Number License Expiration Date 10/24/07 WQHZ651 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710226 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ652 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710227 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ653 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710262 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ654 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710280 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ655 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710310 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ656 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710228 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ657 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710304 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ658 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710229 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ659 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710230 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ660 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710290 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ661 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710231 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ662 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710232 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ663 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710309 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ664 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710233 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ665 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710270 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ666 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710234 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ667 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710235 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ668 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710281 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ669 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710291 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ670 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710236 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ671 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710276 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ672 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710237 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ673 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710263 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ674 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710305 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ675 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710238 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ676 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710239 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ677 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710240 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ678 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710241 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ679 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710292 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ680 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710271 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ681 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710242 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ682 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710243 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ683 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710244 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ684 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710264 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ685 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710306 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ686 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710245 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ687 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710246 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ688 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710247 03/22/09 10/24/07 WQHZ689 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710311 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ690 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710293 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ691 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710248 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ692 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710249 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ693 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710250 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ694 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710265 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ695 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710282 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ696 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710272 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ697 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710251 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ698 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710307 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ699 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710252 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ700 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710253 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ701 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710294 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ702 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710254 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ703 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710295 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ704 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710255 03/23/09 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 22 License Grant Date Call Sign Licensee Name First Construction Deadline Second Construction Deadline Extension Request - FCC File Number Renewal Application - FCC File Number License Expiration Date 10/24/07 WQHZ705 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003710308 03/23/09 10/24/07 WQHZ706 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989108 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ707 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989152 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ708 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989109 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ709 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989110 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ710 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989159 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ711 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989163 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ712 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989111 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ713 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989155 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ714 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989112 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ715 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989151 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ716 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989170 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ717 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989113 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ718 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989114 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ719 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989115 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ720 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989116 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ721 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989164 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ722 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989153 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ723 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989117 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ724 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989118 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ725 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989119 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ726 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989176 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ727 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989171 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ728 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989120 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ729 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989121 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ730 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989122 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ731 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989156 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ732 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989165 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ733 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989123 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ734 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989124 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ735 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989125 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ736 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989162 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ737 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989160 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ738 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989154 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ739 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989126 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ740 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989172 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ741 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989127 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ742 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989128 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ743 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989166 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ744 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989129 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ745 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989173 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ746 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989130 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ747 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989131 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ748 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989132 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ749 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989133 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ750 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989134 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ751 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989167 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ752 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989135 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ753 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989136 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ754 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989161 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ755 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989174 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ756 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989157 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ757 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989137 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ758 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989138 10/07/09 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-848 23 License Grant Date Call Sign Licensee Name First Construction Deadline Second Construction Deadline Extension Request - FCC File Number Renewal Application - FCC File Number License Expiration Date 11/01/07 WQHZ759 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989139 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ760 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989140 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ761 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989168 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ762 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989141 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ763 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989142 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ764 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989143 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ765 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989175 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ766 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989144 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ767 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989145 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ768 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989146 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ769 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989169 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ770 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989147 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ771 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989158 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ772 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989148 10/07/09 11/01/07 WQHZ773 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 0003989149 10/07/09 10/24/07 WQHZ610 Skybridge Spectrum Foundation 03/23/09