Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
April 16, 2014
DA 14-512
Mr. Enrique Amezcua
X2nSat
1310 Redwood Way
Petaluma, CA 94954
enrique@x2nsat.com
        Call Sign:  E130177
        File No.:   SES-LIC-20130926-00838
Dear Mr. Amezcua:
On September 26, 2013, X2nSat refiled the above-captioned application
1
for a new VSAT 
network that includes a fixed earth station, located in Petaluma, CA, and three types of remote earth 
stations.
2
All earth stations would access the SES-2 (Call Sign S2826) satellite at the 87° W.L. orbital 
location, from points within CONUS, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands in the 
11.7-12.2 GHz (space-to-Earth) and 14.0-14.5 GHz (Earth-to-space) frequency bands.  Pursuant to 
Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a)(1), we dismiss the application, 
without prejudice to re-filing.
3
Section 25.112 of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112, requires the Commission to 
return, as unacceptable for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete, contains 
internal inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission’s rules.  For the reason set 
forth below, we find X2nSat’s application is deficient and subject to dismissal.
In the Commission’s previous dismissal letter, we requested that, for the 0.75-meter Newtec 
model MDM2200 antenna, X2nSat submit as part of any re-filed application information related to 
antenna performance.  X2nSat was required to submit information related to any one of the three antenna 
performance certification methods below:
1. the antenna manufacturer’s certification that demonstrates compliance with Section 25.209(a)
and (b) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § § 25.209(a) and (b) regarding antenna 
performance standards; or
2. the certifications listed in Section 25.220(d)(1)(i-iv) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R.§ 
25.220(d)(1)(i-iv); or,
                                                     
1
  This application is a re-filing of application SES-LIC-20130903-00775 that was dismissed as defective without 
prejudice to re-filing in FCC letter, DA 13-1973, released September 24, 2013.
2
  The three types of remote antennas are: 1.8-meter Skyware Global antennas; 1.2-meter Skyware Global antennas, 
and 0.75-meter Newtec model MDM2200 antennas. 
3
  If X2nSat re-files an application identical to the application dismissed, with the exception of supplying the 
corrected information, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1111(d).
Federal Communications Commission DA 14-512
3. the call sign and specific application file number in which this type of antenna has been 
previously approved.
4
X2NSat failed to submit any of the required information.  
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(c) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(c), 
and Section 0.261 of the Commission’s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. § 0.261, we dismiss 
X2nSat’s above-captioned application without prejudice to re-filing.
Sincerely,
Paul E. Blais
Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
Satellite Division
International Bureau
                                                     
4
  Fifth Report and Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 5666 (para. 59).  The Commission maintains a list of approved non-
routine antennas at http://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sd/nresa/#.