Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
July 2, 2014
DA 14-956
Ms. Michelle A. McClure
Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC
1300 North 17th Street
11th Floor
Arlington, VA  22209
mcclure@fhhlaw.com
Re:  Call Sign E060244
File No.: SES-MOD-20140613-00518
Dear Ms. McClure:
On June 13, 2014, L3 Communications IEC (L3 Comm) filed the above-captioned application to 
add an antenna to its fixed earth station in Point Magu, CA.  Pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of 
the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112 (a)(1), we dismiss the application as defective 
without prejudice to refiling.1
Section 25.112(a) of the Commission’s rules requires the Commission to return, as unacceptable 
for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete, contains internal 
inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission’s rules.  We find the L3 
Comm application is not substantially complete because it does not include a radiation hazard 
study for the new antenna proposed, as required by the underlined text included in question 28 of 
Form 312 and Section 1.1307(b) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(b).
While not a ground for dismissal, it is noted that the 11 GHz frequency that L3 Comm provided 
in items E41/42 of Form 312-Schedule B for the antenna receive gain is not within the requested 
frequency range of 11.7-12.2 GHz.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. 
§ 25.112(a)(1) and Section 0.261 of the Commission’s rules on delegations of authority, 47 
C.F.R. § 0.261, we dismiss L3 Communications IEC’s application without prejudice to refiling.
Sincerely,
Paul E. Blais
Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
Satellite Division
International Bureau
  
1 If L3 Comm refiles an application identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of supplying the 
corrected information, it need not pay an application fee.  See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1111(d).