Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
January 20, 2016
DA 16-70
Released: January 20, 2016
Charles R. Meeker
5377 Dry Creek Road
Healdsburg, CA 95448
Re: KRET-CD, Cathedral City, CA
Facility ID: 10536
FRN: 0006199038
Dear Licensee:
This letter is in reference to the license renewal application for KRET-CD, Cathedral City, CA 
(“Station”), which is licensed to Charles R. Meeker (“Licensee”).  We hereby admonish the Licensee for 
its violation of Section 73.3526(b)(2) of the Commission’s rules (“Rules”).
1
Section 73.3526 of the Rules requires each commercial broadcast licensee to maintain a public 
inspection file containing specific types of information related to station operations.
2
  In particular,
Section 73.3526(e)(11)(ii) of the Rules requires each commercial television broadcast station to place in 
its public inspection file records sufficient to allow substantiation of the licensee's certification, in its 
renewal application, of its compliance with the children's television commercial limits imposed by 
Section 73.670 of the Rules (“commercial limits certification”).
3
  A station’s commercial limits
certification must be placed in its public inspection file on a quarterly basis by the tenth day of the 
succeeding calendar quarter.
4
  In 2012, the Commission adopted Section 73.3526(b)(2) of the Rules
requiring licensees to upload elements of stations’ public files to an online Commission hosted website 
(i.e., a Station’s “e-pif”).
5
  This requirement included uploading copies of a station’s quarterly 
commercial limits certification.
6
  Broadcasters’ e-pif requirements were phased in between August 2012 
and February 2013.
7
  
                                                          
1
47 C.F.R. § 73.3526(b)(2).
2
47 C.F.R. § 73.3526.
3
See 47 C.F.R. § 73.670.
4
47 C.F.R. § 73.3526(e)(11)(ii).
5
47 C.F.R. § 73.3526(b)(2).
6
Standardized and Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Television Broadcast Licensee Public Interest 
Obligations, Extension of the Filing Requirement for Children’s Television Programming Report, Second Report 
and Order, 27 FCC Rcd 4535 (2012) (“Second Report and Order”)(requiring broadcast television stations to post 
their public inspection files, with limited exception, to an online Commission-hosted database).        
7
Beginning August 2, 2012, stations were required to post any document that would otherwise be placed in a 
station’s public file, with limited exception, to their e-pif on a moving forward basis.  By February 4, 2013, stations 
were required to upload to their e-pif, with limited exceptions, documents that were already in their physical public 
file prior to August 2, 2012.  See Effective Date Announced for Online Publication of Broadcast Television Public 
Inspection Files, Public Notice, 27 FCC Rcd 7478 (2012); Television Broadcast Stations Reminded of Their Online 
On August 1, 2014, the Licensee filed its license renewal application (FCC Form 303-S) for the 
Station.
8
  A staff inspection of the Station’s e-pif revealed that the Licensee did not comply with Section 
73.3526(b)(2) of the Rules by failing to upload copies of its quarterly commercial limit certifications for 
the entire license term.
9
  Following a request by staff, the Licensee promptly uploaded all missing
commercial limit certifications to the Station’s e-pif.  On January 11, 2016, the Licensee amended its 
license renewal application and certified that while it did not upload copies of its commercial limit 
certifications to the Station’s e-pif in a timely manner, the documents were prepared and placed in the 
station’s physical local public inspection file on-time and were available to the public for inspection.
10
  
While these late filings constitute a violation of Section 73.3526(b)(2) of the Rules, we have 
determined that an admonition is appropriate at this time.
11
  Therefore, based upon the facts and 
circumstances before us, we ADMONISH the Licensee for its violation of Section 73.3526(b)(2) of the 
Rules.  We do not rule out more severe sanctions for similar violations of this nature in the future.  We
also remind the Licensee that the Commission expects all television licensees to comply with the 
Commission’s public inspection file rules, including the requirement to upload certain public file 
documents to a Station’s e-pif in a timely manner.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, a copy of this Letter shall be sent by First Class and 
Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested to the licensee at the address listed above.
Sincerely,
Barbara A. Kreisman
        Chief, Video Division
         Media Bureau
Cc: 
James Primm, Esq.
James Primm Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 547
Arroyo Grande, CA 93421
                                                                                                                                                                                          
Public Inspection File Obligations, Public Notice, 27 FCC Rcd 15315 (2012); Television Broadcast Stations 
Reminded of the Upcoming Public Inspection Filing Deadline, Public Notice, 28 FCC Rcd 429 (2013); see also
Second Report and Order, 27 FCC Rcd at 4580, para. 97.
8
File No. BRTTA-20140801ACM (“KRET-CD Renewal”).
9
Section 73.3526(e)(11)(ii) of the Rules requires a licensee is required to retain its commercial limit certifications 
until final action has been taken on the station’s next license renewal application.   47 C.F.R. § 73.3526(e)(11)(ii).  
The Station last had its license renewed on June 12, 2007.  Therefore, the licensee should have had all commercial 
limit certifications in the Station’s e-pif beginning with second quarter 2007.  
10
KRET-CD Renewal at Exhibit 20.  
11
The Licensee states that it has put in place a system to ensure timely filing of on-line public file documents in the 
future.  Id.  Although corrective actions may have been taken to prevent future violations, this does not relieve the 
Station from liability for violations which have already occurred.  See International Broadcasting Corp., 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC 2d 793, 794 (1969) (permitting mitigation as an excuse based upon 
corrective action following a violation would “tend to encourage remedial rather than preventive action”).