Federal Communications Commission DA 21-708 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554 In re Application of Words of Hope Media For Renewal of License for Station KRWH-LP Sioux Falls, South Dakota ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Facility ID No. 194864 NAL/Acct. No. MB-202141410029 FRN: 0023088370 File No. 0000131293 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AND NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE Adopted: June 16, 2021 Released: June 16, 2021 By the Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Media Bureau (Bureau) has before it the application (Application) File No. 0000131293 (Application). of Words of Hope Media (Licensee) for renewal of license for low power FM (LPFM) station KRWH-LP, Sioux Falls, South Dakota (Station). In this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (NAL), This NAL is issued pursuant to sections 309(k) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), and section 1.80 of the Commission’s rules (Rules). See 47 U.S.C. §§ 309(k), 503(b); 47 CFR § 1.80. The Bureau has delegated authority to issue the NAL under section 0.283 of the Commission’s rules. See 47 CFR § 0.283. we find that the Licensee apparently willfully violated section 73.3539 See 47 CFR § 73.3539. of the Rules by failing to timely file a license renewal application for the Station. Based upon our review of the facts and circumstances before us, we conclude that the Licensee is apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500). II. BACKGROUND 2. Section 73.3539(a) of the Rules requires that applications for renewal of license for broadcast stations must be filed “not later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the expiration date of the license sought to be renewed.” 47 CFR § 73.3539(a). This provision applies to LPFM stations, including Licensee’s station, by virtue of section 73.801 of the Rules. 47 CFR § 73.801. An application for renewal of the Station’s license should have been filed by December 1, 2020, the first day of the fourth full calendar month prior to the Station’s April 1, 2021 license expiration date. See 47 CFR §§ 73.1020, 73.3539(a). The Application was not filed until January 14, 2021. The Licensee explains that in November 2020 its President, Drago Profir, was ill, that his personal email was the contact address for the Licensee, and that he did not see a notification from the Commission until January 13, 2021, when he returned to the Station. Application, Attachment, KRHW-LP Request for License. Licensee further notes that the staff of the Station had no access to his email and were unaware of the filing deadline. Id. III. DISCUSSION 3. Proposed Forfeiture. In this case, the Licensee failed to file the Application on or before December 1, 2020, as required by section 73.3539(a) of the Rules. The Application was not received until January 14, 2021. The Licensee explains that it was not aware of its filing obligations due to the illness of its President. 4. This NAL is issued pursuant to section 503(b)(1)(B) of the Act. Under that provision, a person who is found to have willfully or repeatedly failed to comply with any provision of the Act or any rule, regulation, or order issued by the Commission shall be liable to the United States for a forfeiture penalty. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(B). See also 47 CFR § 1.80(a)(1). Section 312(f)(1) of the Act defines willful as “the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of [any] act, irrespective of any intent to violate” the law. 47 U.S.C. § 312(f)(1). The legislative history to section 312(f)(1) of the Act clarifies that this definition of willful applies to both sections 312 and 503(b) of the Act, See H.R. Rep. No. 97-765, 97th Cong. 2d Sess. 51 (1982). and the Commission has so interpreted the term in the section 503(b) context. See Southern California Broad. Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4388, para. 5 (1991), recon. denied, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 3454 (1992). 5. The Commission has held that violations resulting from inadvertent error or failure to become familiar with the Commission’s requirements are willful violations. Whidbey Island Center for the Arts, Forfeiture Order, 25 FCC Rcd 8204 (MB 2010) (Whidbey Island Forfeiture Order) (citing PJB Communications of Virginia, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 2088 (1992); Southern California Broadcasting Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4387, 4387 (1991), recon. denied, 7 FCC Rcd 3454 (1992) (stating that “inadvertence ... is at best, ignorance of the law, which the Commission does not consider a mitigating circumstance”); Standard Communications Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 1 FCC Rcd 358 (1986) (stating that “employee acts or omissions, such as clerical errors in failing to file required forms, do not excuse violations”)). Moreover, the Commission has long held that “licensees are responsible for the acts and omissions of their employees and independent contractors,” Whidbey Island Forfeiture Order, 25 FCC Rcd at 8205, para 6 (rejecting argument that proposed forfeiture for untimely filing of renewal application should be reduced or cancelled based on the health issues and departure of the party responsible for Commission filings). and has consistently “refused to excuse licensees from forfeiture penalties where the actions of employees or independent contractors have resulted in violations.” Id. While we are sympathetic to Mr. Profir’s illness and the impact of the pandemic on the Station, Licensee was ultimately responsible for ensuring it complied with the Rules by filing a timely renewal application. See id. See also Community Celebrations, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 22 FCC Rcd 2053 (MB 2007) (issuing $1,500 notice of apparent liability where licensee explained untimely filing of license renewal application was attributed to principal’s death). It did not do so. 6. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and section 1.80(b)(9) of the Rules establish a base forfeiture amount of $3,000 for the failure to file a required form. See Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80(b) of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17113-15 (1997) (Forfeiture Policy Statement), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 CFR § 1.80(b)(9), note to paragraph (b)(9), Section I. In determining the appropriate forfeiture amount, we may adjust the base amount upward or downward by considering the factors enumerated in section 503(b)(2)(E) of the Act, including “the nature, circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation, and, with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as justice may require.” 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(E); see also Forfeiture Policy Statement, 12 FCC Rcd at 17100; 47 CFR § 1.80(b)(9). 7. In this case, the Licensee failed to file a timely renewal application for the Station. Further, Licensee’s explanation that it was unaware of the filing requirement does not excuse its inaction. However, the Licensee did file the Application prior to the expiration of the Station’s license. Taking into consideration all of the factors required by section 503(b)(2)(E) of the Act and the Forfeiture Policy Statement, we will reduce the forfeiture from the base amount to $1,500 for the failure to file a timely license renewal application because, as an LPFM station, the Station is providing a secondary service. See, e.g., Virginia Center for Public Press, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability, 34 FCC Rcd 9312 (MB 2019) (proposing $1,500 forfeiture for untimely filed renewal application for LPFM station). 8. License Renewal Application. In evaluating an application for license renewal, the Commission’s decision is governed by section 309(k) of the Act. 47 U.S.C. § 309(k). That section provides that if, upon consideration of the application and pleadings, we find that: (1) the station has served the public interest, convenience, and necessity; (2) there have been no serious violations of the Act or the Rules; and (3) there have been no other violations which, taken together, constitute a pattern of abuse, we are to grant the renewal application. 47 U.S.C. § 309(k)(1). If, however, the licensee fails to meet that standard, the Commission may deny the application – after notice and opportunity for a hearing under section 309(e) of the Act – or grant the application “on terms and conditions that are appropriate, including a renewal for a term less than the maximum otherwise permitted.” 47 U.S.C. §§ 309(k)(2), 309(k)(3). 9. We find that the Licensee’s apparent violation of section 73.3539 of the Rules does not present “serious violations” warranting designation for evidentiary hearing. Moreover, we find no evidence of violations that, when considered together, constitute a pattern of abuse. For example, we do not find here that the Licensee's Station operation “was conducted in an exceedingly careless, inept and negligent manner and that the licensee is either incapable of correcting or unwilling to correct the operating deficiencies.” See Heart of the Black Hills Stations, Decision, 32 FCC 2d 196, 198, para. 6 (1971). Nor do we find on the record here that "the number, nature and extent" of the violations indicate that "the licensee cannot be relied upon to operate [the station] in the future in accordance with the requirements of its licenses and the Commission’s Rules." Id. at 200, para. 11. See also Center for Study and Application of Black Econ. Dev., Hearing Designation Order, 6 FCC Rcd 4622 (1991); Calvary Educ. Broad. Network, Inc., Hearing Designation Order, 7 FCC Rcd 4037 (1992). Further, based on our review of the Application, we find that the Station served the public interest, convenience, and necessity during the subject license term. We will therefore grant the Application by separate action upon the conclusion of this forfeiture proceeding if there are no issues other than the apparent violation that would preclude grant of the Application. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and section 1.80 of the Commission’s rules, 47 U.S.C. § 503(b); 47 CFR § 1.80. that Words of Hope Media is hereby NOTIFIED of its APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE in the amount of one thousand five hundred dollars ($1,500) for its apparent willful violation of section 73.3539 of the Commission’s rules. 47 CFR § 73.3539. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.80 of the Commission’s rules, that, within thirty (30) days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability, Words of Hope Media SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture. 12. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by credit card, ACH (Automated Clearing House) debit from a bank account using the Commission’s Fee Filer (the Commission’s online payment system), Payments made using the Commission’s Fee Filer system do not require the submission of an FCC Form 159. or by wire transfer. The Commission no longer accepts forfeiture payments by check or money order. Below are instructions that payors should follow based on the form of payment selected: For questions regarding payment procedures, please contact the Financial Operations Group Help Desk by phone at 1-877-480-3201 (option #6), or by e-mail at ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov. 13. Payment by wire transfer must be made to ABA Number 021030004, receiving bank TREAS/NYC, and Account Number 27000001. A completed Form 159 must be faxed to the Federal Communications Commission at 202-418-2843 or e-mailed to RROGWireFaxes@fcc.gov on the same business day the wire transfer is initiated. Failure to provide all required information in Form 159 may result in payment not being recognized as having been received. When completing FCC Form 159, enter the Account Number in block number 23A (call sign/other ID), enter the letters “FORF” in block number 24A (payment type code), and enter in block number 11 the FRN(s) captioned above (Payor FRN). Instructions for completing the form may be obtained at https://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form159/159.pdf. For additional detail and wire transfer instructions, go to https://www.fcc.gov/licensing-databases/fees/wire-transfer. 14. Payment by credit card must be made by using the Commission’s Fee Filer website at https://apps.fcc.gov/FeeFiler/login.cfm. To pay by credit card, log in using the FRN captioned above. If payment must be split across FRNs, complete this process for each FRN. Next, select “Pay bills” on the Fee Filer Menu, and select the bill number associated with the NAL Account – the bill number is the NAL Account number with the first two digits excluded – and then choose the “Pay by Credit Card” option. Please note that there is a dollar limitation on credit card transactions, which cannot exceed $24,999.99. 15. Payment by ACH must be made by using the Commission’s Fee Filer website at https://apps.fcc.gov/FeeFiler/login.cfm. To pay by ACH, log in using the FRN captioned above. If payment must be split across FRNs, complete this process for each FRN. Next, select “Pay bills” on the Fee Filer Menu and then select the bill number associated to the NAL Account–the bill number is the NAL Account number with the first two digits excluded–and choose the “Pay from Bank Account” option. Please contact the appropriate financial institution to confirm the correct Routing Number and the correct account number from which payment will be made and verify with that financial institution that the designated account has authorization to accept ACH transactions. 16. Any request for making full payment over time under an installment plan should be sent to: Associate Managing Director—Financial Operations, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street, NE, Washington, DC 20554. See 47 CFR § 1.1914. Questions regarding payment procedures should be directed to the Financial Operations Group Help Desk by phone, 1-877-480-3201 (option #6), or by e-mail, ARINQUIRIES@fcc.gov. 17. Any written response seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture must include a detailed factual statement supported by appropriate documentation and affidavits pursuant to sections 1.16 and 1.80(f)(3) of the Commission’s rules. 47 CFR §§ 1.16 and 1.80(f)(3). The written response must be filed with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington DC 20554, ATTN: Albert Shuldiner, Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau, and MUST INCLUDE the NAL/Acct. No. referenced above. Filings can be sent by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission’s Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Effective March 19, 2020, and until further notice, the Commission no longer accepts any hand or messenger delivered filings. This is a temporary measure taken to help protect the health and safety of individuals, and to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19. See FCC Announces Closure of FCC Headquarters Open Window and Change in Hand-Delivery Filing, Public Notice, 35 FCC Rcd 2788 (2020). A courtesy copy emailed to Alexander.Sanjenis@fcc.gov will assist in processing the response. · Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701. · Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 45 L Street, NE, Washington, DC 20554. 18. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a claim of inability to pay unless the respondent submits: (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2) financial statements prepared according to generally accepted accounting practices (GAAP); or (3) some other reliable and objective documentation that accurately reflects the respondent’s current financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted. Inability to pay, however, is only one of several factors that the Commission will consider in determining the appropriate forfeiture, and we have discretion to not reduce or cancel the forfeiture if other prongs of section § 503(b)(2)(E) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, support that result. 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(E). See, e.g., Adrian Abramovich, Forfeiture Order, 33 FCC Rcd 4663, 4678-79, paras. 44-45 (2018). 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that copies of this Notice of Apparent Liability shall be sent by First Class and Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Words of Hope Media, c/o Dragos Profir, 7100 E 26th St, Sioux Falls, SD 57110, and to its representative, James E. Price, III, Sterling Communications, PO Box 1877, LaFayette, GA 30728. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert Shuldiner Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau 2