Federal Communications Commission                 DA 22-825

                                    ATTACHMENT

Inquiry 3: sought {
                                                                 }1 but did not actually 
answer the question asked and, oddly, omitted any mention of when it in fact discovered the existence of a 
potential breach or a security vulnerability.2  
Inquiry 5(a): sought information “in detail” regarding {[            ]}, the March 31 LOI 
Response provided a terse and woefully inadequate response that failed to provide the specifically requested 
information.3  
Inquiry 5(d): sought a {[
              ]}, Q Link merely asserted that it [
                                                   } and Q Link’s answer completely failed to 
address the rest of the question, which asked for {[                           ]}.4
Inquiry 5(e): sought information “in detail” about {

                    ]}5  This response failed to describe {[
      ]}
Inquiry 5(k): sought detailed information about {

           ]}  Q Link merely responded that Apple and Google approved the app for distribution on their 
app stores.6
Inquiry 5(l): sought information about {

      }7
Inquiry 5(n): sought “in detail” information about {[
                                                                                     ]} 
Q Link responded only that it uses a crash-reporting tool that “does not monitor App security per se.”8  In 
response to a sub-question asking for specific information that Q Link {[
                              ]}, Q Link responded only that it was {[

                                                          ]}
Inquiry 6: sought “in detail” information about {[ 

1 Material set off by double brackets {[  ]} is confidential and is redacted from the public version of this document.
2 See March 31 LOI Response at 3-4, Response to Inquiry 3.  Documents provided with the LOI Response suggest 
that consumers may have communicated with Q Link regarding the potential vulnerability prior to publication of the 
Ars Technica article.  
3 See id. at 3-4, Response to Inquiry No. 5(a). 
4 See id. at 4, Response to Inquiry No. 5(d).
5 Id., Response to Inquiry No. 5(e).
6 See id. at 7, Response to Inquiry No. 5(k).
7 See https://firebase.google.com/docs/crashlytics/get-started. 
8 March 31 LOI Response at 7, Response to Inquiry 5(n).
9 Id. at 8, Response to Inquiry No. 5(n)(ii).
                                          10

                           Federal Communications Commission                 DA 22-825

                                                 ]} Q Link responded with the brief conclusory 
statement that they “designed the App to satisfy the standards that Apple and Google impose as 
prerequisites for distribution.”10
Inquiry 8: sought an explanation of the basis for {[                                  
                         ]}  Q Link’s responses again lacked the requisite level of detail.  Q Link 
answered that {                                                                        
                                                                                ]}11  
This response did not confirm how Q Link {[                                            
                                                                                    
                                                         }   In response to a sub-question 
asking {                                                                               
                                                                              }12
Inquiry 11: asked whether Q Link {                                             
                                                                                }]  This 
response was incomplete because it failed to identify {[                          
     ]}13
Document Request 16: requested {[
                                                                                     

                                   }
Document Request 18: requested {[                                                    
                                                 }15  {[                             
                                                  ]}
Document Request 19: requested documents {
                                                                                      

                                                            ]}  It seems unlikely at best that 
Q Link could have engaged in these activities—and responded to the news report— without {[ 
                                                             ]}


10 Id., Response to Inquiry No. 6.
11 Id. at 9, Response to Inquiry No. 8.
12 Id., Response to Inquiry No. 8(c).
13 See id. at 10, Response to Inquiry No. 11.
14 See id. at 11, Response to Request for Documents No. 16.
15 Id. at 12, Response to Request for Documents No. 18.
                                          11