7 FCC Red No. 3 Federal Communications Commission Record DA 92-96 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In Re Request of COMCAST CORPORATION For Declaratory Ruling Concerning Section 3 lO{b )( 4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended File No. MSD-91-23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: January 24, 1992; Released: January 31, 1992 By the Chief, Mobile Services Division: I. INTRODUCTION 1. Comcast Cellular Communications. Inc. (CCI), re­ quests a declaratory ruling that the appointment of John R. Alchin (Alchin). a Australian citizen to the corporate office of Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Comcast will not adversely affect the public interest. II. DISCUSSION 2. Alchin will not exercise superv1s1on or control over the operation of the licensed facilities of Amee!!. its sub­ sidiaries. partnerships controlled by its subsidiaries. or any other common carrier license controlled hy Comcast and is supervised by the President of Comcast. the Chairman and Vice Chairman. all of whom are United States citi­ zens. 3. Under Section 310(b)(4) 1 of the A<.:t. a station license may not be held by: any corporation directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which any officer ... [is an! alien ... if the Commission finds that the public interest will be served by the refusal or revo­ cation of such license. 4. By its express language. the ben<.:hmarks established in Section 3 lO(b )( 4) apply to entities. such as Comcast which directly or indirectly control licensees. The restric­ tions in Section 310( b )( 4) reflect national security con­ cerns and are designed to guard against foreign influence by limiting aliens· participation in <.:ertain domestic radio activities. See Request for Declaratory Ruling Concerning the Citizenship Requirements of Sections 310 (b) (3J and (4) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. (Wilner & Scheiner), 103 F.C.C. 2d 511, 516-517 (1985), recon., I FCC Red 12 (1986). Nevertheless, the statute permits licensing of a corporation controlled by another corpora­ tion which employs an alien officer where it is not con­ trary to the public interest. In previous cases. the Commission has found that the public interest would not be adversely served where the alien officers had no con- 895 trol or superv1s1on of the licensee corporations. Xerox Corporation,, 74 F.C.C. 2d 471 (1979): International Tele­ phone and Telegraph Corp., 67 F.C.C. 2d 604 ( 1978). 5. In view of Comcast's representation that Alchin will have no control or management oversight of A WACS licensees or its subsidiaries, we cannot find that the alien participation in Comcast would be inconsistent with the Act or the public interest. III. ORDERING CLAUSE 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the request for declaratory ruling IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gregory J. Vogt Chief, Mobile Services Division Common Carrier Bureau FOOTNOTE 1 The Bureau analyzed the alien participation in this case under Section 310(b)(4) of the Act because AWACS itself does not hold licenses. but controls Commisson licensees through its wholly-owned subsidiaries.