Federal Communications Commission DA 96-1927
Before the
Federal Communications Commission 
Washington, B.C. 20554
Southwestern Bell Telephone ) 
Company )
) Transmittal No. 2576 
Tariff F.C.C. No. 73 )
ORDER
Adopted: November 19, 1996 Released: November 19, 1996 
By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau:
1. On September 27, 1996, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (SWBT) filed 
Transmittal No. 2576. On that same date, SWBT filed a request pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 
0.459 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.457 and 0.459, and the Freedom of Information 
Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4) for confidential treatment of the cost support data filed in 
support of Transmittal No. 2576.1 On October 15, 1996, MCI Telecommunications Corporation 
(MCI) filed a petition to reject or, alternatively, to suspend and investigate Transmittal No. 2576. 
On October 25, 1996, SWBT filed a response to MCI's petition.
2. In Transmittal No. 2576, SWBT seeks to introduce Supertrunking Video Service 
(SVS) in its Special Access Service. According to SWBT, this new offering is being made in 
response to customer requests for fiber-based video transport needs.2 SWBT states that SVS 
provides one-way transport of multiple amplitude modulated (AM) vestigial sideband (VSB) 
standard 525 line/60 field monochrome or National Television Systems Committee (NTSC) color 
analog video signals and associated audio signals over fiber optic facilities. SWBT also states 
that SVS is capable of transporting up to 1106 Mhz channels over a video channel within a 
bandwidth of 54 to 750 Mhz.3
3. In its request for confidential treatment of the cost support data, SWBT states that 
the documents in question contain confidential information on investments, depreciation, cost of 
money, ad valorem and income taxes, administrative costs, and overheads. SWBT maintains that 
disclosure of such confidential financial information could substantially harm the competitive
1 Letter from Paul Walters, Counsel for SWBT to Acting Secretary, FCC, dated September 27, 1996 (Sept. 
27, 1996 Letter).
2 SWB Transmittal No. 2576, Description and Justification (D&J) at 1.1
3
16418
Federal Communications Commission DA 96-1927
position of SWBT by assisting competitors in preparing marketing strategies to use in direct 
competition with SWBT. According to SWBT, the cost support data contain the specific costs 
of the equipment required to provide this service. These data indicate the breakdown of capital 
costs and operating expenses as well as the total installed cost (total investment). SWBT 
maintains that if its competitors had access to this information, they could use it to calculate the 
factors used by SWBT in developing cost data and, in turn, the information could be used to 
derive competitive information from other SWBT filings.4
4. In its petition, MCI argues that Transmittal 2576 should be rejected or, 
alternatively, suspended and investigated because SWBT has violated Section 203 and 412 of the 
Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 203 and 412, and Part 61 of the Commission's rules, 47 
C.F.R. Part 61, for filing its cost support under confidential cover.5 Moreover, MCI maintains 
that SWBT does not make a persuasive showing that it faces sufficient competition for these 
services to justify confidential treatment of the cost support data.6
5. In its reply, SWBT contends that it does face serious competition for the services 
involved with Transmittal No. 2576. According to SWBT, disclosure of the detailed cost 
information provided by SWBT in Transmittal No. 2576 would enable its competitors to 
determine the annual cost factors for all services that SWBT provides with circuit equipment and 
as well as the price floor for all of theses services.7
6. Sections 0.4530) and 0.455(b)(ll) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 
0.453(j) and 0.455(b)(l 1), provide that material filed in support of tariff revisions are to be 
publicly available. SWBT, however, has filed a request for confidential treatment of its tariff 
support material filed in Transmittal No. 2576 under the requirements of Section 0.459 of the 
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.459 and Exemption 4 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4). 
Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.3 provides that the Commission may, on its
4 Sept. 27, 1996 Letter at 1-2, 4-5.
5 MCI Petition at 2. 
* Id. at 6-8. 
7 Id. at 3-4.
16419
Federal Communications Commission DA 96-1927
own motion, waive any provisions of its rules if good cause is shown.8 The Competitive Pricing 
Division finds that there is good cause to waive the Commission's rules that cost support data 
filed with Transmittal No. 2576 be publicly available. Therefore, on our own motion, the 
Division grants SWBT a waiver of Sections 0.453(j) and 0.455(b)(l 1) of the Commission's rules. 
As a result, the Transmittal No. 2576 cost support data for which SWBT sought confidentiality 
will not be publicly available. The Division grants this waiver for the limited purpose of 
reviewing this transmittal.
7. We have reviewed the transmittal filed by SWBT and all the associated pleadings. 
We conclude that no compelling argument has been presented that the tariff is patently unlawful 
and warrants rejection, and that an investigation of this transmittal is not warranted at this time.
8 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 0.291 and 1.3 of the 
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.291, 1.3, for the purposes of this proceeding, Sections 
0.453(j) and 0.455(b)(ll) of the Commission's rales, 47 C.F.R. 0.453(j), 0.455(b)(ll), ARE 
WAIVED.
9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition to reject or suspend and investigate 
SWBT Tariff F.C.C. No. 73, Transmittal No. 2560 filed by MCI Telecommunications 
Corporation IS DENIED.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
James D. Schlichting
Chief, Competitive Pricing Division
Common Carrier Bureau
* Section 1.3 of the Commission's rales, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, provides that the Commission may, on its own 
motion, waive any provisions of its rules if good cause is shown. Cf., WATT Radio v FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 
(D.C. Cir. 1969), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972); Northeast Cellular Telephone Company v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 
1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (discussing standards for granting waivers filed by parties).
16420