DA 96-281 Federal Communications Commission Record 11 FCC Red No. 6 
Before the 
Federal Communications Commission 
Washington, D.C. 20554 
In the Matter of 
Petition for Relief of 
KARL SCHROLL, 
Petitioner, 
vs. 
DISTRICT CABLEVISION LIMITED 
PARTNERSHIP, 
Respondent, 
For Leased Access Channels 
CSR 4371-L 
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 
Adopted: March 4, 1996; Released March 12, 1996 
By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: 
I. Introduction 
l. On August 22, 1994, Mr. Karl Sch roll filed a petition 
for relief under 47 C.F.R. § 76.975 alleging that District 
Cablevision, Inc. has violated 47 C.F.R. § 76.970 by failing 
to provide a schedule of rates for commercial leased access 
service on its cable system in the District of Columbia.' On 
February 15, 1995, the Commissio n received a letter from 
District Cablevision Limited Partnership. (herein "District 
Cablevision") dated February 13. 1995. in response to the 
petition, stating that a commercial leased access rate card 
was provided to Mr. Schroll with a letter from its General 
Manager dated August 29. 1994. A notation o n District 
Cablevision's response letter indicates that a copy of that 
response was sent to Mr. Schroll. 
2. The information provided hy District Cablevision ·s 
response indicates that Mr. Schrolrs petition for relief has 
been satisfied and that no further action by the Commis­
sion is required. By letter dated November 13. 1995. the 
Commission's staff requested Mr. Schroll to provide. within 
thirty (30) days from the date of its letter. or by December 
13, 1995, a statement indicating whether further prosecu­
tion of the petition is required . Mr. Schroll was further 
informed that if a response were not thus filed. a decision 
will be made on the existing record. No response has been 
received from Mr. Schroll. 
3. The record in this matter shows that District 
Cablevision provided Mr. Schroll with the requested com­
mercial leased access rate card by a letter dated August 29. 
1 For a general background discussion of the statutory and 
regulatory provisions relating to commercial leased access. see 
Advamage Video & Marketing, Inc. vs Comcast of Lower Merion. 
Inc., 10 FCC Red 7681-7682 (Cable Ser. Bur. 19<15). 
3000 
1994 and thus satisfied Mr. Schroll's petition for relief. The 
record further shows that Mr. Schroll has provided nothing 
which indicates that any further prosecution of his petition 
for relief is required. 
4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for 
relief of Mr. Karl Schroll in File No. CSR 4371-L IS 
DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to authority dele­
gated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 
C.F.R. § 0.321. 
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 
Meredith J. Jones 
Chief, Cable Services Bureau