11 FCC Red No. 6 Federal Communications Commission Record DA 96-285 
Before the 
Federal Communications Commission 
Washington, D.C. 20554 
In the Matter of 
Petition for Relief of 
KARL SCHROLL, 
Petitioner, 
vs. 
ARLINGTON CABLE PARTNERS 
d/b/a CABLE TV ARLINGTON, 
Respondent, 
For Leased Access Channels 
CSR 4373-L 
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 
Adopted: March 4, 1996; Released: March 12, 1996 
By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: 
I. Introduction 
1. On August 22, 1994, Mr. Karl Schroll filed a petition 
for relief under 47 C.F.R. § 76.975 alleging that Arlington 
Cable Partners has violated 47 C.F.R. § 76.970 by failing to 
provide a schedule of rates for . commercial leased access 
service on its cable system in Arlington County, Virginia.' 
On November 3, 1994, the Commission received a Re­
sponse to Complaint and Petition for Relief from counsel 
for Arlington Cable Partners <lib/a Cable TV Arlington 
(herein "Cable TV"), in response to the petition, stating 
that commercial leased access rate information was pro­
v_ided to Mr. Schroll by letter dated November 1, 1994. A 
certificate of service provided with the response indicates 
that a copy of that response was sent to Mr. Schroll. 
2. The information provided by Cable TV's response 
indicates that Mr. Schrotrs petition for relief has been 
satisfied and that no further action by the Commission is 
required. By letter dated November 13. 1995, the Commis­
sion's staff requested Mr. Schroll to provide. within thirty 
(30) days from the date of its letter. or by December 13. 
1995, a statement indicating whether further prosecution of 
the petition is required. Mr. Schroll was further informed 
that if a response were not thus filed. a decision will he 
made on the existing record. No response has been re­
ceived from Mr. Schroll. 
3. The record in this matter shows that Cable TV pro­
vided Mr. Schroll with the requested commercial leased 
access rate information by letter dated November 1. 1994 
1 For a general background discussion of the statutory and 
regulatory provisions relating to commercial leased access. set 
Advantage Video & Marketing. Inc. vs Comcast of lower .Werion. 
Inc., 10 FCC Red 7681-7682 (Cable Ser. Bur. 1995). 
JOOS 
and thus satisfied Mr. Schroll's petition for relief. The 
record further shows that Mr. Schroll has provided nothing 
which indicates that any further prosecution of his petition 
for relief is required. 
4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for 
relief of Mr. Karl Schroll in File No. CSR 4373-L IS 
DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to authority dele­
gated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 
C.F.R. § 0.321. 
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 
Meredith J. Jones 
Chief, Cable Services Bureau