DA 96-287 Federal Communications Commission Record 11 FCC Red No. 6 
Before the 
Federal Communications Commission 
Washington, D.C. 20554 
In the Matter of 
Petition for Relief of 
KARL SCHROLL, 
Petitioner, 
vs. 
JONES INTERCABLE, INC., 
Respondent, 
For Leased Access Channels 
CSR 4374-L 
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 
Adopted: March 4, 1996; Released: March 12, 1996 
By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: 
I. Introduction 
l. On August 22, 1994, Mr. Karl Schroll filed a petition 
for relief under 47 C.F.R. § 76.975 alleging that Jones 
Intercable, Inc. has violated 47 C.F.R. § 76.970 by failing 
to provide a schedule of rates for commercial leased access 
service on its cable system in Alexandria, Virginia. 1 On 
February 28, 1995, the Commission received from counsel 
for Jones lntercable, Inc. (herein "Jones lntercable") a 
response to the petition, stating that commercial leased 
access rate information was provided to Mr. Schroll by 
letter dated September 21, 1994. The record indicates that a 
copy of that response was sent to Mr. Schroll. 
2. The information provided by Jones lntercable's re­
sponse indicates that Mr. Schrotrs petition for relief has 
been satisfied and that no further action by the Commis­
sion is required. By letter dated November 13, 1995. the 
Commission's staff requested Mr. Schroll to provide. within 
thirty (30) days from the date of its letter. or by December 
13. 1995, a statement indicating whether further prosecu­
tion of the petition is required. Mr. Schroll was further 
informed that if a response were not thus filed. a decision 
will be made on the existing record. No response has been 
received from Mr. Schroll. 
3. The record in this matter shows that Jones Intercable 
provided Mr. Schroll with the requested commercial leased 
access rate information by letter dated September 21, 1994 
and thus satisfied Mr. Schroll"s petition for relief. The 
1 For a general background discussion of the statu tory and 
regulatory provisions relating to commercial leased access. see 
Advantage Video & Marketing, Inc. vs Comcast of Lower Merion, 
Inc., 10 FCC Red 7681-7682 (Cable Ser. Bur. 1995). 
3006 
record further shows that Mr. Schroll has provided nothing 
which indicates that any further prosecution of his petition 
for relief is required. 
4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for 
relief of Mr. Karl Schroll in File No. CSR 4374-L IS 
DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to authority dele­
gated by Section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 
C.F.R. § 0.321. 
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 
Meredith J. Jones 
Chief, Cable Services Bureau