11 FCC Red No. 8 Federal Communications Commission Record DA 96·527 
Before the 
Federal Communications Commission 
Washington, D.C. 20554 
In the Matter of 
The Detroit News, Inc. 
Licensee, Station WUSA(TV) 
Washington, DC 
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 
Adopted: April 3, 1996; Released: April 12, 1996 
By the Mass Media Bureau 
1. The Commission, by the Chief, Mass Media Bureau 
("Bureau"), acting pursuant to authority delegated by Sec­
tion 0.283 of the Commission's Rules, has under consider­
ation (1) a Notice of Apparent Liability adopted December 
5, 1995 (''NAL "), assessing a forfeiture of $2,000 against 
The Detroit News, Inc. ("Detroit News"); (2) a request for 
clarification filed by Detroit News; (3) a Petition for Re­
consideration and Further Complaint Against Station 
WUSA(TV), filed by the Ukrainian American Community 
Network ("UACN"); (4) Detroit News' Opposition thereto; 
and (5) UACN's Reply. 
Background 
2. The NAL was assessed against Detroit News for violat­
ing Sections 73.3526 and 73.1202 of the Commission's 
Rules (public inspection file and retention of letters re­
ceived from the public). Specifically, the Bureau found 
that Detroit News' failure to place letters regarding an 
October 23, 1994, 60 Minutes broadcast in Station WUSA's 
public file, including a letter from the complainant dated 
January 18, 1995, constituted willful and repeated viola­
tions of the Commission's Rules. Accordingly, a $2,000 
forfeiture was assessed and Detroit News was instructed to 
take "whatever steps are necessary" to complete the sta­
tion's public file. 
3. Detroit News paid its forfeiture, but sought clarifica­
tion regarding the Bureau's instructions to complete 
Station .WUSA's public file. It asserts that "appropriate 
measures" have been taken to ensure compliance in the 
future, but that it would be "burdensome and time-con­
suming" to locate the large volume of letters at issue which 
have apparently been forwarded to CBS. It asks for clari­
fication of whether or not the Bureau intended Detroit 
News to undertake such a "burdensome" project. 
4. UACN classifies Detroit News' request for clarification 
as a waiver request and urges the Commission to deny it. It 
asserts that Detroit News has not explained how compli­
ance with the FCC's instructions is "burdensome" or 
"time-consuming" and contends that Detroit News' claims 
in this regard lack candor. Further, UACN asks the Com­
mission to reconsider the NAL, arguing that a more signifi-
1 In light of our position, we need not decide whether to treat 
Detroit News' request as one of "clarification" or "waiver." 
4161 
cant forfeiture is warranted and that Detroit News' alleged 
misrepresentation and lack of candor in this proceeding 
warrants designation for hearing. Finally, UACN urges that 
an additional forfeiture be assessed against Detroit News for 
failing to complete, as yet, its public inspection file with 
respect to the missing 60 Minutes letters. 
Discussion 
5. Request for Clarification. The NAL instructs Detroit 
News to "take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that 
Station WUSA's public inspection file is complete." We 
recognize that it may be impossible at this point for Detroit 
News to find every letter sent to Station WUSA regarding 
the October 23, 1994, 60 Minutes broadcast. Accordingly, 
we only require Detroit News to use its best efforts to 
obtain copies of all such letters and place them in the 
station's public file. Such efforts may include sorting 
through large numbers of letters in CBS' storage files in 
New York. So that we may determine whether or not 
Detroit News has used its best efforts to complete Station 
WUSA's public file with regard to these letters, we request 
that Detroit News file a written report within sixty (60) 
days from the release of this Memorandum Opinion and 
Order, detailing how many letters have been retrieved and 
placed in the station's public file, what efforts were made 
to obtain such letters, whether or not it expects to obtain 
any more letters and, if so, how and when it expects to do 
so. 1 
6. Reconsideration of Sanction. UACN has not presented 
the Commission with any new information which would 
warrant an increase in the forfeiture amount, nor has it 
cited to any case precedent which would support the issu­
ance of a higher forfeiture for violations of the rule sec­
tions at issue here. Similarly, UACN has not presented us 
with any new information which would warrant designa­
tion for hearing, nor has it demonstrated that the Commis­
sion's decision not to designate the station for hearing 
constituted material error. Specifically, UACN disputes De­
troit News' claim that it would be burdensome to obtain 
the letters from CBS' storage files and contends that the 
letters at issue no longer exist, having been discarded, 
despite Detroit News' representations to the contrary. Such 
allegations of misrepresentation are. however, based on 
inference and speculation rather than fact. Although the 
NAL did not address UACN's misrepresentation allega­
tions, such allegations were fully considered at the time the 
NAL was issued. We have again reviewed such allegations 
and remain satisfied that no material questions exist which 
warrant designation of the station for hearing. 
7. Allegations of Continued Rule Violations. We likewise 
deny UACN's request for the issuance of an additional 
forfeiture because of Detroit News' continued failure to 
place the letters at issue in Station WUSA's public file. 
Detroit News indicates that it has "taken appropriate mea­
sures to assure compliance" with the Commission's public 
inspection file rule in the future. It, however, requested 
clarification as to the necessity of locating the 60 Minutes 
letters and placing them in the public file. We have now 
provided such clarification and expect Detroit News to 
comply with our instructions. Considering the factors set 
DA 96·527 Federal Communications Commission Record 
forth in Section 503(b )(2) of the Act, we do not believe 
that the issuance of an additional forfeiture is warranted in 
this case. 
Conclusion and Ordering Clause 
8. UACN has presented no new evidence to support its 
request for increasing the forfeiture amount and designat­
ing the station for hearing. Further, it has failed to show 
any material error or omission in the NAL. Finally, con­
trary to UACN's contentions, we do not find that Detroit 
News' failure to complete Station WUSA's public file dur­
ing the pendency of its request for clarification warrants 
the imposition of an additional forfeiture against Detroit 
News. The Detroit News must, however, use its best efforts 
to complete Station WUSA's public file. 
9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that UACN's Petition 
for Reconsideration and Further Complaint is Denied, ex­
cept insofar as such Petition requested that Detroit News be 
required to complete its public file. 
10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Detroit News use 
its best efforts to complete its public inspection file with 
respect to the letters at issue here and that it file a report 
within sixty (60) days of the release of this Memorandum 
Opinion and Order, updating the Commission as to the 
status of its efforts to do so, as detailed in paragraph 5 
above. 
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 
Roy J. Stewart 
Chief Mass Media Bureau 
4162 
11 FCC Red No. 8