*Pages 1--3 from Microsoft Word - 12108.doc* NEWS News media Information 202 / 418- 0500 TTY 202 / 418- 25 Fax- On- Demand 202 / 418- 2830 Internet: http:// www. fcc. gov ftp. fcc. gov Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S. W. Washington, D. C. 20554 This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D. C. Circ 1974). October 12, 2001 FCC FILINGS October 3 In the Matter of Allocation and Designation of Spectrum for Fixed- Satellite Services in the 37.5- 38.5 GHz, 40.5- 41.5 GHz and 48. 2- 50. 2 GHz Frequency Bands; Allocation of Spectrum to Upgrade Fixed Mobile Allocations in the 40. 5 –42. 5 GHz Frequency Band; Allocation of Spectrum in the 46.9- 47.0 GHz Frequency Band for Wireless Services; and Allocation of Spectrum in the 37.0- 38.0 GHz and 40. 0- 40. 5 GHz for Government Operations (IB Docket No. 97- 95). Reply Comments -– INTELSAT Global Service Corporation, National Academy of Sciences, AT& T Corporation, Skytower, Inc. In the Matter of Revision of the Commission’s Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems (CC Docket No. 94- 102). Waiver Request -Bachow/ Coastel, L. L. C. In the Matter of 2001Annual Access Tariff Filings (CC Docket No. 01- 206). Reply Comments – ALLTEL Communications, Inc. October 4 In the Matter of Application of SBC Communications, Inc. Pursuant to Section 271 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to Provide In- Region, InterLATA Services in Arkansas and Missouri (CC Docket No. 01- 194). Reply Comments – Missouri Public Service Commission, WorldCom, Inc., WorldCom, Inc. In the Matter of Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service (CC Docket No. 96- 45). Comments – AT& T Corporation, WorldCom, Inc., Request to Withdraw Petition for Reconsideration and Application for Stay of Order – SBC Communications, Inc. In the Matter of Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service (CC Docket No. 96- 45)/ Forward Looking Mechanism for High Cost Support for Non- Rural LECs (CC Docket No. 97- 160). Comments – Roseville Telephone Company. 1 -2-In the Matter of Nextel Communications, Inc. and Pacific Wireless Technologies, Inc./ Request for Assignment of Licenses (WT Docket No. 01- 192)/ Nextel Communications and Chadmoore Wireless Group, Inc. Request for Assignment of Licenses (WT Docket No. 01- 193). Reply Comments – The Cities of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Phoenix, Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, Queen Anne’s County, Maryland, NATOA, Nextel, PWT. In the Matter of Numbering Resource Optimization (CC Docket No. 99- 200). Reply Comments – Metrocall, Inc, Power- Finder West Communications, LLC, Primo Enterprises, LLC and Tel/ Logic Inc. In re: MAG Proceeding CC Docket Nos. 00- 256, 96- 45, 98- 77, 98- 166). Comments – Molalla Communications, Pioneer Telephone Cooperative. October 5 In re: MAG Proceeding CC Docket Nos. 00- 256, 96- 45, 98- 77, 98- 166). Comments – Polar Communications, Ganado Telephone Company, In the Matter of Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime (CC DocketNo. 01- 92). Reply Comments – The General Services Administration. October 9 In the Matter of Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (CC Docket No. 98- 146). Reply Comments – Velocita Corporation, The Texas Coalition of Cities for Utility Issues, The City of Boulder, Colorado, The National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors and the National League of Cities, The City of Colorado Springs, Colorado3, AT& T Corporation, SBC Communications, Inc., The Competitive Telecommunications Association, Coring Incorporated, WorldCom, Earthlink, Inc., Alcatel, Inc., Telecommunications for the Deaf, Inc., The United States Telecom Association, In the Matter of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (CC Docket No. 96- 128)/ RBOC/ GTE/ SNET Payphone Coalition Petition for Clarification (NSD File No. L- 99- 34). Comments – Telstar International, Inc., Network Enhanced Telecom, LLP d/ b/ a Network IP, The American Public Communications Council; Petitions for Declaratory Ruling, Reconsideration and/ or Clarification – AT& T Corporation; Opposition – One Call Communications, Inc.; Petition for Waiver – One Call Communications, Inc., The International Prepaid Communications Association. 2 -3-In the Matter of Request for Review by Unicom, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator (Docket Nos. 96- 45 and 97- 21). Petition for Review – Unicom, Inc. October 10 In the Matter of Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L- Band and the 1. 6/ 2.4 GHz Band (IB Docket No. 01-185)/ Amendment of Section 2.106 of the Commission’s Rules to Allocate Spectrum at 2 GHz for Use by the Mobile Satellite Service (ET Docket No. 95- 18). Comments – David A. Montanaro. In the Matter of Petition for Waiver of the Benchmark Settlement Rate for Guyana (IB Docket No. 96- 261). Ex Parte Filing – Further Comments of Joseph A. Tyndall. In the Matter of Federal- State Joint Board on Universal Service (CC Docket No. 96- 45). Reply Comments – AT& T Corporation. -FCC- 3